L3: Lexik empirisch und digital
Refine
Document Type
- Article (32)
- Part of a Book (25)
- Other (7)
- Preprint (4)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Book (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (32)
- Deutsch (29)
- Wortschatz (16)
- COVID-19 (13)
- Geschlechtergerechte Sprache (10)
- Lexikostatistik (9)
- Online-Medien (9)
- Wörterbuch (9)
- Vielfalt (8)
- Datenanalyse (7)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (43)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (28)
- Postprint (12)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (13)
- Wilhelm Fink (6)
- de Gruyter (6)
- IDS-Verlag (4)
- Cornell University (3)
- Erich Schmidt (3)
- Narr Francke Attempto (3)
- De Gruyter (2)
- Friedrich (2)
- LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ (2)
Filtern, Explorieren, Vergleichen: neue Zugriffsstrukturen und instruktive Potenziale von OWIDplus
(2023)
OWIDplus, das Zusatzangebot zur Wörterbuchplattform OWID, vereint verschiedenste lexikalische Datenbanken, Korpustools und visuell aufbereitete Analysen, die mithilfe von Textsuche und Kategorienfiltern so sortiert werden können, dass Benutzer*innen leicht die für sie interessanten Projekte entdecken können. Eine tiefergehende Beschäftigung mit den Einzelprojekten zeigt, wie bei aller oberflächlicher Ähnlichkeit oder gemeinsamen Themenbereichen ganz unterschiedliche methodische Zugänge zu sprachlichen Daten gewählt worden sind und wie Methodik und Forschungsfrage stets aufeinander abgestimmt werden müssen. Die Vielzahl potenzieller Forschungsfragen führt so unweigerlich zu einer Diversität von Projekten und somit einer Heterogenität, die, so hoffen die Autor*innen, in OWIDplus greifbar wird.
This paper analyses intensification in German digitally-mediated communication (DMC) using a corpus of YouTube comments written by young people (the NottDeuYTSch corpus). Research on intensification in written language has traditionally focused on two grammatical aspects: syntactic intensification, i.e. the use of particles and other lexical items and morphological intensification, i.e. the use of compounding. Using a wide variety og examples from the corpus, the paper identifies novel ways that have been used for intensification in DMC, and suggests a new taxonomy of classification for future analysis of intensification.
One of the fundamental questions about human language is whether all languages are equally complex. Here, we approach this question from an information-theoretic perspective. We present a large scale quantitative cross-linguistic analysis of written language by training a language model on more than 6500 different documents as represented in 41 multilingual text collections consisting of ~ 3.5 billion words or ~ 9.0 billion characters and covering 2069 different languages that are spoken as a native language by more than 90% of the world population. We statistically infer the entropy of each language model as an index of what we call average prediction complexity. We compare complexity rankings across corpora and show that a language that tends to be more complex than another language in one corpus also tends to be more complex in another corpus. In addition, we show that speaker population size predicts entropy. We argue that both results constitute evidence against the equi-complexity hypothesis from an information-theoretic perspective.
This replication study aims to investigate a potential bias toward addition in the German language, building upon previous findings of Winter and colleagues who identified a similar bias in English. Our results confirm a bias in word frequencies and binomial expressions, aligning with these previous findings. However, the analysis of distributional semantics based on word vectors did not yield consistent results for German. Furthermore, our study emphasizes the crucial role of selecting appropriate translational equivalents, highlighting the significance of considering language-specific factors when testing for such biases for languages other than English.
Korpus
(2021)
In den Sprach- als auch Literaturwissenschaften versteht man unter Korpora (Plur. Korpora, die / Sing. Korpus, das) ganz allgemein Textsammlungen. Nach Lemnitzer und Zinsmeister (2010, S. 40) ist ein Korpus: „[…] eine Sammlung [authentischer] schriftlicher oder gesprochener Äußerungen in einer oder mehreren Sprachen“. Die Zusammenstellung erfolgt nach verschiedenen wissenschaftlichen Kriterien, die sich am zu untersuchenden Gegenstand orientieren (Bsp. 1: Soll strategische Kommunikation in politischen Reden analysiert werden, so wird ein Korpus aus ‚Politischen Reden‘ zusammengestellt, die strategisch/kommunikative Praktiken enthalten – Bsp. 2: Für die Analyse von Modalpartikeln im Fremdsprachenerwerb wird ein Korpus aus transkribierten Redebeiträgen verschiedener Erwerbsstufen benötigt). Prinzipiell kann ein Korpus auch analog (gedruckt) vorliegen und manuell ausgewertet werden – In der empirischen Linguistik ist ein Korpus aber i. d. R. immer ein digitales (maschinenlesbares) Korpus, das automatisiert (mittels Software) ausgewertet wird.
