Lexikografie
Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (16) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (7)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (9)
- Lexikografie (9)
- Deutsch (8)
- Online-Wörterbuch (7)
- Wörterbuch (7)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikografie (4)
- Paronym (4)
- Einsprachiges Wörterbuch (3)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (3)
- Lexik des gesprochen Deutsch (LeGeDe) (3)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (9)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (6)
- Postprint (3)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (9)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (5)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (4)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (2)
- Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (2)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (1)
- Cambridge University Press (1)
- Democritus University of Thrace (1)
- Erich Schmidt (1)
- Karolinum (1)
- Oxford University Press (1)
- Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Darmstadt (1)
Dictionary usage research views dictionaries primarily as tools for solving linguistic problems. A large proportion of dictionary use now takes place online and can thus be easily monitored using tracking technologies. Using the data gathered through tracking usage data, we hope to optimize user experiences of dictionaries and other linguistic resources. Usage statistics are also used for external evaluation of linguistic resources. In this paper, we pursue the following three questions from a quantitative perspective: (1) What new insights can we gain from collecting and analysing usage data? (2) What limitations of the data and/or the collection process do we need to be aware of? (3) How can these insights and limitations inform the development and evaluation of linguistic resources?
The main aim of this contribution is to present the range of lexicographic information from LeGeDe, an electronic prototype for lexical and interactional features of spoken German. The focus lies on the detailed description of the different lexicographical information classes using illustrative examples and figures from the resource. In addition to highlighting the lexicographic microstructure and providing an overview of the outer texts and the multimedia information offer, the contribution also presents detailed background data on the conception of the LeGeDe resource. Innovative aspects and possible applications are outlined and forward-looking desiderata are offered.
In this paper, the basic assumptions are presented against the background of the development of a corpus-based method to determine suitable headword candidates for the LeGeDe-prototype (LeGeDe= Lexik des gesprochenen Deutsch), a lexicographical resource on spoken German. In a first quantitatively oriented step, potential one-word headword candidates are identified with the help of frequency class comparisons from a corpus for spoken (FOLK) and a subset from a corpus for written German (DEREKO). Qualitative analyses based on a project-specifically defined sample of data from the FOLK corpus lead to multi-word headword candidates. The results of the qualitative analyses were also compared with the results of studies from the research literature as well as (quantitative-orientated) bi- and trigram analyses. In their multi-word form, these candidates are particularly characterized by the fact that they assume a very special interactional function in the (authentic) interaction and have to be described as a whole unit. The paper explains this combined procedure, which was extracted in the LeGeDe-project for the appointment of headword candidates.
Die LeGeDe-Ressource: korpusbasierte lexikografische Einblicke und anwendungsorientierte Ausblicke
(2021)
Der Beitrag stellt die lexikografische Online-Ressource LeGeDe, den ersten korpusbasierten Prototypen für Besonderheiten der Lexik des Deutschen in der Interaktion vor. Dabei werden sowohl die Herausforderungen an das innovative Projekt thematisiert als auch Möglichkeiten für einen anwendungsorientierten Nutzen im DaF- und DaZ-Bereich diskutiert und als Ausblick Desiderata für die weitere Beschäftigung mit der lexikografischen Kodifizierung gesprochensprachlicher Spezifika des Deutschen aufgezeigt.
Alleviating pain is good and abandoning hope is bad. We instinctively understand how words like alleviate and abandon affect the polarity of a phrase, inverting or weakening it. When these words are content words, such as verbs, nouns, and adjectives, we refer to them as polarity shifters. Shifters are a frequent occurrence in human language and an important part of successfully modeling negation in sentiment analysis; yet research on negation modeling has focused almost exclusively on a small handful of closed-class negation words, such as not, no, and without. A major reason for this is that shifters are far more lexically diverse than negation words, but no resources exist to help identify them. We seek to remedy this lack of shifter resources by introducing a large lexicon of polarity shifters that covers English verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Creating the lexicon entirely by hand would be prohibitively expensive. Instead, we develop a bootstrapping approach that combines automatic classification with human verification to ensure the high quality of our lexicon while reducing annotation costs by over 70%. Our approach leverages a number of linguistic insights; while some features are based on textual patterns, others use semantic resources or syntactic relatedness. The created lexicon is evaluated both on a polarity shifter gold standard and on a polarity classification task.