400 Sprache, Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (7)
- Article (6)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Book (1)
Language
- English (11)
- German (5)
- Multiple languages (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (18)
Keywords
- Methodologie (18) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (8)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (7)
- Postprint (4)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (13)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (5)
Publisher
- Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys AFinLA (3)
- de Gruyter (2)
- Beltz (1)
- Benjamins (1)
- Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia (1)
- Dictionary Society of North America (1)
- Edinburgh University Press (1)
- Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València (1)
- J. B. Metzler (1)
- Niemeyer (1)
In a previous article (Faaß et al., 2012), a first attempt was made at documenting and encoding morphemic units of two South African Bantu languages, i.e. Northern Sotho and Zulu, with the aim of describing and storing the morphemic units of these two languages in a single relational database, structured as a hierarchical ontology. As a follow-up, the current article describes the implementation of our part-of-speech ontology. We give a detailed description of the morphemes and categories contained in the database, highlighting the need and reasons for a flexible ontology which will provide for both language specific and general linguistic information. By giving a detailed account of the methodology for the population of the database, we provide linguists from other Bantu languages with a road map for extending the database to also include their languages of specialization.
In der Diskussion um Methodologie und Methoden finden unterschiedliche
wissenschaftliche Arbeitsbereiche und Forschungsaktivitäten stets einen gemeinsamen Nenner. Ulrike Froschauer hat sich lange Jahre ausführlich und intensiv mit den Fragestellungen der Organisationssoziologie beschäftigt. Die vorliegenden Buchveröffentlichungen wie beispielsweise „Organisationen in Bewegung. Beiträge zur interpretativen Organisationsanalyse“ (2012) oder „Organisationen im Wechselspiel von Dynamik und Stabilität“ (2015) geben einen guten Zugang zu ihrem wissenschaftlichen Wirken. Das Arbeitsfeld unserer Forschungsgruppe ist ein anderes, nämlich das der Medienwissenschaft, speziell der Medienrezeptionsforschung. In den 1980er Jahren haben wir hierzu das integrationswissenschaftliche Modell der „Strukturanalytischen Rezeptionsforschung“ entwickelt und dieses über die Jahre hinweg an unterschiedlichen Forschungsorten in zahlreichen Einzelstudien weiter ausgearbeitet. Verbunden hat uns, die Wiener Organisationssoziologin Ulrike Froschauer und die Baseler Mediensoziolog_innen, das anhaltende Interesse an method(-olog-)ischen Fragen.
In semantic fieldwork, it is common to use a language other than the language under investigation for presenting linguistic materials to the language consultants, e.g. discourse contexts in acceptability judgment tasks. Previous works commenting on the use of a ‘meta-language’ or ‘language of wider communication’ in this sense (AnderBois and Henderson 2015; Matthewson 2004) have argued that this practice is not methodologically inferior to the exclusive use of the object language for elicitation, but that the fieldworker needs to be alert to potential influences of the meta-language or, indeed, the object language, on the elicited judgments. Thus, the choice of a language for presenting discourse contexts is an integral component of fieldwork methodology. This paper provides a research report with a focus on this component. It describes a multilingual fieldwork setting offering several potential meta-languages, which the fieldworker and the consultants master to varying degrees. The choice of the languages in this setting is discussed with regard to methodological, social and practical considerations and related to selected, more general methodological questions regarding semantic fieldwork practice.
Esipuhe/Preface
(2020)
The theme of the AFinLA 2020 Yearbook Methodological turns in applied language studies is discussed in this introductory article from three interrelated perspectives, variously addressed in the three plenary presentations at the AFinLA Autumn Symposium 2019 as well as in the thirteen contributions to the yearbook. In the first set of articles presented, the authors examine the role and impact of technological development on the study of multimodal digital and non-digital contexts and discourses and ensuing new methods. The second set of studies in the yearbook revisits issues of language proficiency, critically discussing relevant concepts and approaches. The third set of articles explores participation and participatory research approaches, reflecting on the roles of the researcher and the researched community.
In this chapter, we overview the specificity of comparisons made within the perspective of Conversation Analysis (CA), and we position them in relation to other fields. We introduce the analytical mentality, methodology, and procedures of CA, and we show how we used it for the analysis of OKAY in this volume.
Syntactic theory has tended to vacillate between implausible methodological extremes. Some linguists hold that our theories are accountable solely for the corpus of attested utterances; others assume our subject matter is unobservable intuitive feelings about sentences. Both extremes should be rejected. The subject matter of syntax is neither past utterance production nor the functioning of inaccessible mental machinery; it is normative - a system of tacitly grasped constraints defining correctness of structure. There are interesting parallels between syntactic and moral systems, modulo the key difference that linguistic systems are diverse whereas morality is universal. The appropriate epistemology for justifying formulations of normative systems is familiar in philosophy: it is known as the method of reflective equilibrium.
This is an introduction to a special issue of Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America. It offers a characterization of neology and describes the Globalex-sponsored workshop at which the papers in the issue originated. It provides an overview of the papers, which treat lexicographical neology and neological lexicography in Danish, Dutch, Estonian, Frisian, Greek, Korean, Spanish, and Swahili and address relevant aspects of lexicography in those languages, presenting state-of-the-art research into neology and ideas about modern lexicographic treatment of neologisms in various dictionary types.
This paper discusses the technological and methodological challenges in creating and sharing HAMATAC, the Hamburg Map Task Corpus. The first version of the corpus, consisting of 24 recordings with orthographic transcriptions and metadata, is publicly available. A second version featuring different types of linguistic annotation is in progress. I will describe how the various software tools and data formats of the EXMARaLDA system were used for transcription and multi-level annotation, to compile recordings and transcriptions into a corpus and manage metadata, to publish the corpus, and how they can be used for carrying out corpus queries (KWIC) and analyses. Some recurrent issues in corpus building and sharing and the interaction of technological and methodological aspects will be illustrated using HAMATAC.