Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (239) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (111)
- Article (75)
- Conference Proceeding (27)
- Book (12)
- Part of Periodical (10)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Other (1)
- Review (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (114)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (25)
- Konversationsanalyse (16)
- Computerlinguistik (12)
- Sprachgebrauch (11)
- Kontrastive Grammatik (10)
- Diskursanalyse (9)
- Englisch (9)
- Deutschland (8)
- Interaktion (8)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (84)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (15)
- Postprint (10)
Reviewstate
Knowledge Acquisition with Natural Language Processing in the Food Domain: Potential and Challenges
(2012)
In this paper, we present an outlook on the effectiveness of natural language processing (NLP) in extracting knowledge for the food domain. We identify potential scenarios that we think are particularly suitable for NLP techniques. As a source for extracting knowledge we will highlight the benefits of textual content from social media. Typical methods that we think would be suitable will be discussed. We will also address potential problems and limits that the application of NLP methods may yield.
In this paper, we examine methods to extract different domain-specific relations from the food domain. We employ different extraction methods ranging from surface patterns to co-occurrence measures applied on different parts of a document. We show that the effectiveness of a particular method depends very much on the relation type considered and that there is no single method that works equally well for every relation type. As we need to process a large amount of unlabeled data our methods only require a low level of linguistic processing. This has also the advantage that these methods can provide responses in real time.
In this paper, we describe MLSA, a publicly available multi-layered reference corpus for German-language sentiment analysis. The construction of the corpus is based on the manual annotation of 270 German-language sentences considering three different layers of granularity. The sentence-layer annotation, as the most coarse-grained annotation, focuses on aspects of objectivity, subjectivity and the overall polarity of the respective sentences. Layer 2 is concerned with polarity on the word- and phrase-level, annotating both subjective and factual language. The annotations on Layer 3 focus on the expression-level, denoting frames of private states such as objective and direct speech events. These three layers and their respective annotations are intended to be fully independent of each other. At the same time, exploring for and discovering interactions that may exist between different layers should also be possible. The reliability of the respective annotations was assessed using the average pairwise agreement and Fleiss’ multi-rater measures. We believe that MLSA is a beneficial resource for sentiment analysis research, algorithms and applications that focus on the German language.
We present a gold standard for semantic relation extraction in the food domain for German. The relation types that we address are motivated by scenarios for which IT applications present a commercial potential, such as virtual customer advice in which a virtual agent assists a customer in a supermarket in finding those products that satisfy their needs best. Moreover, we focus on those relation types that can be extracted from natural language text corpora, ideally content from the internet, such as web forums, that are easy to retrieve. A typical relation type that meets these requirements are pairs of food items that are usually consumed together. Such a relation type could be used by a virtual agent to suggest additional products available in a shop that would potentially complement the items a customer has already in their shopping cart. Our gold standard comprises structural data, i.e. relation tables, which encode relation instances. These tables are vital in order to evaluate natural language processing systems that extract those relations.
In this paper, we examine methods to automatically extract domain-specific knowledge from the food domain from unlabeled natural language text. We employ different extraction methods ranging from surface patterns to co-occurrence measures applied on different parts of a document. We show that the effectiveness of a particular method depends very much on the relation type considered and that there is no single method that works equally well for every relation type. We also examine a combination of extraction methods and also consider relationships between different relation types. The extraction methods are applied both on a domain-specific corpus and the domain-independent factual knowledge base Wikipedia. Moreover, we examine an open-domain lexical ontology for suitability.
In this paper, we compare three different generalization methods for in-domain and cross-domain opinion holder extraction being simple unsupervised word clustering, an induction method inspired by distant supervision and the usage of lexical resources. The generalization methods are incorporated into diverse classifiers. We show that generalization causes significant improvements and that the impact of improvement depends on the type of classifier and on how much training and test data differ from each other. We also address the less common case of opinion holders being realized in patient position and suggest approaches including a novel (linguistically-informed) extraction method how to detect those opinion holders without labeled training data as standard datasets contain too few instances of this type.
We present an experimental approach to determining natural dimensions of story comparison. The results show that untrained test subjects generally do not privilege structural information. When asked to justify sameness ratings, they may refer to content, but when asked to state differences, they mostly refer to style, concrete events, details and motifs. We conclude that adequate formal models of narratives must represent such non-structural data.