Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (55) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (42)
- Article (12)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (55)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (55) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (26)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (12)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache <Mannheim> (8)
- Benutzer (7)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (5)
- Wissenschaftsgeschichte (5)
- Englisch (3)
- Gesprochene Sprache (3)
- Grammatik (3)
- Rumänisch (3)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (55) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (33)
- Peer-Review (12)
- Verlags-Lektorat (4)
- Peer-review (3)
- (Verlags)Lektorat (1)
- Peer-Revied (1)
Publisher
- De Gruyter (21)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (13)
- Erich Schmidt Verlag (3)
- Stauffenburg (3)
- Schöningh (2)
- de Gruyter (2)
- Buske (1)
- Schmidt (1)
- Tübinger Vereinigung für Volkskunde (1)
- Univ. Heidelberg (1)
Der Beitrag behandelt die Frage, inwiefern es sich bei den gegenwärtigen Russlanddeutschen (Erwachsenen und Jugendlichen der ersten Generation, Einwanderungswelle der 1990er Jahre aus Sprachinseln) um Re-Migranten handelt, welche Veränderungen in den Varietätenrepertoires stattfinden und welche Schwierigkeiten und Probleme, aber auch Vorteile sich durch diese spezifische Migrationskonfiguration für die zugewanderten Russlanddeutschen ergeben. Die besondere Situation der Re-Migration mit der spezifischen linguistisch-soziolinguistischen Problematik wird durch Beispiele aus dem aktuellen IDS-Projekt „Migrationslinguistik“ veranschaulicht. Einerseits liegen besondere varietätenlinguistische Konstellationen vor, die bei der russlanddeutschen Migrantenpopulation generationenspezifische Konturen aufweisen. Dadurch entstehen andererseits unikale linguistische Sprachkontaktbedingungen, die die sprachlich-kommunikative Integration und den Erhalt der Migrantensprache Russisch in besonderer Weise beeinflussen können.
This paper investigates the syntactic behaviour of adverbial clauses in contemporary German and Italian. It focuses on three main questions: (i) How many degrees of syntactic integration of adverbial clauses are there to be distinguished by an adequate grammatical description of the two languages? (ii) Which linear and hierarchical positions in the structure of the matrix sentence can be occupied by adverbial clauses? (iii) Which is the empirical distribution of adverbial clauses introduced by the conjunctions als, während, wenn, obwohl and weil in German, as well as quando, mentre, se, sebbene and perché in Italian?
Responding to question (i), a distinction is drawn between strongly integrated, weakly integrated and syntactically disintegrated adverbial clauses. There are further degrees on the gradient of syntactic integration, which are not examined in this paper. Responding to question (ii), eight classes of structural positions in the matrix sentence are identified that can be occupied by adverbial clauses. Five of them are positions of syntactic integration, three are positions of disintegration. Responding to question (iii), the distribution of the ten classes of adverbial clauses is described on the basis of a corpus of internet data. Strongly integrated, weakly integrated and disintegrated adverbial clauses show clearly different distributions within the structure of the matrix sentence. Also the semantic classes of adverbial clauses (temporal, adversative, conditional, concessive, causal) are distributed differently.
In 2010, ISO published a standard for syntactic annotation, ISO 24615:2010 (SynAF). Back then, the document specified a comprehensive reference model for the representation of syntactic annotations, but no accompanying XML serialisation. ISO’s subcommittee on language resource management (ISO TC 37/SC 4) is working on making the SynAF serialisation ISOTiger an additional part of the standard. This contribution addresses the current state of development of ISOTiger, along with a number of open issues on which we are seeking community feedback in order to ensure that ISOTiger becomes a useful extension to the SynAF reference model.
The article investigates the conditions under which the w-relativizer was appears instead of the d-relativzer das in German relative clauses. Building on Wiese 2013, we argue that was constitutes the elsewhere case that applies when identification with the antecedent cannot be established by syntactic means via upward agreement with respect to phi-features. Corpuslinguistic results point to the conclusion that this is the case whenever there is no lexical nominal in the antecedent that, following Geach 1962 and Baker 2003, supplies a criterion of identity needed to establish sameness of reference between the antecedent and the relativizer.