Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (18) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (18)
Keywords
- Computerlinguistik (9)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (8)
- Forschungsdaten (5)
- Metadatenmodell (4)
- Automatisches Beweisverfahren (3)
- Metadaten (3)
- Natürliche Sprache (3)
- Texttechnologie (3)
- Dateiformat (2)
- Datenformat (2)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (10)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (6)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (12)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (4)
- Peer-review (1)
Publisher
- CLARIN (3)
- Dagstuhl (2)
- Linköping University Electronic Press (2)
- European Language Resources Association (1)
- Gesellschaft für Sprachtechnologie and Computerlinguistik (1)
- Gesellschaft für Sprachtechnologie and Computerlinguistik e.V. (1)
- Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (1)
- Lang (1)
- Narr (1)
- Springer (1)
Interested in formally modelling similarity between narratives, we investigate judgements of similarity between narratives in a small corpus of film reviews and book–film comparisons. A main finding is that judgements tend to concern multiple levels of story representation at once. As these texts are pragmatically related to reception contexts, we find many references to reception quality and optimality. We conclude that current formal models of narrative can not capture the task of naturalistic narrative comparisons given in the analysed reviews, but that the development of models containing a more reception-oriented point of view will be necessary.
The understanding of story variation, whether motivated by cultural currents or other factors, is important for applications of formal models of narrative such as story generation or story retrieval. We present the first stage of an experiment to elicit natural narrative variation data suitable for evaluation with respect to story similarity, to qualitative and quantitative analysis of story variation, and also for data processing. We also present few preliminary results from the first stage of the experiment, using Red Riding Hood and Romeo and Juliet as base texts.
This paper discusses the semi-formal language of mathematics and presents the Naproche CNL, a controlled natural language for mathematical authoring. Proof Representation Structures, an adaptation of Discourse Representation Structures, are used to represent the semantics of texts written in the Naproche CNL. We discuss how the Naproche CNL can be used in formal mathematics, and present our prototypical Naproche system, a computer program for parsing texts in the Naproche CNL and checking the proofs in them for logical correctness.
This paper discusses computational linguistic methods for the semi-automatic analysis of modality interdependencies (the combination of complex resources such as speaking, writing, and visualizing; MID) in professional crosssituational interaction settings. The overall purpose of the approach is to develop models, methods, and a framework for the description and analysis of MID forms and functions. The paper describes work in progress—the development of an annotation framework that allows annotating different data and file formats at various levels, to relate annotation levels and entries independently of the given file format, and to visualize patterns.
From Proof Texts to Logic. Discourse Representation Structures for Proof Texts in Mathematics
(2009)
We present an extension to Discourse Representation Theory that can be used to analyze mathematical texts written in the commonly used semi-formal language of mathematics (or at least a subset of it). Moreover, we describe an algorithm that can be used to check the resulting Proof Representation Structures for their logical validity and adequacy as a proof.
Ein integriertes Datenbank-, Such- und Tagging-Tool (IDaSTo) wird vorgestellt, das sich besonders für Variablenanalysen, für Paralleltexte und für diachronische Untersuchungen eignet. Relevante Kategorien bzw. Variablen können individuell definiert, Tags frei im Text und auf verschiedenen Wegen gesetzt und ihre Häufigkeiten in den verlinkten Statistiken direkt abgerufen werden.
Accentuation, Uncertainty and Exhaustivity - Towards a Model of Pragmatic Focus Interpretation
(2010)
This paper presents a model of pragmatic focus interpretation that is assumed to be part of a complete language comprehension model and that is inspired by Levelt's language processing model. The model is derived from our empirical data on the role of accentuation, prosodic indicators of uncertainty and context for pragmatic focus interpretation. In its present state, the model is restricted to these data, but nevertheless generates predictions.
We present an experimental approach to determining natural dimensions of story comparison. The results show that untrained test subjects generally do not privilege structural information. When asked to justify sameness ratings, they may refer to content, but when asked to state differences, they mostly refer to style, concrete events, details and motifs. We conclude that adequate formal models of narratives must represent such non-structural data.