Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (27) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (17)
- Part of a Book (6)
- Article (1)
- Book (1)
- Other (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- English (27) (remove)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (27)
- Corpus linguistics (11)
- Corpus technology (6)
- Texttechnologie (6)
- Datenmanagement (4)
- Internet (4)
- Deutsch (3)
- Englisch (3)
- Prädikat (3)
- Web corpora (3)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (24)
- Postprint (2)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (20)
- Peer-review (4)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (12)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (2)
- University of Birmingham (2)
- Charles University (1)
- De Gruyter (1)
- Editions Tradulex (1)
- European Network of e-Lexicography (ENeL) (1)
- Izdatel´stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (1)
- Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (1)
- Linköping University (1)
The Manatee corpus management system on which the Sketch Engine is built is efficient, but unable to harness the power of today’s multiprocessor machines. We describe a new, compatible implementation of Manatee which we develop in the Go language and report on the performance gains that we obtained.
This article describes a series of ongoing efforts at the Stanford Literary Lab to manage a large collection of literary corpora (~40 billion words). This work is marked by a tension between two competing requirements – the corpora need to be merged together into higher-order collections that can be analyzed as units; but, at the same time, it’s also necessary to preserve granular access to the original metadata and relational organization of each individual corpus. We describe a set of data management practices that try to accommodate both of these requirements – Apache Spark is used to index data as Parquet tables on an HPC cluster at Stanford. Crucially, the approach distinguishes between what we call “canonical” and “combined” corpora, a variation on the well-established notion of a “virtual corpus” (Kupietz et al., 2014; Jakubíek et al., 2014; van Uytvanck, 2010).
This paper outlines the broad research context and rationale for a new international comparable corpus (ICC). The ICC is to be largely modelled on the text categories and their quantities the International Corpus of English with only a few changes. The corpus will initially begin with nine European languages but others may join in due course. The paper reports on those and other agreements made at the inaugural planning meeting in Prague on 22-23 June 2017. It also sets out the project’s goals for its first two years.
Many (modernist) works of literature can be understood by their associativeness, be it constructed or “free”. This network-like character of (modernist) literature has often been addressed by terms like “free association”, connotation”, “context” or “intertext”. This paper proposes an experimental and exemplary approach to intraconnect a literary corpus of the Austrian writer Ilse Aichinger with semantic web-technologies to enable interactive explorations of word-associations.
The paper presents best practices and results from projects dedicated to the creation of corpora of computer-mediated communication and social media interactions (CMC) from four different countries. Even though there are still many open issues related to building and annotating corpora of this type, there already exists a range of tested solutions which may serve as a starting point for a comprehensive discussion on how future standards for CMC corpora could (and should) be shaped like.
In the first volume of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Gries (2005. Null-hypothesis significance testing of word frequencies: A follow-up on Kilgarriff. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2). doi:10.1515/ cllt.2005.1.2.277. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cllt.2005.1.issue-2/cllt.2005. 1.2.277/cllt.2005.1.2.277.xml: 285) asked whether corpus linguists should abandon null-hypothesis significance testing. In this paper, I want to revive this discussion by defending the argument that the assumptions that allow inferences about a given population – in this case about the studied languages – based on results observed in a sample – in this case a collection of naturally occurring language data – are not fulfilled. As a consequence, corpus linguists should indeed abandon null-hypothesis significance testing.
This paper presents a short insight into a new project at the "Institute for the German Language” (IDS) (Mannheim). It gives an insight into some basic ideas for a corpus-based dictionary of spoken German, which will be developed and compiled by the new project "The Lexicon of spoken German” (Lexik des gesprochenen Deutsch, LeGeDe). The work is based on the "Research and Teaching Corpus of Spoken German” (Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus Gesprochenes Deutsch, FOLK), which is implemented in the "Database for Spoken German” (Datenbank für Gesprochenes Deutsch, DGD). Both resources, the database and the corpus, have been developed at the IDS.