Sprache im 20. Jahrhundert. Gegenwartssprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (36) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (36)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (36) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (19)
- Gesprochene Sprache (9)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (9)
- Englisch (5)
- Annotation (3)
- Verb (3)
- Artikulatorische Phonetik (2)
- Automatische Sprachanalyse (2)
- Automatische Spracherkennung (2)
- Fachsprache (2)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (10)
- Postprint (6)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (3)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (6)
- Peer-Review (5)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (4)
Publisher
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2)
- Evangelische Akademie Loccum (2)
- ISCA (2)
- Niemeyer (2)
- Aisthesis (1)
- Arbeitskreis Deutsch als Fremdsprache beim DAAD (AKDaF) (1)
- Association of Internet Researchers (1)
- BKA (1)
- Berkeley Linguistics Society (1)
- Department of Phonetics, Trier University (1)
The aim of this paper is to highlight the actual need for corpora that have been annotated based on acoustic information. The acoustic information should be coded in features or properties and is needed to inform further processing systems, i.e. to present a basis for a speech recognition system using linguistic information. Feature annotation of existing corpora in combination with segmental annotation can provide a powerful training material for speech recognition systems, but will as well challenge the further processing of features to segments and syllables. We present here the theoretical preliminaries for our multilingual feature extraction system, that we are currently working on.
Whether verbs have to be marked as punctual vs. durative has been a controversial issue from the very beginnings of research on aktionsarten in the last century right on up to modern theories of aspectual classes and aspect composition. Debates about the linguistic necessity of this distinction have often been accompanied by the question of what it means for a verb to be temporally punctual. In this paper I will, firstly, sketch the history of research on the punctual-durative distinction and present several linguistic arguments in its favor. Secondly, I will show how this distinction is captured in an eventstructure- based approach to lexical semantics. Thirdly, I will discuss the extent to which a precise definition of the notions used in lexical
representations helps avoid circular argumentation in lexical semantics. Finally, I will demonstrate how this can be done for the notion of ‘punctuality’ by clarifying the logical type of this predicate and relating it to central cognitive time concepts.