Quantitative Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (15)
- Part of a Book (6)
- Other (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Sprachstatistik (11)
- Deutsch (8)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (6)
- Wortschatz (6)
- COVID-19 (5)
- Lexikostatistik (5)
- Online-Medien (5)
- Sprachwandel (5)
- Vielfalt (5)
- Entropie (3)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (26) (remove)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (6)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (2)
- MDPI (2)
- Springer Nature (2)
- Buske (1)
- De Gruyter (1)
- Heidelberg University Publishing (1)
- MEITS (1)
- Mouton de Gruyter (1)
- Narr Francke Attempto (1)
This thesis consists of the following three papers that all have been published in international peer-reviewed journals:
Chapter 3: Koplenig, Alexander (2015c). The Impact of Lacking Metadata for the Measurement of Cultural and Linguistic Change Using the Google Ngram Data Sets—Reconstructing the Composition of the German Corpus in Times of WWII. Published in: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [doi:10.1093/llc/fqv037]
Chapter 4: Koplenig, Alexander (2015b). Why the quantitative analysis of dia-chronic corpora that does not consider the temporal aspect of time-series can lead to wrong conclusions. Published in: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [doi:10.1093/llc/fqv030]
Chapter 5: Koplenig, Alexander (2015a). Using the parameters of the Zipf–Mandelbrot law to measure diachronic lexical, syntactical and stylistic changes – a large-scale corpus analysis. Published in: Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. [doi:10.1515/cllt-2014-0049]
Chapter 1 introduces the topic by describing and discussing several basic concepts relevant to the statistical analysis of corpus linguistic data. Chapter 2 presents a method to analyze diachronic corpus data and a summary of the three publications. Chapters 3 to 5 each represent one of the three publications. All papers are printed in this thesis with the permission of the publishers.
In dem Beitrag wird der Frage nachgegangen, inwiefern die Frequenz eines Wortes mit seiner orthographischen Richtigschreibung zusammenhangt. Werden häufige Wörter öfter und früher richtig geschrieben? Und welche Rolle spielt dabei die orthographische Regelhaftigkeit der Wortstrukturen? Unter Zuhilfenahme maschineller Analyseverfahren aus der Großstudie "Automatisierte Rechtschreibdiagnostik" (Fay/Berkling/Stüker 2012) werden diesbezuglich über 1000 Schülertexte von Klasse 2 bis 8 untersucht. Im Ergebnis werden zum einen einige Annahmen, die bislang vor allem auf Erfahrungswerten aus der sprachdidaktischen Arbeit fußten, empirisch bestätigt, zum anderen werden sie hinsichtlich spezifischer Rechtschreibphänomene differenziert und erweitert.
According to a widespread conception, quantitative linguistics will eventually be able to explain empirical quantitative findings (such as Zipf’s Law) by deriving them from highly general stochastic linguistic ‘laws’ that are assumed to be part of a general theory of human language (cf. Best (1999) for a summary of possible theoretical positions). Due to their formal proximity to methods used in the so-called exact sciences, theoretical explanations of this kind are assumed to be superior to the supposedly descriptive-only approaches of linguistic structuralism and its successors. In this paper I shall try to argue that on close inspection such claims turn out to be highly problematic, both on linguistic and on science-theoretical grounds.
The article investigates the conditions under which the w-relativizer was appears instead of the d-relativzer das in German relative clauses. Building on Wiese 2013, we argue that was constitutes the elsewhere case that applies when identification with the antecedent cannot be established by syntactic means via upward agreement with respect to phi-features. Corpuslinguistic results point to the conclusion that this is the case whenever there is no lexical nominal in the antecedent that, following Geach 1962 and Baker 2003, supplies a criterion of identity needed to establish sameness of reference between the antecedent and the relativizer.