Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (2365)
- Article (1456)
- Book (649)
- Part of Periodical (220)
- Conference Proceeding (167)
- Review (152)
- Other (68)
- Working Paper (20)
- Doctoral Thesis (19)
- Preprint (7)
Language
- German (4641)
- English (410)
- Russian (43)
- Spanish (13)
- Portuguese (10)
- French (9)
- Multiple languages (5)
- Italian (3)
- Ukrainian (2)
- Bulgarian (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (5140) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (1505)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (715)
- Postprint (140)
- Erstveröffentlichung (4)
- Preprint (4)
- Ahead of Print (3)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2)
- Verlagsveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1651)
- Peer-Review (532)
- Verlags-Lektorat (48)
- Peer-review (25)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (14)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (7)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (6)
- Peer-Revied (5)
- Abschlussarbeit (Bachelor, Master, Diplom, Magister) (Bachelor, Master, Diss.) (2)
- Peer Review (2)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (785)
- de Gruyter (658)
- Schwann (620)
- Narr (306)
- Niemeyer (116)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (88)
- Narr Francke Attempto (88)
- Lang (84)
- De Gruyter (71)
- Winter (67)
Ergänzungssätze
(1977)
Sometimes in interaction, a speaker articulates an overt interpretation of prior talk. Such moments have been studied as involving the repair of a problem with the other’s talk or as formulating an understanding of the matter at hand. Stepping back from the established notions of formulations and repair, we examine the variety of actions speakers do with the practice of offering an interpretation, and the order within this domain. Results show half a dozen usage types of interpretations in mundane interaction. These form a largely continuous territory of action, with recognizably distinct usage types as well as cases falling between these (proto)typical uses. We locate order in the domain of interpretations using the method of semantic maps and show that, contrary to earlier assumptions in the literature, interpretations that formulate an understanding of the matter at hand are actually quite pervasive in ordinary talk. These findings contribute to research on action formation and advance our understanding of understanding in interaction. Data are video- and audio-recordings of mundane social interaction in the German language from a variety of settings.
In the management of cooperation, the fit of a requested action with what the addressee is presently doing is a pervasively relevant consideration. We present evidence that imperative turns are adapted to, and reflexively create, contexts in which the other person is committed to the course of action advanced by the imperative. This evidence comes from systematic variation in the design of imperative turns, relative to the fittedness of the imperatively mandated action to the addressee’s ongoing trajectory of actions, what we call the “dine of commitment”. We present four points on this dine: Responsive imperatives perform an operation on the deontic dimension of what the addressee has announced or already begun to do (in particular its permissibility); local-project imperatives formulate a new action advancing a course of action in which the addressee is already actively engaged; global-project-imperatives target a next task for which the addressee is available on the grounds of their participation in the overall event, and in the absence of any competing work; and competitive imperatives draw on a presently otherwise engaged addressee on the grounds of their social commitment to the relevant course of actions. These four turn shapes are increasingly complex, reflecting the interactional work required to bridge the increasing distance between what the addressee is currently doing, and what the imperative mandates. We present data from German and Polish informal and institutional settings.
This paper introduces a method for computer-based analyses of metaphor in discourse, combining quantitative and qualitative elements. This method is illustrated with data from research on German newspaper discourse concerning the ongoing system transformations of the late 1980s and early 1990s. Methodological aspects of the research procedure are discussed and it is argued that quantitative elements can enhance comparability in cross-cultural and cross-lingual research. Some basic findings of the research are presented. The peculiarities of the German Wende discourse - especially the salience of a passive perspective on the ongoing political and social changes - are outlined.
W artykule tym przyglfjdam si. zasadniczej dia j.zykowego obrazu swiata opozycji mi.dzy swotm i obcym w przykladowych tckstach przynaleznych do polskiego i niemieckiego dyskursu Ideologieznego (politycznego). Za van Dijkicin przyjmuj., ze charakterystyczne dla dyskursu ideologicznego jest ustalenie i reprodukeja rozr.zmenia mi.dzy grupa wlasn^ a innymi grupami. Funkcjq dyskursu ideologicznego jest legitymizaeja dzialan i przekonan grupy wlasnej oraz delegitymizacja dzialan i przekonan innych grup. W populamych czasopismach polskich i niemieckich, traktuj^cych o tematach politycznych ( Wprost i Spiegel) takie pojmowanie swojego i obeego wydaje si. byc akeeptowane. Konkretyzacja absttakcyjnych poj.c. sw.j i obey przy tym nie jest stala, a raczej funkcjonalnie zmienna, zaleznie od tego, kto ma byc postrzegany jako rialeziycy do grupy wlasnej, a kto ma byc z niej wylijczony.