Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (272) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (120)
- Article (82)
- Conference Proceeding (35)
- Book (19)
- Part of Periodical (11)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Other (2)
- Review (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (118)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (28)
- Konversationsanalyse (19)
- Computerlinguistik (16)
- Englisch (11)
- Sprachgebrauch (11)
- Interaktion (10)
- Kontrastive Grammatik (10)
- Deutschland (9)
- Diskursanalyse (9)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (102)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (23)
- Postprint (15)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- de Gruyter (37)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (31)
- Narr (17)
- European Language Resources Association (8)
- Lang (8)
- De Gruyter (7)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (5)
- Verl. für Gesprächsforschung (5)
- Akademie Verlag (4)
- Springer (4)
Online dictionary use
(2012)
Der Beitrag untersucht aus interpretativ-soziolinguistischer Perspektive die verbalen Ressourcen, die ein Lehrer bei der Bearbeitung von kommunikativen Handlungsanforderungen im Unterricht einsetzt. Dabei wird insbesondere der Gebrauch segmentalphonetischer, prosodischer und sprachwahlbezogener Indizierungsmittel analysiert, und zwar einerseits in Bezug auf unterrichtstypische Anforderungen der Interaktionsorganisation sowie andererseits im Rahmen einer nicht rekurrenten und für den Lehrer merklich unerwarteten Anforderung, die bei der untersuchten Unterrichtsinteraktion entsteht.
The present contribution addresses an infrastructural issue of universal relevance, addressed in the specific context of the TEI. We describe a combination of open-source tools and an open-access approach to creating knowledge repositories that have been employed in building a bibliographic reference library for the “TEI for Linguists” special interest group (LingSIG). The authors argue that, for an initiative such as the TEI, it is important to choose open, freely available solutions. If these solutions have the advantage of attracting new users and promoting the initiative itself, so much the better, especially if it is done in a non-committal way: no one using the LingSIG bibliographic repository has to be a member of the LingSIG or a “TEI-er” in general.
Language attitudes may be differentiated into attitudes towards speakers and attitudes towards languages. However, to date, no systematic and differentiated instrument exists that measures attitudes towards language. Accordingly, we developed, validated, and applied the Attitudes Towards Languages (AToL) scale in four studies. In Study 1, we selected 15 items for the AToL scale, which represented the three dimensions of value, sound, and structure. The following studies replicated and validated the three-factor structure and differential mean profiles along the three dimensions for different languages (a) in a more diverse German sample (Study 2), (b) in different countries (Study 3), and (c) when participants based their evaluations on speech samples (Study 4). Moreover, we investigated the relation between the AToL dimensions and stereotypic speaker evaluations. Results confirm the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the AToL scale and its incremental value to mere speaker evaluations.