Lexikografie
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (340)
- Article (235)
- Conference Proceeding (52)
- Part of Periodical (48)
- Book (37)
- Review (14)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (459)
- Wörterbuch (223)
- Lexikographie (120)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (111)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (67)
- Rezension (59)
- Online-Wörterbuch (53)
- Internet (43)
- Wortschatz (40)
- Lexikografie (39)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (327)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (51)
- Postprint (9)
Reviewstate
Der Beitrag stellt die wissenschaftlichen und methodologischen Herausforderungen für die Erstellung einer innovativen, korpusbasierten lexikografischen Ressource zur Lexik des gesprochenen Deutsch in der Interaktion vor und zeigt neue Wege für lexikografische Arbeiten auf. Neben allgemeinen Projektinformationen zu den Ausgangspunkten, der Datengrundlage, den Methoden, Zielen und dem konkreten Gegenstandsbereich werden ausgewählte Ergebnisse von zwei projektbezogenen empirischen Studien zu Erwartungshaltungen an eine lexikografische Ressource des gesprochenen Deutsch präsentiert. Für korpusbasierte quantitative Informationen werden die Möglichkeiten eines Tools, welches im Rahmen des Projekts entwickelt wurde, aufgezeigt. Außerdem wird ein Einblick in die konzeptionellen und methodologischen Überlegungen zur Mikrostruktur der geplanten Ressource gegeben.
Are borrowed neologisms accepted more slowly into the German language than German words resulting from the application of wrd formation rules? This study addresses this question by focusing on two possible indicators for the acceptance of neologisms: a) frequency development of 239 German neologisms from the 1990s (loanwords as well as new words resulting from the application of word formation rules) in the German reference corpus DEREKO and b) frequency development in the use of pragmatic markers (‘flags’, namely quotation marks and phrases such as sogenannt ‘so-called’) with these words. In the second part of the article, a psycholinguistic approach to evaluating the (psychological) status of different neologisms and non-words in an experimentally controlled study and plans to carry out interviews in a field test to collect speakers’ opinions on the acceptance of the analysed neologisms are outlined. Finally, implications for the lexicographic treatment of both types of neologisms are discussed.
In an earlier publication it was claimed that there is no useful relationship between Swahili-English dictionary look-up frequencies and the occurrence frequencies for the same wordforms in Swahili-English corpora, at least not beyond the top few thousand wordforms. This result was challenged using data for German by a different team of researchers using an improved methodology. In the present article the original Swahili-English data is revisited, using ten years’ worth of it rather than just two, and using the improved methodology. We conclude that there is indeed a positive relationship. In addition, we show that online dictionary look-up behaviour is remarkably similar across languages, even when, as in our case, one is dealing with languages from very dissimilar language families. Furthermore, online dictionaries turn out to have minimum look-up success rates, below which they simply cannot go. These minima are language-sensitive and vary depending on the regularity of the searched-for entries, but are otherwise constant no matter the size of randomly sampled dictionaries. Corpus-informed sampling always improves on any random method. Lastly, from the point of view of the graphical user interface, we argue that the average user of an online bilingual dictionary is better served with a single search box, rather than separate search boxes for each dictionary side.
Novel formats of construction-based description hold great potential for phenomena that fall through the cracks in traditional kinds of linguistic reference works. On the example of German verb argument structure constructions with a prepositional object, we demonstrate that a construction-based description of such phenomena is superior to existing lexicographic and grammaticographic treatments, but that it also poses a number of new problems. The most fundamental of these relates to the fact that construction-based analyses can be proposed on different levels of abstraction. We illustrate pertinent problems relating to the precise identification of constructional form and meaning and suggest a multi-layered descriptive format for web-based electronic reference constructica that can accommodate these challenges. Semantically, the proposed solution integrates both lumping and splitting perspectives on constructional grain size and permits users to flexibly zoom in and out on individual elements in the resource. Formally, it can capture variation in the number and marking of realised arguments as found in e.g. passives and transitivity alternations. Aspects of the theoretical controversy between Construction Grammar and Valency Theory are addressed where relevant, but our focus is on questions of description and the practical implementation of construction-based analyses in a suitable type of linguistic reference work.