Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (292) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (133)
- Article (89)
- Conference Proceeding (27)
- Book (21)
- Part of Periodical (10)
- Review (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Other (2)
- Preprint (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (136)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (22)
- Mediensprache (17)
- Lexikographie (15)
- Konversationsanalyse (14)
- Massenmedien (14)
- Wörterbuch (14)
- Englisch (12)
- Gesprochene Sprache (11)
- Syntax (11)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (87)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (27)
- Postprint (15)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (71)
- Peer-Review (39)
- Verlags-Lektorat (12)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (2)
- Peer review (1)
- Peer-review (1)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (1)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (40)
- de Gruyter (33)
- De Gruyter (20)
- Narr (15)
- Lang (8)
- Benjamins (6)
- Elsevier (6)
- Springer (5)
- De Gruyter Mouton (4)
- Olms (4)
The paper presents a study on the use of the complement-taking mental verb glauben (to believe) as a means to hedge utterances. One the basis of three large interview corpora, diatopic and diachronic differences in the particle-like use of first-person-forms (glaub(e)) are explored. By means of the results of the corpus analysis, the status of the ongoing grammaticalization process of glaub(e) as a modal particle is discussed.
Das Benennungsspiel in der frühen Erwachsenen-Kind-Interaktion : eine Longitudinalstudie auf Deutsch
(2013)
The education of prospective professionals of social work is mostly carried out through narrations on clients. Specific features of professional narrative are highlighted in an excerpt of a tutorial from a narratological perspective. Also, the relationship management between narrator and recipient is examined from an interactionist point of view.
Textual structures in printed dictionaries are well known, adequately researched, and rather exhaustively described (cf. articles 3&10). This article investigates whether or not the models of textual structures in printed dictionaries can be applied to electronic dictionaries (EDs); or, more precisely, which parts of the order and terminology of textual structures in printed dictionaries are applicable to electronic ones and of which differences should one be aware. The focus will be on online dictionaries because they represent the most important kind of digital dictionary, and will become even more important in future. Furthermore, the emphasis will be more on potential future forms of online dictionaries than on current ones which are still sometimes produced as copies of their printed counterparts. To approach this question, basic differences between textual structures in electronic versus printed dictionaries will firstly be discussed. Secondly, further terminological and formal preliminary remarks will be made. The main part of the article will then follow to adapt de Schryver’s idea of “Creating order in dreamland” expressed in his article “Lexicographer’s dreams in the electronic dictionary age”. The aim here is to begin ‘create order in terminology land’ for textual structures in electronic dictionaries. A definitive order cannot be given here because electronic lexicography today involves constant change. In order to discuss the order of textual structures in EDs, not only theoretically, but also in concrete terms, their basic properties will be illustrated by means of a notional online dictionary. Following on from this fictitious scenario, a provisional survey of textual structures in EDs will be presented. Thereby, the focus is less on current online dictionaries than on the possibilities which the new medium provides. Finally, an explanation will be given as to how this view of structures in electronic dictionaries is useful for analyzing current EDs and for planning new ones. The overall aim here is not to introduce new kinds of textual structure in EDs and a corresponding terminology in detail, but to point out some constitutive differences between textual structures in printed dictionaries and those in electronic dictionaries.
Dictionary portals
(2013)
Die Abbildung und Modellierung von Varianz wird im Projekt Wechselwirkungen zwischen linguistischen Verfahren, Methoden und Algorithmen auf der sprachlichen Seite u.a. repräsentiert durch die Metalemmaliste, die Lemmata der neuhochdeutschen Standardsprache mit diachronisch und diatopisch markierten Lemmata verknüpft. Die zeitlich und regional markierten Varianten stammen aus Wörterbüchern des Trierer Wörterbuchnetzes. Die Lemmata der nhd. Standardsprache werden in einer korpusgenerierten Basislemmaliste (BLL) zur Verfügung gestellt, in der neben den Lemmata auch Angaben zu deren Wortart(en) und Gebrauchshäufigkeit verzeichnet sind. Die Lemmata der BLL bilden das Gemeinsame Dritte, auf das die Lemmata der Varietäten-Wörterbücher in der Metalemmaliste abgebildet sind, die Lemmata der BLL der nhd. Standardsprache konstituieren die Metalemmata der Metalemmaliste. Die BLL soll in ihrer Funktion als Tertium Comparationis den Sprachgebrauch im heutigen Standarddeutsch widerspiegeln. Dadurch wird sichergestellt, dass die verschiedenen Instanzen der Varietätenlemmata auf Lemmata abgebildet werden, die momentan in der Standardsprache gebräuchlich sind. Über das Metalemma lassen sich die äquivalenten Ausdrücke in den Varietäten finden, ohne dass man von deren regionalen oder historischen Ausprägungen Kenntnisse besitzt. Die Umsetzung der semasiologischen Zugriffsmöglichkeit auf sämtliche Varietätenlemmata über ein Lemma der nhd. Standardsprache erfolgt auf der Grundlage einer XML-basierten Datenbank nach aktuellen Standards der Kodierung von Lexikoneinträgen (TEI P5). Die Metalemmaliste ist dynamisch und netzartig konzipiert, so dass immer neue Teilbereiche, Verzweigungen und Ontologien angedockt werden können (vgl. TV 2). Die Anknüpfung der Varietätenlemmata an die Lemmata der nhd. Standardsprache aus der BLL erfolgt mit Hilfe von Algorithmen, die im TV 3.2. (Informatik Würzburg) implementiert wurden.
This article advocates an understanding of ‘positioning’ as a key to the analysis of identities in interaction within the methodological framework of conversation analysis. Building on research by Bamberg, Georgakopoulou and others, a performative, interaction-based approach to positioning is outlined and compared to membership categorization analysis. An interactional episode involving mock stories to reveal and reproach an inadequate identity-claim of a co-participant is analysed both in terms of practices of membership categorization and positioning. It is concluded that membership categorization is a core element of positioning. Still, positioning goes beyond membership categorization in a) revealing biographical dimensions accomplished by narration and b) by uncovering implicit performative claims of identity, which are not established by categorization or description.