Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (60) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (34)
- Article (16)
- Book (4)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Preprint (1)
- Review (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (60)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (54)
- Deutsch (27)
- Sprachdaten (10)
- Korpuslinguistik (7)
- Annotation (6)
- Germanistik (6)
- Fremdsprache (5)
- Gesprochene Sprache (5)
- Interaktion (5)
- Konversationsanalyse (5)
Publicationstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (36)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (24)
- Postprint (3)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (38)
- Peer-Review (21)
Publisher
In this article, we provide an insight into the development and application of a corpus-lexicographic tool for finding neologisms that are not yet listed in German dictionaries. As a starting point, we used the words listed in a glossary of German neologisms surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. These words are lemma candidates for a new dictionary on COVID-19 discourse in German. They also provided the database used to develop and test the NeoRate tool. We report on the lexicographic work in our dictionary project, the design and functionalities of NeoRate, and describe the first test results with the tool, in particular with regard to previously unregistered words. Finally, we discuss further development of the tool and its possible applications.
Dieser Werkstattbericht zeigt anhand verschiedener korpusbasierter Ressourcen, wie Fragen zu sprachlichen Phänomenen, die für Sprachlernende nicht oder nur unzureichend dokumentiert sind, empirisch beantwortet werden können. Besonderes Augenmerk wird dabei auf OWIDplusLIVE gelegt. Hierbei handelt es sich um ein Werkzeug zur tagesaktuellen Analyse von Token (einzelne Wortformen/Lemmata) und Bi-/Trigrammen (zwei bzw. drei direkt aufeinander folgende Token). Über eine Anbindung an KorAP können zudem Belege aus dem DeReKo (Deutsches Referenzkorpus) abgerufen und analysiert werden.
The International Comparable Corpus (ICC) (Kirk/Čermáková 2017; Čermáková et al. 2021) is an open initiative which aims to improve the empirical basis for contrastive linguistics by compiling comparable corpora for many languages and making them as freely available as possible as well as providing tools with which they can easily be queried and analysed. In this contribution we present the first release of written language parts of the ICC which includes corpora for Chinese, Czech, English, German, Irish (partly), and Norwegian. Each of the released corpora contains 400k words distributed over 14 different text categories according to the ICC specifications. Our poster covers the design basics of the ICC, its TEI encoding, a demonstration of using the ICC via different query tools, and an outlook on future plans.
Similar to the European Reference Corpus EuReCo (Kupietz et al. 2020), ICC follows the approach of reusing existing linguistic resources wherever possible in order to cover as many languages as possible with realistic effort in as short a time as possible. In contrast to EuReCo, however, comparable corpus pairs are not defined dynamically in the usage phase, but the compositions of the corpora are fixed in the ICC design. The approaches are thus complementary in this respect. The design principles and composition of the ICC are based on those of the International Corpus of English (ICE) (Greenbaum (ed.) 1996), with the deviation that the ICC includes the additional text category blog post and excludes spoken legal texts (see Čermáková et al. 2021 for details). ICC’s fixed-design approach has the advantage that all single-language corpora in the ICC have the same composition with respect to the selected text types and that this guarantees that the selected broad spectrum of potential influencing variables for linguistic variation is always represented. The disadvantage, however, is that this can only be achieved for quite small corpora and that the generalisability of comparative findings based on the ICC corpora will often need to be checked on larger monolingual corpora or translation corpora (Čermáková/Ebeling/Oksefjell Ebeling forthcoming). Arguing that such issues with comparability and representativeness are inevitable, in one way or the other, and need to be dealt with, our poster will discuss and exemplify the text selections in more detail.
Das Austrian Media Corpus (amc) ist mit derzeit rund 11 Mrd. Token eines der größten deutschsprachigen Korpora journalistischer Prosa. Es bietet damit weitreichende Analysemöglichkeiten für eine Vielzahl sprachwissenschaftlicher Aspekte, wie z. B. die Analyse grammatischer, orthographischer und lexikalischer Variation oder die Erforschung diskurslinguistischer wie attitudinal-perzeptiver Fragestellungen. In diesem Beitrag geben wir Einblicke in Beispielanalysen zu Standard(schrift)sprache auf Basis des amc sowie deren Bedeutung für die Erforschung von Sprachvariation in Österreich, um das enorme Potenzial des Korpus für sprachwissenschaftliche Fragestellungen zu illustrieren.
