Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (12)
- Article (6)
- Part of a Book (6)
- Book (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
- Review (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (33)
Keywords
- Computerlinguistik (33) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (22)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (3)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- European Language Resources Association (3)
- de Gruyter (3)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (2)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (2)
- Linköping University Electronic Press (2)
- CLARIN (1)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (1)
- Institut für Kommunikationsforschung und Phonetik (1)
- L'Harmattan (1)
Die zentrale Aufgabenstellung des Verbundprojektes TextTransfer (Pilot) war eine Machbarkeitsprüfung für die Entwicklung eines Text-Mining-Verfahrens, mit dem Forschungsergebnisse automatisiert auf Hinweise zu Transfer- und Impactpotenzialen untersucht werden können. Das vom Projektkoordinator IDS verantwortete Teilprojekt konzentrierte sich dabei auf die Entwicklung der methodischen Grundlagen, während der Projektpartner TIB vornehmlich für die Bereitstellung eines geeigneten Datensatzes verantwortlich war. Solchen automatisierten Verfahren liegen zumeist textbasierte Daten als physisches Manifest wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse zugrunde, die im Falle von TextTransfer (Pilot) als empirische Grundlage herangezogen wurden. Das im Verbund zur Anwendung gebrachte maschinelle Lernverfahren stützte sich ausschließlich auf deutschsprachige Projektendberichte öffentlich geförderter Forschung. Diese Textgattung eignet sich insbesondere hinsichtlich ihrer öffentlichen Verfügbarkeit bei zuständigen Gedächtnisorganisationen und aufgrund ihrer im Vergleich zu anderen Formaten wissenschaftlicher Publikation relativen strukturellen wie sprachlichen Homogenität. TextTransfer (Pilot) ging daher grundsätzlich von der Annahme struktureller bzw. sprachlicher Ähnlichkeit in Berichtstexten aus, bei denen der Nachweis tatsächlich erfolgten Transfers zu erbringen war. Im Folgenden wird in diesen Fällen von Texten bzw. textgebundenen Forschungsergebnissen mit Transfer- und Impactpotenzial gesprochen werden. Es wurde ferner postuliert, dass sich diese Indizien von sprachlichen Eigenschaften in Texten zu Projekten ohne nachzuweisenden bzw. ggf. auch niemals erfolgtem, aber potenziell möglichem Transfer oder Impact unterscheiden lassen. Mit einer Verifizierung dieser Annahmen war es möglich, Transfer- oder Impactwahrscheinlichkeiten in großen Mengen von Berichtsdaten ohne eingehende Lektüre zu prognostizieren.
The TEI has served for many years as a mature annotation format for corpora of different types, including linguistically annotated data. Although it is based on the consensus of a large community, it does not have the legal status of a standard. During the last decade, efforts have been undertaken to develop definitive de jure standards for linguistic data that not only act as a normative basis for the exchange of language corpora but also address recent advancements in technology, such as web-based standards, and the use of large and multiply annotated corpora.
In this article we will provide an overview of the process of international standardization and discuss some of the international standards currently being developed under the auspices of ISO/TC 37, a technical committee called “Terminology and other Language and Content Resources”. After that the relationship between the TEI Guidelines and these specifications, according to their formal model, notation format, and annotation model, will be discussed. The conclusion of the paper provides recommendations for dealing with language corpora.
Wikipedia is a valuable resource, useful as a lingustic corpus or a dataset for many kinds of research. We built corpora from Wikipedia articles and talk pages in the I5 format, a TEI customisation used in the German Reference Corpus (Deutsches Referenzkorpus - DeReKo). Our approach is a two-stage conversion combining parsing using the Sweble parser, and transformation using XSLT stylesheets. The conversion approach is able to successfully generate rich and valid corpora regardless of languages. We also introduce a method to segment user contributions in talk pages into postings.
