Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (173) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (99)
- Article (43)
- Conference Proceeding (24)
- Other (4)
- Book (2)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (60)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (20)
- Linguistik (19)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (18)
- Germanistik (17)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache <Mannheim> (14)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (13)
- Gastwissenschaftler (13)
- Gesprochene Sprache (10)
- Wissenschaftsgeschichte (10)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (173) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (117)
- Peer-Review (34)
- Verlags-Lektorat (6)
- Peer-review (3)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (2)
- (Verlags)Lektorat (1)
- Peer-Revied (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (47)
- De Gruyter (22)
- de Gruyter (22)
- Stauffenburg (7)
- Universitätsverlag Hildesheim (4)
- Erich Schmidt Verlag (3)
- International Speech Communication Association (3)
- Lang (3)
- European Language Resources Association (2)
- Schmidt (2)
Zur Frühgeschichte des IDS
(2014)
Der Beitrag beschreibt die Grundstruktur des Forschungsprojekts ‚Standardization in Diversity (SDiv). The case of German in Luxembourg 1795–1920‘, das im Zeitraum 2013–2016 vom Fonds National de la Recherche (Luxemburg) und der DFG gefördert wird. Weitere Informationen auf der Internetseite des Projekts unter http://infolux.uni.lu/standardization.
This paper investigates the syntactic behaviour of adverbial clauses in contemporary German and Italian. It focuses on three main questions: (i) How many degrees of syntactic integration of adverbial clauses are there to be distinguished by an adequate grammatical description of the two languages? (ii) Which linear and hierarchical positions in the structure of the matrix sentence can be occupied by adverbial clauses? (iii) Which is the empirical distribution of adverbial clauses introduced by the conjunctions als, während, wenn, obwohl and weil in German, as well as quando, mentre, se, sebbene and perché in Italian?
Responding to question (i), a distinction is drawn between strongly integrated, weakly integrated and syntactically disintegrated adverbial clauses. There are further degrees on the gradient of syntactic integration, which are not examined in this paper. Responding to question (ii), eight classes of structural positions in the matrix sentence are identified that can be occupied by adverbial clauses. Five of them are positions of syntactic integration, three are positions of disintegration. Responding to question (iii), the distribution of the ten classes of adverbial clauses is described on the basis of a corpus of internet data. Strongly integrated, weakly integrated and disintegrated adverbial clauses show clearly different distributions within the structure of the matrix sentence. Also the semantic classes of adverbial clauses (temporal, adversative, conditional, concessive, causal) are distributed differently.
In 2010, ISO published a standard for syntactic annotation, ISO 24615:2010 (SynAF). Back then, the document specified a comprehensive reference model for the representation of syntactic annotations, but no accompanying XML serialisation. ISO’s subcommittee on language resource management (ISO TC 37/SC 4) is working on making the SynAF serialisation ISOTiger an additional part of the standard. This contribution addresses the current state of development of ISOTiger, along with a number of open issues on which we are seeking community feedback in order to ensure that ISOTiger becomes a useful extension to the SynAF reference model.