The NottDeuYTSch corpus is a freely available collection of YouTube comments written under German-speaking videos by young people between 2008 and 2018. The article uses the NottDeuYTSch corpus to investigate how YouTube comments can be used to produce learning materials and how corpora of Digitally-Mediated Communication can benefit intermediate learners of German. The article details the effects of authentic communication within YouTube comments on teenage learners, examining how they can influence the psycholinguistic factors of motivation, foreign language anxiety, and willingness to communicate. The article also discusses the benefits and limitations of using authentic corpus material for the development of teaching material.
This paper introduces the Nottinghamer Korpus deutscher YouTube-Sprache (‘The Nottingham German YouTube Language Corpus’ - or NottDeuYTSch corpus). The corpus comprises over 33 million words, taken from roughly 3 million YouTube comments published between 2008 and 2018, written by a young, German-speaking demographic. The NottDeuYTSch corpus provides an authentic and representative linguistic snapshot of young German speakers and offers significant opportunities for in-depth research in several linguistic fields, such as lexis, morphology, syntax, orthography, multilingualism, and conversational and discursive analysis.
Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Prozesse der Datenerhebung, -aufbereitung und geplanten Veröffentlichung eines Teilkorpus des vom österreichischen Wissenschaftsfonds (FWF) finanzierten Spezialforschungsbereichs (SFB) „Deutsch in Österreich. Variation – Kontakt – Perzeption“ (FWF F060). Die Daten werden v. a. aus variationslinguistischer, kontaktlinguistischer wie auch perzeptionslinguistischer Perspektive analysiert, wofür eigene Tools entwickelt wurden, die – ebenso wie das Korpus selbst – mittelfristig der interessierten Öffentlichkeit zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
Der Beitrag skizziert die Genese und Komplexität des Konzepts ‚Usuelle Wortverbindung‘ (UWV) vor dem Hintergrund der korpuslinguistischen Wende. Die Möglichkeit, sprachliche Massendaten untersuchen zu können, erbrachte neue Einsichten in Hinblick auf Status, Form, Funktion, Festigkeit und Variabilität dieser zentralen Wortschatzeinheiten – gleichzeitig aber auch in Hinblick auf ihre Unschärfen und vielfachen Überlappungen. Eine der folgenreichsten Erkenntnisse ist, dass UWVs auf vorgeprägten Schemata und Mustern basieren und in ein komplexes Netz von Ausdrücken ähnlicher Art eingebettet sind. Für die Aneignung sprachlichen Wissens ist das Verstehen solcher primär funktionalen Musterbildungen elementar.
In many European languages, propositional arguments (PAs) can be realized as different types of structures. Cross-linguistically, complex structures with PAs show a systematic correlation between the strength of the semantic bond and the syntactic union (cf. Givón 2001; Wurmbrand/Lohninger 2023). Also, different languages show similarities with respect to the (lexical) licensing of different PAs (cf. Noonan 1985; Givón 2001; Cristofaro 2003 on different predicate types). However, on a more fine-grained level, a variation across languages can be observed both with respect to the syntactic-semantic properties of PAs as well as to their licensing and usage. This presentation takes a multi-contrastive view of different types of PAs as syntactic subjects and objects by looking at five European languages: EN, DE, IT, PL and HU. Our goal is to identify the parameters of variation in the clausal domain with PAs and by this to contribute to a better understanding of the individual language systems on the one hand and the nature of the linguistic variation in the clausal domain on the other hand. Phenomena and Methodology: We investigate the following types of PAs: direct object (DO) clauses (1), prepositional object (PO) clauses (2), subject clauses (3), and nominalizations (4, 5). Additionally, we discuss clause union phenomena (6, 7). The analyzed parameters include among others finiteness, linear position of the PA, (non) presence of a correlative element, (non) presence of a complementizer, lexical-semantic class of the embedding verb. The phenomena are analyzed based on corpus data (using mono- and multilingual corpora), experimental data (acceptability judgement surveys) or introspective data.