Discourse segmentation is the division of a text into minimal discourse segments, which form the leaves in the trees that are used to represent discourse structures. A definition of elementary discourse segments in German is provided by adapting widely used segmentation principles for English minimal units, while considering punctuation, morphology, sytax, and aspects of the logical document structure of a complex text type, namely scientific articles. The algorithm and implementation of a discourse segmenter based on these principles is presented, as well an evaluation of test runs.
Der vorliegende Band befasst sich mit dem Stand und der Entwicklung von Forschungsinfrastrukturen für die germanistische Linguistik und einigen angrenzenden Bereichen. Einen zentralen Aspekt dabei bildet die Notwendigkeit, Kooperativität in der Wissenschaft im institutionellen Sinne, aber auch in Hinsicht auf die wissenschaftliche Praxis zu organisieren. Dies geschieht in Verbunden als Kooperationsstrukturen, wobei Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachtechnologie miteinander verbunden werden. Als zentraler Forschungsressource kommen dabei Korpora und ihrer Erschließung durch spezielle, linguistisch motivierte Informationssysteme besondere Bedeutung zu. Auf der Ebene der Daten werden durch Annotations- und Modellierungsstandards die Voraussetzung für eine nachhaltige Nutzbarkeit derartiger Ressourcen geschaffen.
The QUEST (QUality ESTablished) project aims at ensuring the reusability of audio-visual datasets (Wamprechtshammer et al., 2022) by devising quality criteria and curating processes. RefCo (Reference Corpora) is an initiative within QUEST in collaboration with DoReCo (Documentation Reference Corpus, Paschen et al. (2020)) focusing on language documentation projects. Previously, Aznar and Seifart (2020) introduced a set of quality criteria dedicated to documenting fieldwork corpora. Based on these criteria, we establish a semi-automatic review process for existing and work-in-progress corpora, in particular for language documentation. The goal is to improve the quality of a corpus by increasing its reusability. A central part of this process is a template for machine-readable corpus documentation and automatic data verification based on this documentation. In addition to the documentation and automatic verification, the process involves a human review and potentially results in a RefCo certification of the corpus. For each of these steps, we provide guidelines and manuals. We describe the evaluation process in detail, highlight the current limits for automatic evaluation and how the manual review is organized accordingly.
Metadata provides important information relevant both to finding and understanding corpus data. Meaningful linguistic data requires both reasonable annotations and documentation of these annotations. This documentation is part of the metadata of a dataset. While corpus documentation has often been provided in the form of accompanying publications, machinereadable metadata, both containing the bibliographic information and documenting the corpus data, has many advantages. Metadata standards allow for the development of common tools and interfaces. In this paper I want to add a new perspective from an archive’s point of view and look at the metadata provided for four learner corpora and discuss the suitability of established standards for machine-readable metadata. I am are aware that there is ongoing work towards metadata standards for learner corpora. However, I would like to keep the discussion going and add another point of view: increasing findability and reusability of learner corpora in an archiving context.
The article focuses on determining responsible parties and the division of potential liability arising from sharing language data (LD) containing personal data (PD). A key issue here is to identify who has to make sure and guarantee the GDPR compliance. The authors aim to answer 1) whether an individual researcher is a controller and 2) whether sharing LD results in joint controllership or separate controllership (whether the data's transferee becomes the controller, the joint controller or the processor). The article also analyses the legal relations of parties involved in data sharing and potential liability. The final section outlines data sharing in the CLARIN context. The analysis serves as a preliminary analytical background for redesigning the CLARIN contractual framework for sharing data.
N-grams are of utmost importance for modern linguistics and language technology. The legal status of n-grams, however, raises many practical questions. Traditionally, text snippets are considered copyrightable if they meet the originality criterion, but no clear indicators as to the minimum length of original snippets exist; moreover, the solutions adopted in some EU Member States (the paper cites German and French law as examples) are considerably different. Furthermore, recent developments in EU law (the CJEU's Pelham decision and the new right of press publishers) also provide interesting arguments in this debate. The paper presents the existing approaches to the legal protection of n-grams and tries to formulate some clear guidelines as to the length of n-grams that can be freely used and shared.