The representative full-text digitalized HetWiK corpus is composed of 140 manually annotated texts of the German Resistance between 1933 and 1945. This includes both well-known and relatively unknown documents, public writings, like pamphlets or memoranda, as well as private texts, e.g. letters, journal or prison entries and biographies. Thus the corpus represents the diverse groups as well as the heterogeneity of verbal resistance and allows the study of resistance in relation to the language usage. The HetWiK corpus can be used free of charge. A detailed register of the individual texts and further information about the tagset can be found on the project-homepage (german). In addition to the CATMA5 XML-format we provide a standoff-JSON format and CEC6-Files (CorpusExplorer) - so you can export the HetWiK corpus in different formats.
Neologisms, i.e., new words or meanings, are finding their way into everyday language use all the time. In the process, already existing elements of a language are recombined or linguistic material from other languages is borrowed. But are borrowed neologisms accepted similarly well by the speech community as neologisms that were formed from “native” material? We investigate this question based on neologisms in German. Building on the corresponding results of a corpus study, we test the hypothesis of whether “native” neologisms are more readily accepted than those borrowed from English. To do so, we use a psycholinguistic experimental paradigm that allows us to estimate the degree of uncertainty of the participants based on the mouse trajectories of their responses. Unexpectedly, our results suggest that the neologisms borrowed from English are accepted more frequently, more quickly, and more easily than the “native” ones. These effects, however, are restricted to people born after 1980, the so-called millenials. We propose potential explanations for this mismatch between corpus results and experimental data and argue, among other things, for a reinterpretation of previous corpus studies.
Ziel dieses Projekts ist es, Sprachdaten so nah wie möglich am Jetzt zu erheben und analysierbar zu machen. Wir möchten, dass möglichst viele Menschen, nicht nur Sprachwissenschaftlerinnen und Sprachwissenschaftler, in die Lage versetzt werden, Sprachdaten zu explorieren und zu nutzen. Hierzu erheben wir ein Korpus, d. h. eine aufbereitete Sammlung von Sprachdaten von RSS-Feeds deutschsprachiger Onlinequellen. Wir zeichnen die Entwicklung der Analysewerkzeuge von einem Prototyp hin zur aktuellen Form der Anwendung nach, die eine komplette Reimplementierung darstellt. Dabei gehen wir auf die Architektur, einige Analysebeispiele sowie Erweiterungsmöglichkeiten ein. Fragen der Skalierbarkeit und Performanz stehen dabei im Mittelpunkt. Unsere Darstellungen lassen sich daher auf andere Data-Science-Projekte verallgemeinern.
It was recently suggested in a study published in Nature Human Behaviour that the historical loosening of American culture was associated with a trade-off between higher creativity and lower order. To this end, Jackson et al. generate a linguistic index of cultural tightness based on the Google Books Ngram corpus and use this index to show that American norms loosened between 1800 and 2000. While we remain agnostic toward a potential loosening of American culture and a statistical association with creativity/order, we show here that the methods used by Jackson et al. are neither suitable for testing the validity of the index nor for establishing possible relationships with creativity/order.
In a previous study published in Nature Human Behaviour, Varnum and Grossmann claim that reductions in gender inequality are linked to reductions in pathogen prevalence in the United States between 1951 and 2013. Since the statistical methods used by Varnum and Grossmann are known to induce (seemingly) significant correlations between unrelated time series, so-called spurious or non-sense correlations, we test here whether the statistical association between gender inequality and pathogens prevalence in its current form also is the result of mis-specified models that do not correctly account for the temporal structure of the data. Our analysis clearly suggests that this is the case. We then discuss and apply several standard approaches of modelling time-series processes in the data and show that there is, at least as of now, no support for a statistical association between gender inequality and pathogen prevalence.