“Can I infer from this…”: Interpretation practices in a publicly televised mediation
- This study deals with interpretation practices that speakers employ in order to (re)formulate what another person has said or implied. Analyzing interpretations in a public televised mediation that resembles a public debate, I show which kinds of interpretation practices that speakers adopt and how they differ depending the participants' roles. Systematically comparing all interpretations of the mediator vs. the opposing participants’, I argue that interpretations can be described as general practices with specific interactional effects, but that they are designed and exploited in different ways (i.e., for clarification and discourse-organization vs. self- and other-positioning and constructing arguments). I point out that speakers use meta-pragmatic accounts that support the interactional effects of their interpretations.
Author: | Henrike HelmerORCiDGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-104035 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.002 |
ISSN: | 0378-2166 |
Parent Title (English): | Journal of Pragmatics |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Place of publication: | Amsterdam |
Document Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Year of first Publication: | 2021 |
Date of Publication (online): | 2021/04/15 |
Reviewstate: | Peer-Review |
Tag: | conversation analysis; formulations; interpretation practices; mediation; meta-pragmatic accounts; political debate |
GND Keyword: | Debatte; Fernsehsendung; Interaktion; Konversationsanalyse; Mediation |
Volume: | 178 |
First Page: | 127 |
Last Page: | 145 |
Note: | Dieser Beitrag ist aus urheberrechtlichen Gründen nicht frei zugänglich. / Due to copyright reasons the full-text of the article is not freely accessible. |
DDC classes: | 400 Sprache / 400 Sprache, Linguistik |
Open Access?: | nein |
Program areas: | P1: Interaktion |
Licence (German): | ![]() |