Vorwort
(2007)
This paper describes the TEI-based ISO standard 2462:2016 “Transcription of spoken language” and other formats used within CLARIN for spoken language resources. It assesses the current state of support for the standard and the interoperability between these formats and with relevant tools and services. The main idea behind the paper is that a digital infrastructure providing language resources and services to researchers should also allow the combined use of resources and/or services from different contexts. This requires syntactic and semantic interoperability. We propose a solution based on the ISO/TEI format and describe the necessary steps for this format to work as an exchange format with basic semantic interoperability for spoken language resources across the CLARIN infrastructure and beyond.
We discovered several recurring errors in the current version of the Europarl Corpus originating both from the web site of the European Parliament and the corpus compilation based thereon. The most frequent error was incompletely extracted metadata leaving non-textual fragments within the textual parts of the corpus files. This is, on average, the case for every second speaker change. We not only cleaned the Europarl Corpus by correcting several kinds of errors, but also aligned the speakers’ contributions of all available languages and compiled every- thing into a new XML-structured corpus. This facilitates a more sophisticated selection of data, e.g. querying the corpus for speeches by speakers of a particular political group or in particular language combinations.
As a part of the ZuMult-project, we are currently modelling a backend architecture that should provide query access to corpora from the Archive of Spoken German (AGD) at the Leibniz-Institute for the German Language (IDS). We are exploring how to reuse existing search engine frameworks providing full text indices and allowing to query corpora by one of the corpus query languages (QLs) established and actively used in the corpus research community. For this purpose, we tested MTAS - an open source Lucene-based search engine for querying on text with multilevel annotations. We applied MTAS on three oral corpora stored in the TEI-based ISO standard for transcriptions of spoken language (ISO 24624:2016). These corpora differ from the corpus data that MTAS was developed for, because they include interactions with two and more speakers and are enriched, inter alia, with timeline-based annotations. In this contribution, we report our test results and address issues that arise when search frameworks originally developed for querying written corpora are being transferred into the field of spoken language.
In this article, we examine the current situation of data dissemination and provision for CMC corpora. By that we aim to give a guiding grid for future projects that will improve the transparency and replicability of research results as well as the reusability of the created resources. Based on the FAIR guiding principles for research data management, we evaluate the 20 European CMC corpora listed in the CLARIN CMC Resource family, individuate successful strategies among the existing corpora and establish best practices for future projects. We give an overview of existing approaches to data referencing, dissemination and provision in European CMC corpora, and discuss the methods, formats and strategies used. Furthermore, we discuss the need for community standards and offer recommendations for best practices when creating a new CMC corpus.
FnhdC/HTML und FnhdC/S
(2007)
We evaluate a graph-based dependency parser on DeReKo, a large corpus of contemporary German. The dependency parser is trained on the German dataset from the SPMRL 2014 Shared Task which contains text from the news domain, whereas DeReKo also covers other domains including fiction, science, and technology. To avoid the need for costly manual annotation of the corpus, we use the parser’s probability estimates for unlabeled and labeled attachment as main evaluation criterion. We show that these probability estimates are highly correlated with the actual attachment scores on a manually annotated test set. On this basis, we compare estimated parsing scores for the individual domains in DeReKo, and show that the scores decrease with increasing distance of a domain to the training corpus.
The availability of electronic corpora of historical stages of languages has been wel- comed as possibly attenuating the inherent problem of diachronic linguistics, i.e. that we only have access to what has chanced to come down to us - the problem which was memorably named by Labov (1992) as one of “Bad Data”. However, such corpora can only give us access to an increased amount ot historical material and this can essentially still only be a partial and possibly distorted picture of the actual language at a particular period of history. Corpora can be improved by taking a more representative sample of extant texts if these are available (as they are in significant number for periods after the invention of printing). But, as examples from the recently compiled GerManC corpus of seventeenth and eighteenth century German show, the evidence from such corpora can still fail to yield definitive answers to our questions about earlier stages of a language. The data still require expert interpretation, and it is important to be realistic about what can legitimately be expected from an electronic historical corpus.