Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (5) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (5)
Keywords
- Maschinelles Lernen (5) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (4)
Die zentrale Aufgabenstellung des Verbundprojektes TextTransfer (Pilot) war eine Machbarkeitsprüfung für die Entwicklung eines Text-Mining-Verfahrens, mit dem Forschungsergebnisse automatisiert auf Hinweise zu Transfer- und Impactpotenzialen untersucht werden können. Das vom Projektkoordinator IDS verantwortete Teilprojekt konzentrierte sich dabei auf die Entwicklung der methodischen Grundlagen, während der Projektpartner TIB vornehmlich für die Bereitstellung eines geeigneten Datensatzes verantwortlich war. Solchen automatisierten Verfahren liegen zumeist textbasierte Daten als physisches Manifest wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse zugrunde, die im Falle von TextTransfer (Pilot) als empirische Grundlage herangezogen wurden. Das im Verbund zur Anwendung gebrachte maschinelle Lernverfahren stützte sich ausschließlich auf deutschsprachige Projektendberichte öffentlich geförderter Forschung. Diese Textgattung eignet sich insbesondere hinsichtlich ihrer öffentlichen Verfügbarkeit bei zuständigen Gedächtnisorganisationen und aufgrund ihrer im Vergleich zu anderen Formaten wissenschaftlicher Publikation relativen strukturellen wie sprachlichen Homogenität. TextTransfer (Pilot) ging daher grundsätzlich von der Annahme struktureller bzw. sprachlicher Ähnlichkeit in Berichtstexten aus, bei denen der Nachweis tatsächlich erfolgten Transfers zu erbringen war. Im Folgenden wird in diesen Fällen von Texten bzw. textgebundenen Forschungsergebnissen mit Transfer- und Impactpotenzial gesprochen werden. Es wurde ferner postuliert, dass sich diese Indizien von sprachlichen Eigenschaften in Texten zu Projekten ohne nachzuweisenden bzw. ggf. auch niemals erfolgtem, aber potenziell möglichem Transfer oder Impact unterscheiden lassen. Mit einer Verifizierung dieser Annahmen war es möglich, Transfer- oder Impactwahrscheinlichkeiten in großen Mengen von Berichtsdaten ohne eingehende Lektüre zu prognostizieren.
Corpus REDEWIEDERGABE
(2020)
This article presents the corpus REDEWIEDERGABE, a German-language historical corpus with detailed annotations for speech, thought and writing representation (ST&WR). With approximately 490,000 tokens, it is the largest resource of its kind. It can be used to answer literary and linguistic research questions and serve as training material for machine learning. This paper describes the composition of the corpus and the annotation structure, discusses some methodological decisions and gives basic statistics about the forms of ST&WR found in this corpus.
The sentiment polarity of an expression (whether it is perceived as positive, negative or neutral) can be influenced by a number of phenomena, foremost among them negation. Apart from closed-class negation words like no, not or without, negation can also be caused by so-called polarity shifters. These are content words, such as verbs, nouns or adjectives, that shift polarities in their opposite direction, e. g. abandoned in “abandoned hope” or alleviate in “alleviate pain”. Many polarity shifters can affect both positive and negative polar expressions, shifting them towards the opposing polarity. However, other shifters are restricted to a single shifting direction. Recoup shifts negative to positive in “recoup your losses”, but does not affect the positive polarity of fortune in “recoup a fortune”. Existing polarity shifter lexica only specify whether a word can, in general, cause shifting, but they do not specify when this is limited to one shifting direction. To address this issue we introduce a supervised classifier that determines the shifting direction of shifters. This classifier uses both resource-driven features, such as WordNet relations, and data-driven features like in-context polarity conflicts. Using this classifier we enhance the largest available polarity shifter lexicon.
This paper presents experiments on sentence boundary detection in transcripts of spoken dialogues. Segmenting spoken language into sentence-like units is a challenging task, due to disfluencies, ungrammatical or fragmented structures and the lack of punctuation. In addition, one of the main bottlenecks for many NLP applications for spoken language is the small size of the training data, as the transcription and annotation of spoken language is by far more time-consuming and labour-intensive than processing written language. We therefore investigate the benefits of data expansion and transfer learning and test different ML architectures for this task. Our results show that data expansion is not straightforward and even data from the same domain does not always improve results. They also highlight the importance of modelling, i.e. of finding the best architecture and data representation for the task at hand. For the detection of boundaries in spoken language transcripts, we achieve a substantial improvement when framing the boundary detection problem as a sentence pair classification task, as compared to a sequence tagging approach.
Beyond Citations: Corpus-based Methods for Detecting the Impact of Research Outcomes on Society
(2020)
This paper proposes, implements and evaluates a novel, corpus-based approach for identifying categories indicative of the impact of research via a deductive (top-down, from theory to data) and an inductive (bottom-up, from data to theory) approach. The resulting categorization schemes differ in substance. Research outcomes are typically assessed by using bibliometric methods, such as citation counts and patterns, or alternative metrics, such as references to research in the media. Shortcomings with these methods are their inability to identify impact of research beyond academia (bibliometrics) and considering text-based impact indicators beyond those that capture attention (altmetrics). We address these limitations by leveraging a mixed-methods approach for eliciting impact categories from experts, project personnel (deductive) and texts (inductive). Using these categories, we label a corpus of project reports per category schema, and apply supervised machine learning to infer these categories from project reports. The classification results show that we can predict deductively and inductively derived impact categories with 76.39% and 78.81% accuracy (F1-score), respectively. Our approach can complement solutions from bibliometrics and scientometrics for assessing the impact of research and studying the scope and types of advancements transferred from academia to society.