Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Document Type
- Book (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Historische Sprachwissenschaft (2)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (2)
- Adjektiv (1)
- Deutsch (1)
- Gefühl (1)
- Konferenz (1)
- Kongress (1)
- Lexikalisierung (1)
- Verb (1)
Reviewstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (3) (remove)
Publisher
- Narr (3)
KonfeThe volume contains 23 papers read at the international conference “Historical Corpora 2012”, which was hosted by the LOEWE Research Cluster “Digital Humanities” of the State of Hesse at the University of Frankfurt on December 6-8, 2012. All in all, the conference comprised 27 individual papers plus five keynote speeches, three of which have been integrated in the present volume, too.
The contributions, which have been duly updated, take a broad variety of perspectives on “historical corpora”, including their structuring, their management, and various facets of the increase of knowledge they can provide. In addition to this, the papers cover a large amount of different languages, German – in nearly all its historical facettes – being the most widely addressed; however, the range of vernaculars treated extends far beyond that, across the Romance languages into the Caucasus and from the recent past down into antiquity. Differences also concern the linguistic interests prevailing in the papers, which may focus on syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, lexicological or other phenomena.
Wenn sich ein Partizip II in Bedeutung und Gebrauch verselbstständigt, dann sprechen Linguisten von einer Lexikalisierung. Es entsteht ein Pseudo-Partizip, das nicht mehr als Verbform identifiziert werden kann. Doch wie systematisch lassen sich Partizipien erfassen, deren Verhalten teilweise auf Lexikalisierung schließen lässt, die aber zugleich eine transparente verbale Basis im Gegenwartsdeutschen aufzuweisen scheinen?
Dieser Band beschreibt Partizipien II von Experiencer-Objekt-Verben wie verwirrt, frustriert oder begeistert auf Grundlage ihrer besonderen Semantik und analysiert den Gebrauch von 21 ausgewählten Exemplaren mit korpuslinguistischen Mitteln sowohl qualitativ als auch quantitativ. Im Mittelpunkt stehen die Verwendungen in Kombination mit den Kopula- oder Passivhilfsverben sein und werden sowie mit dem Kausativverb machen, in denen die Partizipialformen in verbalem und/oder adjektivischem Gebrauch vorliegen. Dabei ergeben sich einige bemerkenswerte Ergebnisse und bisher nicht wahrgenommene Korrelationen.
Investigating the history of a language depends on fragmentary sources, but electronic corpora offer the possibility of alleviating the problem of ‘bad data’. However they cannot overcome it totally, and crucial questions thus arise of the optimal architecture for such a corpus, the problem of how representative even a large corpus can be of actual language use at a particular time, and how a historical corpus can best be annotated and provided with tools to maximize its usefulness as a resource for future researchers. Immense strides have been made in recent years in addressing these questions, with exciting new methods and technological advances. The papers in this volume, which were presented at a conference on New Methods in Historical Corpora (Manchester 2011), exemplify the range of these developments in investigating the diachrony of languages as distinct as English, German, Latin, Spanish, French and Slovene and developing appropriate tools for the analysis of historical corpora in these languages.