Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)
  • search hit 13 of 307
Back to Result List

Wie soll die Grammatikbeschreibung mit Konstruktionen umgehen?

  • Constructionist approaches to grammar do not draw a clear distinction between lexicon and grammar, as generative "words and rules" accounts do. Rather, they conceptualize grammar and lexicon as a continuum of constructions of greater or lesser complexity and abstraction. In this paper, i explore the implications of this paradigm shift for the applied discipline of grammaticography. If we abandon the distinction between grammar and lexicon, should we also abandon the distinction between grammar, books and dictionaries? Drawing on a case study on the treatment of verbless constructions in the "IDS-Grammatik", it is argued that constructions should play a greater role in grammar books, but that grammar books still need to provide access to general principles of grammar.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author:Rita FinkbeinerORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-121440
ISBN:978-3-8233-9107-4
ISSN:0949-409X
Parent Title (German):Grammatiktheorie und Grammatikographie
Series (Serial Number):Studien zur deutschen Sprache (76)
Publisher:Narr Francke Attempto
Place of publication:Tübingen
Editor:Eric Fuß, Angelika Wöllstein
Document Type:Part of a Book
Language:German
Year of first Publication:2018
Date of Publication (online):2023/10/02
Publishing Institution:Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) [Zweitveröffentlichung]
Publicationstate:Zweitveröffentlichung
Reviewstate:(Verlags)-Lektorat
Tag:Grammatikbeschreibung; Konstruktionen; Lexikon-Syntax-Interaktion
GND Keyword:Grammatiktheorie; Konstruktionsgrammatik; Lexikon; Syntax
First Page:139
Last Page:173
DDC classes:400 Sprache / 400 Sprache, Linguistik
Open Access?:ja
BDSL-Classification:Grammatik
Linguistics-Classification:Grammatikforschung
Licence (German):License LogoUrheberrechtlich geschützt