Fachsprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (29) (remove)
Language
- German (29)
Has Fulltext
- yes (29)
Keywords
- Deutsch (15)
- Fachsprache (9)
- Rechtssprache (6)
- Wissenschaftssprache (5)
- Kommunikation (3)
- Kongress (3)
- Gemeinsprache (2)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (2)
- Medizin (2)
- Politische Sprache (2)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (7)
- Peer-Review (5)
Publisher
Anhand eines Fallbeispiels wird gezeigt, dass in der praktischen Arbeit des EuGH Rechtsarbeit und Spracharbeit eng miteinander verflochten sind. Wenn es in einem strittigen Fall um die konkrete Ausarbeitung einer haltbaren Sachverhaltsbeschreibung geht, zeigt sich, dass die Rechtsarbeit und die Spracharbeit des Gerichts eigentlich identisch sind. In einem solchen Fall ist es für das Gericht nützlich und günstig, wenn es auf so viele sprachliche Formulierungen (auch in verschiedenen Sprachen) zurückgreifen kann wie möglich. Das Ziel ist, möglichst viele Interpretationen in Betracht zu ziehen, um das Urteil bestandssicher zu machen. In dieser Situation sind Vorschläge, das Sprachenspektrum, in dem der EuGH arbeitet, im Vorhinein und generell einzuschränken, kontraproduktiv.
The article aims to examine grammatical features and pragmatic concerns of communicating in the Sciences. In the research of certain languages, it became common to explaingrammatical features such as the usage of passive voice and nominal structures by communication requirements such as objectivity and precision. With the assumption that communication in Science is designed to help gain and spread new insight, the authors tried to integrateseveral approaches to pragmatic and grammatical features of communication. By discussing therelationship between the grammar of certain languages and of the corresponding commonlanguage, the article also places the subject of communication in the Sciences in the discipline oflanguage Variation.
Terminology practice in companies and its methods evolved over the course of the years. This process can be seen as a broadening of methods rather than a paradigm change. Although this development led to an improvement in the practice, many crucial problems still remain unsolved. In this article I point out the open questions in the current methodology and argue why they are essential for the success of terminology projects. Also, I present how these questions can be addressed by embedding the terminology in a broader discourse of language management and social psychology.
Statt Stadt Statt
(2013)