Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (18) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (18)
Keywords
- Annotation (18) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (9)
- Peer-Review (7)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (6)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2)
- ACL (1)
- Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (1)
- Extreme Markup Languages Conference (1)
- University of Illinois (1)
- University of Oulu (1)
- Universität Tübingen (1)
- Växjö University Press (1)
- ZDV Universität Tübingen (1)
We present SPLICR, the Web-based Sustainability Platform for Linguistic Corpora and Resources. The system is aimed at people who work in Linguistics or Computational Linguistics: a comprehensive database of metadata records can be explored in order to find language resources that could be appropriate for one’s specific research needs. SPLICR also provides an interface that enables users to query and to visualise corpora. The project in which the system is being developed aims at sustainably archiving the ca. 60 language resources that have been constructed in three collaborative research centres. Our project has two primary goals: (a) To process and to archive sustainably the resources so that they are still available to the research community in five, ten, or even 20 years time. (b) To enable researchers to query the resources both on the level of their metadata as well as on the level of linguistic annota-tions. In more general terms, our goal is to enable solutions that leverage the interoperability, reusability, and sustainability of heterogeneous collections of language resources.
Making CONCUR work
(2005)
The SGML feature CONCUR allowed for a document to be simultaneously marked up in multiple conflicting hierarchical tagsets but validated and interpreted in one tagset at a time. Alas, CONCUR was rarely implemented, and XML does not address the problem of conflicting hierarchies at all. The MuLaX document syntax is a non-XML syntax that enables multiply-encoded hierarchies by distinguishing different “layers” in the hierarchy by adding a layer ID as a prefix to the element names. The IDs tie all the elements in a single hierarchy together in an “annotation layer”. Extraction of a single annotation layer results in a well-formed XML document, and each annotation layer may be associated with an XML schema. The MuLaX processing model works on the nodes of one annotation layer at a time through Xpath-like navigation. CONCUR lives!
This paper deals with the problem of how to interrelate theory-specific treebanks and how to transform one treebank format to another. Currently, two approaches to achieve these goals can be differentiated. The first creates a mapping algorithm between treebank formats. Categories of a source format are transformed into a target format via a given set of general or language-specific mapping rules. The second relates treebanks via a transformation to a general model of linguistic categories, for example based on the EAGLES recommendations for syntactic annotations of corpora, or relying on the HPSG framework. This paper proposes a new methodology as a solution for these desiderata.
This paper describes a corpus of Japanese task-oriented dialogues, i.e. its data, annotations, analysis methodology and preliminary results for the modeling of co-referential phenomena. Current corpus based approaches to co-reference concentrate on textual data from English or other European languages. Hence, the emerging language-general models of co-reference miss input from dialogue data of non-European languages. We aim to fill this gap and contribute to a model of co-reference on various language-specific and language-general levels.
Research today is often performed in collaborated projects composed of project partners with different backgrounds and from different institutions and countries. Standards can be a crucial tool to help harmonizing these differences and to create sustainable resources. However, choosing a standard depends on having enough information to evaluate and compare different annotation and metadata formats. In this paper we present ongoing work on an interactive, collaborative website that collects information on standards in the field of linguistics as a means to guide interested researchers.
The paper discusses two topics: firstly an approach of using multiple layers of annotation is sketched out. Regarding the XML representation this approach is similar to standoff annotation. A second topic is the use of heterogeneous linguistic resources (e.g., XML annotated documents, taggers, lexical nets) as a source for semiautomatic multi-dimensional markup to resolve typical linguistic issues, dealing with anaphora resolution as a case study.
Contents:
1. Michal Křen: Recent Developments in the Czech National Corpus, S. 1
2. Dan Tufiş, Verginica Barbu Mititelu, Elena Irimia, Stefan Dumitrescu, Tiberiu Boros, Horia Nicolai Teodorescu: CoRoLa Starts Blooming – An update on the Reference Corpus of Contemporary Romanian Language, S. 5
3. Sebastian Buschjäger, Lukas Pfahler, Katharina Morik: Discovering Subtle Word Relations in Large German Corpora, S. 11
4. Johannes Graën, Simon Clematide: Challenges in the Alignment, Management and Exploitation of Large and Richly Annotated Multi-Parallel Corpora, S. 15
5. Stefan Evert, Andrew Hardie: Ziggurat: A new data model and indexing format for large annotated text corpora, S. 21
6. Roland Schäfer: Processing and querying large web corpora with the COW14 architecture, S. 28
7. Jochen Tiepmar: Release of the MySQL-based implementation of the CTS protocol, S. 35