Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (24) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (10)
- Article (8)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
- Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (24)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (20)
- Deutsch (9)
- Annotation (5)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (4)
- Korpuslinguistik (4)
- corpus linguistics (4)
- Datensatz (3)
- Gesprochene Sprache (3)
- Sprachdaten (3)
- tokenization (3)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (20)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (4)
- Postprint (2)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (24) (remove)
Publisher
Zum Verschmelzungsverhalten von definitem Artikel und Präposition in der Schriftsprache des Deutschen liegen bereits diverse Erkenntnisse vor, wohingegen die Kenntnislage für die gesprochene Sprache noch unzureichend ist. Die vorliegende Untersuchung widmet sich diesem Desiderat und analysiert Präposition-Artikel-Kombinationen anhand von Daten aus FOLK, um die linguistische Beschreibung dieser Struktur voranzutreiben. In der durchgeführten Korpusanalyse werden die Auftretenshäufigkeiten synthetischer und analytischer Präposition-Artikel-Kombinationen verglichen und Gebrauchsbesonderheiten auf syntaktisch-lexikalischer und pragmatischer Ebene herausgearbeitet.
So far, Sepedi negations have been considered more from the point of view of lexicographical treatment. Theoretical works on Sepedi have been used for this purpose, setting as an objective a neat description of these negations in a (paper) dictionary. This paper is from a different perspective: instead of theoretical works, corpus linguistic methods are used: (1) a Sepedi corpus is examined on the basis of existing descriptions of the occurrences of a relevant verb, looking at its negated forms from a purely prescriptive point of view; (2) a "corpus-driven" strategy is employed, looking only for sequences of negation particles (or morphemes) in order to list occurring constructions, without taking into account the verbs occurring in them, apart from their endings. The approach in (2) is only intended to show a possible methodology to extend existing theories on occurring negations. We would also like to try to help lexicographers to establish a frequency-based order of entries of possible negation forms in their dictionaries by showing them the number of respective occurrences. As with all corpus linguistic work, however, we must regard corpus evidence not as representative, but as tendencies of language use that can be detected and described. This is especially true for Sepedi, for which only few and small corpora exist. This paper also describes the resources and tools used to create the necessary corpus and also how it was annotated with part of speech and lemmas. Exploring the quality of available Sepedi part-of-speech taggers concerning verbs, negation morphemes and subject concords may be a positive side result.
Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Motivation und Ziele hinter der Initiative Europäisches Referenzkorpus EuReCo. Ausgehend von den Desiderata, die sich aufgrund der Defizite verfügbarer Forschungsdaten wie monolinguale Korpora, Parallelkorpora und Vergleichskorpora für den Sprachvergleich ergeben, werden die bisherigen und die laufenden Arbeiten im Rahmen von EuReCo präsentiert und anhand vergleichender deutsch-rumänischer Kookkurrenzanalysen neue Perspektiven für kontrastive Korpuslinguistik, die die EuReCo-Initiative öffnet, skizziert.
Kontrastive Korpuslinguistik versteht sich als eine Bezeichnung für sprachvergleichende Studien, deren Ergebnisse mit Analysen sprachlicher Daten erreicht und empirisch fundiert sind. Die Bezeichnung contrastive corpus linguistics für eine neue, sich entwickelnde Disziplin wurde 1996 von Karin Aijmer und Bengt Altenberg (Schmied 2009: 1142) eingeführt. Der Einsatz der sprachlichen Korpora bei der Beschreibung kontrastiver Studien bedeutet in den 1990er-Jahren für die kontrastive Linguistik eine Wiederbelebung, nachdem die weit gesteckten Ziele und Hoffnungen in den 50er- und 60er-Jahren, die mit der Fremdsprachendidaktik zusammenhingen, vor etwa 50 Jahren aufgegeben wurden.
Kontrastive Korpuslinguistik
(2022)
The QUEST (QUality ESTablished) project aims at ensuring the reusability of audio-visual datasets (Wamprechtshammer et al., 2022) by devising quality criteria and curating processes. RefCo (Reference Corpora) is an initiative within QUEST in collaboration with DoReCo (Documentation Reference Corpus, Paschen et al. (2020)) focusing on language documentation projects. Previously, Aznar and Seifart (2020) introduced a set of quality criteria dedicated to documenting fieldwork corpora. Based on these criteria, we establish a semi-automatic review process for existing and work-in-progress corpora, in particular for language documentation. The goal is to improve the quality of a corpus by increasing its reusability. A central part of this process is a template for machine-readable corpus documentation and automatic data verification based on this documentation. In addition to the documentation and automatic verification, the process involves a human review and potentially results in a RefCo certification of the corpus. For each of these steps, we provide guidelines and manuals. We describe the evaluation process in detail, highlight the current limits for automatic evaluation and how the manual review is organized accordingly.
Metadata provides important information relevant both to finding and understanding corpus data. Meaningful linguistic data requires both reasonable annotations and documentation of these annotations. This documentation is part of the metadata of a dataset. While corpus documentation has often been provided in the form of accompanying publications, machinereadable metadata, both containing the bibliographic information and documenting the corpus data, has many advantages. Metadata standards allow for the development of common tools and interfaces. In this paper I want to add a new perspective from an archive’s point of view and look at the metadata provided for four learner corpora and discuss the suitability of established standards for machine-readable metadata. I am are aware that there is ongoing work towards metadata standards for learner corpora. However, I would like to keep the discussion going and add another point of view: increasing findability and reusability of learner corpora in an archiving context.
Vorgestellt wird das Korpus deutschsprachiger Songtexte als innovative Sprachdatenquelle für interdisziplinäre Untersuchungsszenarien und speziell für den Einsatz im Fremd- und Zweitsprachenunterricht. Die Ressource dokumentiert Eigenschaften konzeptioneller Schriftlichkeit und konzeptioneller Mündlichkeit und erlaubt empirisch begründete Analysen sprachlicher Phänomene bzw. Tendenzen in den Texten moderner Popmusik. Vorgestellt werden Design, Annotationen und Anwendungsbeispiele des in thematische und autorenspezifische Archive stratifizierten Korpus.
This paper describes a method for extracting collocation data from text corpora based on a formal definition of syntactic structures, which takes into account not only the POS-tagging level of annotation but also syntactic parsing (syntactic treebank model) and introduces the possibility of controlling the canonical form of extracted collocations based on statistical data on forms with different properties in the corpus. Specifically, we describe the results of extraction from the syntactically tagged Gigafida 2.1 corpus. Using the new method, 4,002,918 collocation candidates in 81 syntactic structures were extracted. We evaluate the extracted data sample in more detail, mainly in relation to properties that affect the extraction of canonical forms: definiteness in adjectival collocations, grammatical number in noun collocations, comparison in adjectival and adverbial collocations, and letter case (uppercase and lowercase) in canonical forms. The conclusion highlights the potential of the methodology used for the grammatical description of collocation and phrasal syntax and the possibilities for improving the model in the process of compilation of a digital dictionary database for Slovene.
This paper describes a method for automatic identification of sentences in the Gigafida corpus containing multi-word expressions (MWEs) from the list of 5,242 phraseological units, which was developed on the basis of several existing open-access lexical resources for Slovene. The method is based on a definition of MWEs, which includes information on two levels of corpus annotation: syntax (dependency parsing) and morphology (POS tagging), together with some additional statistical parameters. The resulting lexicon contains 12,358 sentences containing MWEs extracted from the corpus. The extracted sentences were analysed from the lexicographic point of view with the aim of establishing canonical forms of MWEs and semantic relations between them in terms of variation, synonymy, and antonymy.