400 Sprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (17)
- Book (10)
- Article (9)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
- Working Paper (2)
- Other (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (45) (remove)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (11)
- Deutsch (9)
- Grammatik (4)
- Kommunikation (4)
- Phonetik (4)
- Automatische Sprachproduktion (3)
- Corpus linguistics (3)
- Multimodalität (3)
- Rechtschreibung (3)
- Sprachgeschichte (3)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (17)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (14)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (1)
- Peer-Revied (1)
- Peer-review (1)
Publisher
- Heidelberg University Publishing (6)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (4)
- de Gruyter (4)
- De Gruyter (3)
- TUDpress (3)
- McGill University & Université de Montréal (2)
- Stauffenburg (2)
- V&R unipress (2)
- Accademia della Crusca (1)
- Aschendorff (1)
In recent years, formal semantic research on the meaning of tense and aspect has benefited from a number of studies investigating languages with graded tense systems. This paper contributes a first sketch of the temporal marking system of Awing (Grassfields Bantu), focusing on two varieties of remote past and remote future. We argue that the data support a "symmetric" analysis of past and future tense in Awing. In our specific proposal, Awing temporal remoteness markers are uniformly analyzed as quantificational tense operators, and both the past and the future paradigm include a form that prevents contextual restriction of this temporal quantifier.
In the first volume of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Gries (2005. Null-hypothesis significance testing of word frequencies: A follow-up on Kilgarriff. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2). doi:10.1515/ cllt.2005.1.2.277. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cllt.2005.1.issue-2/cllt.2005. 1.2.277/cllt.2005.1.2.277.xml: 285) asked whether corpus linguists should abandon null-hypothesis significance testing. In this paper, I want to revive this discussion by defending the argument that the assumptions that allow inferences about a given population – in this case about the studied languages – based on results observed in a sample – in this case a collection of naturally occurring language data – are not fulfilled. As a consequence, corpus linguists should indeed abandon null-hypothesis significance testing.
This chapter focuses on the formation of adverbs from a corpuslinguistic perspective, providing an overview of adverb formation patterns in German that includes frequencies and hints to productivity as well as combining quantitative methods and theoretically founded hypotheses to address questions that concern possible grammaticalization paths in domains that are formally marked by prepositional elements or inflectional morphology (in particular, superlative or superlative-derived forms). Within our collection of adverb types from the project corpus, special attention is paid to adverbs built from primary prepositions. The data suggest that generally, such adverb formation involves the saturation of the internal argument slot of the relation-denoting preposition. In morphologically regular formations with the preposition in final position, pronominal forms like da ‘there’, hier ‘here’, wo ‘where’ as well as hin ‘hither’ and her ‘thither’ serve to derive adverbs. On the other hand, morphologically irregular formations with the preposition – in particular: zu ‘to’ or vor ‘before, in front of’ – in initial posi-tion show traits of syntactic origin such as (remnants of) inflectional morphology. The pertaining adverb type dominantly saturates the internal argument slot by means of universal quantification that is part and parcel as well of the derivation of superlatives and demonstrably fuels the productivity of the pertaining formation pattern.
„Bausteine einer Korpusgrammatik des Deutschen“ ist eine neue Schriftenreihe, die am Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim (IDS) entsteht. Sie setzt sich zum Ziel, mit korpuslinguistischen Methoden die Vielfalt und Variabilität der deutschen Grammatik in großer Detailschärfe zu erfassen und gleichzeitig für die Validierbarkeit der Ergebnisse zu sorgen. Die erste Ausgabe enthält eine Einführung in die Reihe sowie vier als Kapitel einer neuen Grammatik gestaltete Texte: 1. Grundlegende Aspekte der Wortbildung, 2. Bau von und Umbau zu Adverbien, 3. Starke vs. schwache Flexion aufeinanderfolgender attributiver Adjektive und 4. Reihenfolge attributiver Adjektive. Die Ausgabe ist mit einer interaktiven Datenbank zu attributiven Adjektiven verknüpft.
Brief
(2022)
Der folgende Beitrag untersucht Briefe aus der Zeitspanne des Nationalsozialismus, die von unterschiedlichen Akteur*innen in unterschiedlichen Beteiligungsrollen verfasst worden sind. Es handelt sich um von Soldaten und ihren Angehörigen verfasste Feldpost-, um von Gegner*innen des Nationalsozialismus geschriebene Haftbriefe sowie um Eingaben an Staats- und Parteiinstanzen, die Teil des institutionellen Briefverkehrs sind. Alle diese Formen des Briefschreibens besitzen eine längere Tradition. Ihre Nutzung während der NS-Zeit ist jedoch durch spezifische Ausprägungen gekennzeichnet, die in den jeweiligen Abschnitten beleuchtet werden.
CMC Corpora in DeReKo
(2017)
We introduce three types of corpora of computer-mediated communication that have recently been compiled at the Institute for the German Language or curated from an external project and included in DeReKo, the German Reference Corpus, namely Wikipedia (discussion) corpora, the Usenet news corpus, and the Dortmund Chat Corpus. The data and corpora have been converted to I5, the TEI customization to represent texts in DeReKo, and are researchable via the web-based IDS corpus research interfaces and in the case of Wikipedia and chat also downloadable from the IDS repository and download server, respectively.
Effiziertes Objekt
(2020)
Einleitung
(2020)
A corpus-based academic grammar of German is an enormous undertaking, especially if it aims at using state-of-the-art methodology while ensuring that its study results are verifiable. The Bausteine-series, which is being developed at the Leibniz Institute for the German Language (IDS), presents individual “building blocks” for such a grammar. In addition to the peer-reviewed texts, the series publishes the results of statistical analyses and, for selected topics, the underlying data sets.