Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (581)
- Conference Proceeding (561)
- Article (453)
- Book (66)
- Working Paper (26)
- Doctoral Thesis (21)
- Other (18)
- Part of Periodical (12)
- Preprint (12)
- Contribution to a Periodical (6)
Language
- English (1765) (remove)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (416)
- Deutsch (410)
- Computerlinguistik (161)
- Konversationsanalyse (138)
- Interaktion (116)
- Englisch (112)
- Annotation (97)
- Gesprochene Sprache (93)
- Automatische Sprachanalyse (75)
- Wörterbuch (73)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (961)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (248)
- Postprint (236)
- Ahead of Print (6)
- Preprint (5)
- Erstveröffentlichung (2)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (828)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (410)
- Peer-review (24)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (18)
- Verlags-Lektorat (14)
- Peer-Revied (8)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (6)
- Abschlussarbeit (Bachelor, Master, Diplom, Magister) (Bachelor, Master, Diss.) (3)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (2)
- Peer review (2)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (104)
- Benjamins (87)
- IDS-Verlag (81)
- Springer (63)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (56)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (46)
- European Language Resources Association (42)
- Oxford University Press (35)
- Elsevier (33)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (33)
"What makes this so complicated?" On the value of disorienting dilemmas in language instruction
(2017)
With the advent of mobile devices, mediatized political discourse became more dynamic. I assume that the microblog Twitter can be considered as a medium for spatial coordination during protests. Therefore, the case of neo-Nazi demonstrations and counter-protests in the city of Dresden that occurred in February 2012 is analysed. Data consists of microposts that occurred during the event. Quantitative analysis of hashtag and retweet frequencies was performed as well as qualitative speech act pattern analysis and a tempo-spatial discourse analysis on selected subsets of microposts. Results show that a common linguistic practice is verbal georeferencing and by that constructing space. Empirical analysis indicates a strong relation between communicational online space and physical offline place: Protest participants permanently reconfigure spatial context discursively and thus the contested protest area becomes a temporarily meaningful place.
"Standard language" is a contested concept, ideologically, empirically and theoretically. This is particularly true for a language such as German, where the standardization of the spoken language was based on the written standard and was established with respect to a communicative situation, i.e. public speech on stage (Bühnenaussprache), which most speakers never come across. As a consequence, the norms of the oral standard exhibit many features which are infrequent in the everyday speech even of educated speakers. This paper discusses ways to arrive at a more realistic conception of (spoken) standard German, which will be termed "standard usage". It must be founded on empirical observations of speakers linguistic choices in everyday situations. Arguments in favor of a corpus-based notion of standard have to consider sociolinguistic, political, and didactic concerns. We report on the design of a large study of linguistic variation conducted at the Institute for the German Language (project "Variation in Spoken German", Variation des gesprochenen Deutsch) with the aim of arriving at a representative picture of "standard usage" in contemporary German. It systematically takes into account both diatopic variation covering the multi-national space in which German an official language, and diastratic variation in terms of varying degrees of formality. Results of the study of phonetic and morphosyntactic variation are discussed. At least for German, a corpus-based notion of "standard usage" inevitably includes some degree of pluralism concerning areal variation, and it needs to do justice to register-based variation as well.
Speakers’ dialogical orientation to the particular others they talk to is implemented by practices of recipient-design. One such practice is the use of negation as a means to constrain interpretations of speaker’s actions by the partner. The paper situates this use of negation within the larger context of other recipient-designed uses of negation which negate assumptions the speaker makes about what the addressee holds to be true (second-order assumptions) or what the addressee assumes the speaker holds to be true (third- order assumptions). The focus of the study is on the ways in which speakers use negation to disclaim interpretations of their turns which partners have displayed or may possibly arrive at. Special emphasis is given to the positionally sensitive uses of negation, which may occur before, after or inserted between the nucleus actions whose interpretation is constrained by the negation. Interactional motivations and rhetorical potentials of the practice are pointed out, partly depending on the position of the negation vis-à-vis the nucleus action. The analysis shows that the concept of ‘recipient design’ is in need of distinctions which have not been in focus in prior research.