Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (135) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (53)
- Conference Proceeding (30)
- Part of a Book (22)
- Book (14)
- Other (5)
- Review (5)
- Working Paper (4)
- Part of Periodical (2)
Language
- German (75)
- English (56)
- Multiple languages (2)
- Ukrainian (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (135) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (45)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (31)
- Gesprochene Sprache (13)
- Automatische Sprachanalyse (12)
- Konversationsanalyse (9)
- corpus linguistics (9)
- Interaktion (7)
- Social Media (7)
- Kommunikation (6)
- Sprachstatistik (6)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (135) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (75)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (56)
Publisher
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (25)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (19)
- German Society for Computational Linguistics & Language Technology und Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (9)
- Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (6)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (5)
- de Gruyter (5)
- Heidelberg University Publishing (4)
- Narr (4)
- The Association for Computational Linguistics (4)
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft Verlagsgesellschaft (3)
Large-scale empirical evidence indicates a fascinating statistical relationship between the estimated number of language users and its linguistic and statistical structure. In this context, the linguistic niche hypothesis argues that this relationship reflects a negative selection against morphological paradigms that are hard to learn for adults, because languages with a large number of speakers are assumed to be typically spoken and learned by greater proportions of adults. In this paper, this conjecture is tested empirically for more than 2000 languages. The results question the idea of the impact of non-native speakers on the grammatical and statistical structure of languages, as it is demonstrated that the relative proportion of non-native speakers does not significantly correlate with either morphological or information-theoretic complexity. While it thus seems that large numbers of adult learners/speakers do not affect the (grammatical or statistical) structure of a language, the results suggest that there is indeed a relationship between the number of speakers and (especially) information-theoretic complexity, i.e. entropy rates. A potential explanation for the observed relationship is discussed.
Both compounds and multi-word expressions are complex lexical units, made up of at least two constituents. The most basic difference is that the former are morphological objects and the latter result from syntactic processes. However, the exact demarcation between compounds and multi-word expressions differs greatly from language to language and is often a matter of debate in and across languages. Similarly debated is whether and how these two different kinds of units complement or compete with each other.
The volume presents an overview of compounds and multi-word expressions in a variety of European languages. Central questions that are discussed for each language concern the formal distinction between compounds and multi-word expressions, their formation and their status in lexicon and grammar.
The volume contains chapters on German, English, Dutch, French, Italian, Spanish, Greek, Russian, Polish, Finnish, and Hungarian as well as a contrastive overview with a focus on German. It brings together insights from word-formation theory, phraseology and theory of grammar and aims to contribute to the understanding of the lexicon, both from a language-specific and cross-linguistic perspective.