400 Sprache, Linguistik
Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Mimik (3) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (2)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Taylor & Francis (1)
- Winter (1)
- de Gruyter (1)
In der Physiotherapie erlernen Patienten Übungen, um Erkrankungen des Bewegungsapparats durch Bewegung zu therapieren. Angeleitet werden sie hierzu durch multimodale Instruktionen, die als längere Instruktions‚sequenzen‘ aus Direktiva, Korrekturen und Accounts gestaltet sind. Anhand eines Korpus aus Videoaufnahmen erforscht diese Arbeit erstmals die Instruktionspraxis in authentischen Physiotherapiesitzungen in Bezug auf die verbalen und leiblichen Praktiken des Instruierens.
Der Fokus der multimodalen Analysen liegt auf den Einsatzbedingungen und spezifischen instruktionalen Leistungen der einzelnen Handlungsressourcen (wie Sprache, Blick, Gestik, Demonstration, Berührung etc.) und ihrer genauen Realisierung. Insbesondere in der Erforschung taktiler Praktiken betritt die Studie Neuland in der Interaktionsanalyse. Die lückenlose Aufnahme ganzer Physiotherapieprozesse ermöglicht zudem Einblicke in die longitudinale Entwicklung von Instruktionsprozessen und deren Veränderung in Abhängigkeit vom ‚common ground‘ innerhalb längerer Interaktionsgeschichten.
In this chapter, I will focus on the phenomenon of drop out, i.e., withdrawal from the turn due to overlapping talk, in order to reflect on the link between “unfinished” turns and participation framework. With the help of a sequential and multimodal analysis inspired by the conversation analytical approach, I will show that dropping out from a turn is strongly linked to the availability displayed by potential recipients of a turn-at-talk. Although conversation analysis has described in detail the systematics of overlapping talk, especially of its onset (Jefferson 1973, 1983, 1986) and its resolution (Scheg-loff 2000; Jefferson 2004), the phenomenon of withdrawal from a turn due to simultaneous talk has not been investigated in detail. While it seems to bedifficult to describe this interactional practice by referring exclusively to syntactic features (incompleteness of the turn), I suggest looking at turn withdrawal from a multimodal perspective (e.g. Goodwin 1980, 1981; Mondada2007a; Schmitt 2005), taking into account visible resources like gaze or gesture. The problem of continuing or stopping a turn-in-progress in overlapping talk can be closely linked to the participation framework (Goodwin and Goodwin 2004), as speakers do visibly take into account their recipient’s availability and coordinate their turn construction with the dynamic changes of the participation framework and the interactional space.
This study examines head nods produced as embodied and silent answers to polar questions before a transition relevance place has been reached. It discusses the notion of “response” and the ways in which the literature conceptualizes head nods. The analysis of video recordings of ordinary and institutional multiparty interactions shows that answer-nods rely on mutual gaze and that affirmative head nods may co-occur with other facial expressions (e.g., eye blinks). By replying with a silent head nod, respondents may complete an unfolding adjacency pair without claiming speakership, thereby enabling the questioner to extend their turn-in-progress. Alternatively, respondents may expand their answer-nod with talk, in which case silent nodding may contribute to organizing the smooth transition of turns-at-talk. Head nods produced while a question is unfolding are described as a microsequential phenomenon that may affect the questioner’s turn-in-progress. Data are in French and Italian.