Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (135) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (53)
- Conference Proceeding (30)
- Part of a Book (22)
- Book (14)
- Other (5)
- Review (5)
- Working Paper (4)
- Part of Periodical (2)
Language
- German (75)
- English (56)
- Multiple languages (2)
- Ukrainian (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (135) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (45)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (31)
- Gesprochene Sprache (13)
- Automatische Sprachanalyse (12)
- Konversationsanalyse (9)
- corpus linguistics (9)
- Interaktion (7)
- Social Media (7)
- Kommunikation (6)
- Sprachstatistik (6)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (135) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (75)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (56)
Publisher
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (25)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (19)
- German Society for Computational Linguistics & Language Technology und Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (9)
- Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (6)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (5)
- de Gruyter (5)
- Heidelberg University Publishing (4)
- Narr (4)
- The Association for Computational Linguistics (4)
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft Verlagsgesellschaft (3)
This chapter investigates differences in language regards in Latvia and Estonia. Based on the results of a survey that had about 1000 respondents in each country, it analyses general views on languages and language-learning motivation, as well as specific regards of Estonian, Latvian, Russian, English, German and other languages. The results show that languages and language learning are generally important for the respondents; language-learning motivation is overwhelmingly instrumental. Besides the obvious value of the titular languages of each country, English and Russian are to differing degrees considered of importance for professional and leisure purposes, ahead of German, Finnish (in Estonia) and French, whereas other languages are of little relevance. In more emotionally related categories, differences are more salient. L1-speakers of Russian differ in their views from L1-speakers of Estonian and Latvian, indicating that the linguistic acculturation of society in Estonia tends to be more monodirectional towards Estonian, whereas in Latvia there are more bidirectional tendencies as both Latvian and Russian L1-speakers regard each other’s languages as at least moderately relevant.
Resistance and adaptation to newspeakerness in educational institutions: two tales from Estonia
(2019)
The term ‘new speaker’ has recently emerged as an attempt by sociolinguists not only to understand the diferent types of speaker profles that can be found in contemporary societies, but also to grasp the underlying processes of becoming a legitimate speaker in a given society. In this article, we combine the results from two studies situated in two educational institutions in Estonia in order to fnd out about speakers’ language attitudes and experiences in connection to learning and using Estonian. We concentrate on members of the international community who have relatively recently arrived to the country. Our results indicate that these speakers fuctuate between two prototypical discourses, which we broadly dub as ‘resistance’ and ‘adaptation’ to newspeakerness. Our study thereby adds to current debates on ‘new speaker’ and language policy issues by illustrating how tensions around language legitimacy are played out on the ground in a small nation state such as Estonia.
This paper focuses on so called syntactic projection phenomena in the German language. This term from the German Gesprächsforschung is used to define the fact that an utterance or part of it foreshadows another one. This paper aims at pointing out how such projection phenomena are consciously exploited for rhethorical purposes. This will be observed on the basis of excerpts from the Stuttgart 21 mediation talks. The linguistic analysis carried out in this paper will focus on syntactic projection phenomena involving the use of causal adverbial connectives deshalb and deswegen.
This paper aims at investigating the usage of present subjunctive (Konjunktiv I), which is traditionally labelled as a feature of standard written language and therefore as typically occurring in communication genres based on it such as press texts and reporting, in everyday spoken German. Through an analysis of corpus data performed according to theory and method of Interactional Linguistics and encompassing private, institutional and public interactional domains, the paper will show how this particular verb form expresses different epistemic stances according to its syntactic embedment.
Preface
(2019)
Der vorliegende Beitrag setzt sich mit dem computergestützten Transkriptionsverfahren arabisch-deutscher Gesprächsdaten für interaktionsbezogene Untersuchungen auseinander. Zunächst werden wesentliche methodische Herausforderungen der gesprächsanalytischen Arbeit adressiert: Hinsichtlich der derzeitigen Korpustechnologie ermöglicht die Verwendung von arabischen Schriftzeichen in einem mehrsprachigen, bidirektionalen Transkript keine analysegerechte Rekonstruktion von Reziprozität, Linearität und Simultaneität sprachlichen Handelns. Zudem ist die Verschriftung von arabischen Gesprächsdaten aufgrund der unzureichenden (gesprächsanalytischen) Beschäftigung mit den standardfernen Varietäten und gesprochensprachlichen Phänomenen erschwert. Daher widmet sich der zweite Teil des Beitrags den bisher erarbeiteten und erprobten Lösungsansätzen ̶ einem stringenten, gesprächsanalytisch fundierten Transkriptionssystem für gesprochenes Arabisch.
The paper deals with the process of computer-aided transcription regarding Arabic-German data material for interaction-based studies. First of all, it sheds light upon some major methodological challenges posed by the conversation-analytic approaches: due to current corpus technology, the reciprocity, linearity, and simultaneity of linguistic activities cannot be reconstructed in an analytically proper way when using the Arabic characters in multilingual and bidirectional transcripts. The difficulty of transcribing Arabic encounters is also compounded by the fact that Spoken Arabic as well as its varieties and phenomena have not been standardised enough (for conversation-analytic purposes). Therefore, the second part of this paper is dedicated to preliminary, self-developed solutions, namely a systematic method for transcribing Spoken Arabic.
Content
1 Predicting learner knowledge of individual words using machine learning
Drilon Avdiu, Vanessa Bui, Klára Ptacinová Klimci´ková
2 Automatic Generation and Semantic Grading of Esperanto Sentences in a Teaching Context
Eckhard Bick
3 Toward automatic improvement of language produced by non-native language learners
Mathias Creutz, Eetu Sjöblom
4 Linguistic features and proficiency classification in L2 Spanish and L2 Portuguese
Iria del Ri´o
5 Integrating large-scale web data and curated corpus data in a search engine supporting German literacy education
Sabrina Dittrich, Zarah Weiss, Hannes Schröter, Detmar Meurers
6 Formalism for a language agnostic language learning game and productive grid generation
Sylvain Hatier, Arnaud Bey, Mathieu Loiseau
7 Understanding Vocabulary Growth Through An Adaptive Language Learning System
Elma Kerz, Andreas Burgdorf, Daniel Wiechmann, Stefan Meeger,Yu Qiao, Christian Kohlschein, Tobias Meisen
8 Summarization Evaluation meets Short-Answer Grading
Margot Mieskes, Ulrike Padó
9 Experiments on Non-native Speech Assessment and its Consistency
Ziwei Zhou, Sowmya Vajjala, Seyed Vahid Mirnezami
10 The Impact of Spelling Correction and Task Context on Short Answer Assessment for Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Ramon Ziai, Florian Nuxoll, Kordula De Kuthy, Björn Rudzewitz, Detmar Meurers
You might not know what a “smombie” is, but you have certainly already met one today. In public streets and places, the so-called “smartphone zombies” regularly cross our ways. They walk slowly, in peculiar ways, their eyes and fingers focused on their smartphone displays. While some cities have already introduced specific walking lanes or ground-level traffic signs for smartphone users “on the go”, it is not only road safety that is at stake. Frequently hunching over our phones causes cervical pain, we are addicted to likes on social media, and the fear of missing out prevents us from switching off our phones. If asked if mobile device use is possibly harmful to our bodies and minds, most people would spontaneously agree. Our social skills seem to constantly diminish since smartphones have become an everyday tool: we stick to them like glue while waiting for the bus, while walking, while eating, even while being with others. Will we turn into social zombies in the end?