Syntax
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (106)
- Article (31)
- Book (18)
- Conference Proceeding (7)
- Review (4)
- Part of Periodical (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- German (145)
- English (24)
- Portuguese (2)
- French (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (172)
Keywords
- Deutsch (141)
- Syntax (54)
- Verb (18)
- Semantik (16)
- Grammatik (13)
- Kontrastive Syntax (11)
- Satz (11)
- Wortstellung (11)
- Argumentstruktur (10)
- Satzgefüge (10)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (50)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (44)
- Postprint (9)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Schwann (37)
- de Gruyter (23)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (18)
- Stauffenburg (8)
- Niemeyer (6)
- Buske (5)
- Narr Francke Attempto (5)
- De Gruyter (3)
- Groos (3)
- iudicium (3)
Der Blick auf die Syntax und generell auf die Grammatik ist traditionell aszendent, 'von unten nach oben' gerichtet: Einer Wortgrammatik folgt eine Satzgrammatik und dieser eventuell eine Textgrammatik. Doch wir schreiben und sprechen weder in Wörtern noch in Sätzen, sondern wir produzieren Texte und Gespäche. Deshalb musste auch der diametral entgegengesetzte Blick, der zu einer deszendenten Grammatik fuhrt, möglich sein. Eine solche Grammatik liegt mit der Grammatischen Textanalyse (= GTA), einer funktionalen Syntax des Gegenwartsdeutschen vor, die das grammatische System 'von oben nach unten' - von der Text- (Textglieder) über die Satz- (Satzglieder) zur Wortgruppenebene (Wortgruppenglieder) - modelliert. Im Beitrag werden Grundlagen und Leitbegriffe der GTA vorgestellt und an ausgewählten Phänomenen exemplifiziert.
Ergänzungssätze
(1977)
In German linguistics, a traditional distinction is made between (i) prepositional objects (POs) and prepositional adverbials, and (ii), among the latter, between adverbial complements and adjuncts. As a contribution to the debate on points of contact and possible syntheses between valency-based and construction-based approaches to verb argument structure, a corpus-based constructionist account of German PO and PP adverbial verb argument structures involving the preposition vor ‘in front of’ is developed. It is argued that ‘desemanticised’ PO-uses of vor are markers of inherently meaningful verb argument structure constructions that form a transparently motivated network comprising both PO and PP adverbial patterns. Analyses are presented for five interrelated families of vor constructions within the overall network thus defined. Their meanings are shown to reflect an interplay of more concrete spatial meanings of the preposition and the lexical semantics of verbal fillers of these constructions. Once conventionalised, they are subject to regular processes of metaphorical and metonymic semantic extension that are tentatively unravelled to create an integrated semantic map of verbal vor-constructions in present day German.
Les liaisons dangereuses
(1971)
Standardly, verb-first (V1) conditionals are considered to be mere variants of wenn-conditionals; accordingly, left-peripheral V1-clauses are analyzed as embedded into the prefields of declarative apodosis clauses, just like their V-end counterparts. We challenge this view, proposing instead that dependent V1-clauses are syntactically unembedded/unintegrated, and, consequently, that postposed declarative apodosis clauses are either V2-declaratives with prefield ellipsis or V1-declaratives. We argue our case by presenting evidence that (i) wenn-clauses differ considerably from V1-clauses in semantic distribution, (ii) unlike wenn-clauses, V1-clauses do not meet the criteria for syntactic embedding, (iii) the alternatives entailed by (ii) for the structural analysis of a postposed apodosis both have empirical support. As for a syntactic analysis of V1-structures suited to these findings, we argue that a CP adjunction analysis is currently the best option available. We also point out connections between the semantic restrictions on V1-conditionals and the semantics of V1-interrogatives that are suggestive of a common semantic core, which raises hope that our background vision (ultimately, all dependent V-to-C clauses are semantically licensed substitutes for genuine subordinates) may also be true for V1-clauses.
Topologisches Satzmodell
(2014)