Grammatikforschung
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (25)
- Article (7)
- Book (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (37)
Keywords
- Syntax (37) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (37) (remove)
Reviewstate
Publisher
Recent years have seen a growing interest in grammatical variation, a core explanandum of grammatical theory. The present volume explores questions that are fundamental to this line of research: First, the question of whether variation can always and completely be explained by intra- or extra-linguistic predictors, or whether there is a certain amount of unpredictable – or ‘free’ – grammatical variation. Second, the question of what implications the (in-)existence of free variation would hold for our theoretical models and the empirical study of grammar. The volume provides the first dedicated book-length treatment of this long-standing topic. Following an introductory chapter by the editors, it contains ten case studies on potentially free variation in morphology and syntax drawn from Germanic, Romance, Uralic and Mayan.
The special issue opens up a construction-grammatical perspective on (German) word formation phenomena and goes back to a DFG-funded conference of the same name, which we held at the University of Düsseldorf in December 2020. The aim is to bundle up for the first time research from the field of German linguistics that is oriented towards construction grammar, and thus to lay the foundation for a 'Construction Word Formation' (cf. Booij 2010) also in the German-speaking world. Furthermore, ‘Construction Word Formation’ as a discipline shall hereby be sharpened. In this context, construction grammar should not be seen as a radical alternative to traditional word formation approaches that completely reinvents the wheel, but rather as a further development that builds on traditional concepts such as the pattern term with prominent consideration of usage-based aspects.
This paper aims at investigating the usage of present subjunctive (Konjunktiv I), which is traditionally labelled as a feature of standard written language and therefore as typically occurring in communication genres based on it such as press texts and reporting, in everyday spoken German. Through an analysis of corpus data performed according to theory and method of Interactional Linguistics and encompassing private, institutional and public interactional domains, the paper will show how this particular verb form expresses different epistemic stances according to its syntactic embedment.
This thesis describes work in three areas: grammar engineering, computer-assisted language learning and grammar learning. These three parts are connected by the concept of a grammar-based language learning application. Two types of grammars are of concern. The first we call resource grammars, extensive descriptions a natural languages. Part I focuses on this kind of grammars. The other are domain-specific or application-specific grammars. These grammars only describe a fragment of natural language that is determined by the domain of a certain application. Domain-specific grammars are relevant for Part II and Part III. Another important distinction is between humans learning a new natural language using computational grammars (Part II) and computers learning grammars from example sentences (Part III). Part I of this thesis focuses on grammar engineering and grammar testing. It describes the development and evaluation of a computational resource grammar for Latin. Latin is known for its rich morphology and free word order, both have to be handled in a computationally efficient way. A special focus is on methods how computational grammars can be evaluated using corpus data. Such an evaluation is presented for the Latin resource grammar. Part II, the central part, describes a computer-assisted language learning application based on domain-specific grammars. The language learning application demonstrates how computational grammars can be used to guide the user input and how language learning exercises can be modeled as grammars. This allows us to put computational grammars in the center of the design of language learning exercises used to help humans learn new languages. Part III, the final part, is dedicated to a method to learn domain- or application-specific grammars based on a wide-coverage grammar and small sets of example sentences. Here a computer is learning a grammar for a fragment of a natural language from example sentences, potentially without any additional human intervention. These learned grammars can be based e.g. on the Latin resource grammar described in Part II and used as domain-specific lesson grammars in the language learning application described Part II.
Dieses Kapitel untersucht die syntaktischen Funktionen von vollen (nicht-pronominalen) Nominalphrasen (NPs) und die Funktionen der vier Kasus des Deutschen aus quantitativer Perspektive. Es wird vorgeschlagen, das Konzept der syntaktischen Funktion in grundlegendere Merkmale zu zerlegen. Dazu gehören der Typ desjenigen Elements, dem die NP untergeordnet ist, und die Art der Beziehung zwischen der NP und dem übergeordneten Element (ganz allgemein: Komplementation vs. Modifikation).
Datensatz Nominalphrasen
(2021)
Der Datensatz Nominalphrasen enthält Belege zu nichtpronominalen (d.h. vollen, lexikalischen) Nominalphrasen (NPs) mit einem Substantiv oder einer Nominalisierung als Kopf. Jeder Beleg ist in Bezug auf eine Reihe linguistisch relevanter Merkmale annotiert. Insgesamt enthält der Datensatz 8.137 Belegstellen. Nach dem Aussortieren von Fehlbelegen (siehe Spalten „valide“ und „nicht-valide_Begründung“) bleiben noch 7.813 einschlägige Belege. Die Suchanfrage erfolgte über das Kopfnomen; für Details zur Datenerhebung siehe Weber (2021a). Das Kopfnomen erscheint in der Spalte „Kopf_der_NP“. In manchen Fällen besteht die NP nur aus dem Kopfnomen, in den meisten Fällen geht sie aber darüber hinaus; sie erstreckt sich dann auf einen Teil des vorangehenden Kontexts (Spalte „Satzkontext_vor_Beleg“) und/oder des nachfolgenden Kontexts („Satzkontext_nach_Beleg“). Der Datensatz dient der Untersuchung der syntaktischen Funktionen von NPs (Weber 2021a) und der Determination in der NP (Weber 2021b).
Die vorliegende Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit den multiplen Referenzmöglichkeiten und der Multifunktionalität des deutschen Pronomens es, da es unter beiden Gesichtspunkten wesentliche Unterschiede zur maskulinen und femininen Form des Personalpronomens der 3. Person aufweist. So muss es beispielsweise nicht mit seinem Bezugsnomen hinsichtlich Genus- und Numerus kongruieren, es muss nicht einmal auf nominale Bezugsentitäten rekurrieren. Diese für ein Pronomen nicht-prototypischen Verweismöglichkeiten bedingen die Multifunktionalität von es, die innerhalb der germanistischen Linguistik rege diskutiert wird.
Validating the Performativity Hypothesis to Neg-Raising using corpus data: Evidence from Polish
(2021)
The present chapter investigates the relative order of attributive adjectives in German. Based on corpus data, our results corroborate previous findings that semantics is the most important factor in accounting for adjective order. Going beyond previous studies, we also consider coordinated structures (such as mit [[großem, verwildertem] Garten] ‘with (a) large, overgrown garden’), where both adjectives are of equal rank. While adjective order in embedded structures (mit [ schwierigem [ familiärem Hintergrund ]] ‘with (a) difficult domestic background’) can be predicted rather accurately on semantic grounds, we show that predictions can also be made for coordinated structures, albeit with lower accuracy. Using regression analysis, we examine how semantic factors interact with a number of other explanatory variables.