Angewandte Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Book (163)
- Part of a Book (86)
- Article (57)
- Part of Periodical (25)
- Other (5)
- Review (4)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Image (1)
Language
- German (327)
- English (19)
- Multiple languages (2)
Keywords
- Deutsch (222)
- Rechtschreibung (151)
- Schule (136)
- Wörterbuch (134)
- Schriftsprache (56)
- Preußen (38)
- Rechtschreibunterricht (30)
- Sprachgeschichte (26)
- Linguistik (24)
- Bibliographie (20)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (72)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (63)
- Postprint (7)
- Hybrides Open Access (2)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- de Gruyter (57)
- Weidmann (40)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (38)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (11)
- V&R unipress (10)
- Huhle (9)
- R. Oldenbourg (9)
- Metzler (8)
- Seidel (7)
- Volk und Wissen Verlags-G.M.B.H. (7)
This volume brings together contributions by international experts reflecting on Covid19-related neologisms and their lexicographic processing and representation. The papers analyze new words, new meanings of existing words, and new multiword units, where they come from, how they are transmitted (or differ) across languages, and how their use and meaning are reflected in dictionaries of all sorts. Recent trends in as many as ten languages are considered, including general and specialized language, monolingual as well as bilingual and printed as well as online dictionaries.
EFNIL, the European Federation of National Institutions for Language, promotes the standard languages and the linguistic diversity of the European countries as an essential characteristic of their cultural diversity and wealth. The 17th annual conference of EFNIL in Tallinn dealt with the relation between language and economy.
• Language politics often have economic intentions, the language use of the individual is embedded in economic conditions, languages seem to differ in their economic value. In recent years, economists and sociolinguists have developed models of describing these interdependencies.
• The interaction in multilingual settings needs professional handling. There are traditional instances such as language teaching or translation and new professional fields of the digital age such as multilingual databases. Lots of economic needs and opportunities appear in this field.
• Digitization and societal diversity are two elements leading to more successful interaction, assisted by the use of automatic everyday translation, the development of plain language etc.
This volume presents an extensive overview of the interplay of language and economy.
Kampf
(2022)
In darauf aufbauender, aber auch sich davon differenzierender Art und Weise, findet das Konzept Kampf ebenso im politischen Diskurs des Nationalsozialismus Anwendung. Während im Zweiten Weltkrieg vor allem die Bedeutung von ›Kampf als Gefecht‹ im militärischen Kontext hervorgebracht wurde, sind die Verwendungen von ›Kampf als Bemühung‹, ›Kampf als Engagement‹ bis hin zu ›Kampf als Heroismus‹ (vgl. Klemperer 2018: 13), verknüpft mit ›Kampf als Kontroverse‹, vordergründig für das Verständnis der politischen Bedeutung des Kampfkonzepts im Nationalsozialismus. Im Folgenden werden nach einer einführenden begriffsgeschichtlichen Betrachtung ausgehend von diskursiv realisierten Wortformen der Lexeme Kampf und kämpfen konzeptkonstituierende Gebrauchsweisen für die verschiedenen Akteursklassen NS-Apparat, integrierte Gesellschaft, Ausgeschlossene und Widerstand dargelegt.
In dieser Reihe teilen Tagungsteilnehmende ihre persönlichen Eindrücke vom Forum Citizen Science 2023 in Freiburg. Im zweiten Beitrag berichtet Rahaf Farag, wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin im Programmbereich Dokumentationszentrum der deutschen Sprache am IDS Mannheim, von spannenden Diskussionsrunden, projektübergreifenden Gemeinsamkeiten und der Vielfalt der Projektausrichtungen.
Conversation is usually considered to be grammatically simple, while academic writing is often claimed to be structurally complex, associated primarily with a greater use of dependent clauses. Our goal in the present paper is to challenge these stereotypes, based on the results of large-scale corpus investigations. We argue that both conversation and professional academic writing are grammatically complex but that their complexities are dramatically different. Surprisingly, the traditional view that complexity is realized through extensive clausal embedding leads to the conclusion that conversation is more complex than academic writing. In contrast, written academic discourse is actually much more ‘compressed’ than elaborated, and the complexities of academic writing are realized mostly as phrasal embedding rather than embedded clauses.