Bilingualismus / Mehrsprachigkeit
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (20) (remove)
Language
- German (14)
- English (4)
- Multiple languages (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (20)
Keywords
- Mehrsprachigkeit (12)
- Deutsch (6)
- Europa (6)
- Englisch (5)
- Nationalsprache (4)
- Sprachpolitik (3)
- Einsprachigkeit (2)
- Europäische Union (2)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache <Mannheim> (2)
- Kanada (2)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (20) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (17)
- Peer-Review (3)
Publisher
Kontrastiv-multilingual angelegte empirische Studien erfordern eine vergleichbare Datengrundlage. Je nachdem, welche Forschungsfragen im Zentrum der sprachvergleichenden Untersuchungen stehen, bieten sich entweder Parallelkorpora oder vergleichbare einzelsprachliche Korpora als Datengrundlage an. Dieser Beitrag verfolgt hauptsächlich das Ziel, die Herausforderungen aufzuzeigen, die die Arbeit mit vergleichbaren Korpora im multilingualen Sprachvergleich aufwirft. Dabei soll u.a. das Prinzip der Vergleichbarkeit von Korpora thematisiert und methodologische Vorschläge für konkrete empirisch angelegte sprachvergleichende Analysen vorgelegt werden. Die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der empirisch basierten quantitativen und qualitativen Analysearbeit werden durch die Präsentation einiger exemplarischer Forschungsfragen und -ergebnisse aufgezeigt. Einige Desiderata für zukünftige korpusbasierte Studien auf der Basis von vergleichbaren Korpora im multilingualen Raum schließen den Beitrag ab.
Even though the use of several languages has become more common in modern societies, it is important to find a common language in order to communicate economically (by the way, also with regard to economic success). So, of course, it is an advantage and a basic request in our national societies to be able to communicate by means of the national language(s). But looking a bit closer at the communicative demands of today one sees that there is a growing need to react to internal variation, and that a modern linguistic identity not only covers that fact, but also the fact, that English – in different forms – is part of a linguistic spectrum fitting a modern European communicative life. In the last years a communicative pattern is developing within an elite group of young academically educated people that is based on the use of English only, more or less ignoring the connection to the national linguistic surroundings, somehow kind of an alternative monolingualism. But looking at the communicative needs in our complex societies losing the ability to cope with different linguistic options in different communicative situations and to integrate this possibility into your linguistic identity is a rather restricted option – also in economic terms. And this even holds not taking into account the linguistic effect of modern migration.
Language shift after migration has been reported to occur within three generations. While this pattern holds in many cases there is also some counter evidence. In this paper, family documents from a German immigration community in Canada are investigated to trace individual decisions of language choice that contributed to an extended process of shift taking four generations and more than a century.
I nationale og curopa’iskc sprogpolitiske undersogelser savner man orte et tilt'redsstiIlende cmpirisk grundlag. De tilgsngelige data om den aktuelle Situation for sprogene i de forskelligc lande er heterogene. ufuldstEndige og delvist foraddede og derfor vanskelige at sammenligne over tid. EKNIL’s curoptciskc sprogbarometer. KLM, er et forsog pä al afhjxlpe denne Situation. KLM er baseret pä et omfattende spor- geskema om en bred vifte al’sproglige forhold som er egnet til at danne et billede at'sprogenes Status og sprogpolitiske praksisser i hvert enkelt land. fx sprogencs juridiske Status, sprogenes Status i undervis- ning og forskning, Situationen for minoritetssprog, sprogene i kulturen og i erhvervslivet. KLM gennem- tores med fä ärs mellemrum. Naervjerende artikel beskriver baggrunden og resultateme af KLM 2 (2007- 2011) som omfatler 23 europa’iske lande
Opening/Eröffnung/Aperture
(2012)
Migranten und ihre Sprachen
(2011)
Im Mittelpunkt des Beitrags steht eine Person, deren Identität wesentlich durch ihre Mehrsprachigkeit und Mehrkulturalität unter Dominanz des Deutsch-Russischen und ihren Beruf als Integrationsarbeiterin geprägt ist. Die lebenslange Entwicklung dieser Identität und ihre interpersonalen Bedingungen werden auf der Grundlage von sprachbiografischen Interviews und Proben deutsch- und russischsprachiger Kommunikation rekonstruiert. Die Diskussion dieser Entwicklung nimmt Bezug auf aktuelle Fragen der Vermittlung früher kindlicher Zweisprachigkeit und der gesellschaftlichen Gestaltung der sprachlichen Integration von Zuwanderern.
Moderm European Science and culture evolved in the process of emancipation of various national languages from medieval Latin. At present, this development from monolingualism to multilingualism seems to be reversed in several scientific disciplines and in higher education. The former linguistic diversity turns gradually into a modern monolingualism of scientific English, especially in the natural and some social sciences. A short-term consequence is that researchers and Professors with other first languages need extra time and sometimes money to prepare their publications and lectures in English. Long-term consequences are, among others, that all languages exept English are devaluated as media of science and learning and, thus, a diglossia might develop if only English be used for the important domains and other languages be limited to the domains of private communication and folklore. The way out can only be through a cultivation of at least bilingualism of researchers, Professors, and their students in the natural sciences and trilingualism in social sciences and the humanities.
Europäische Hochsprachen in der Klemme. Zwischen globalem Englisch, Dialekten und Regionalsprachen
(2008)
Starting from declarations of the EU, the value of European languages and their diversity according to their different territorial, social, and legal extensions are discussed. The Standard varieties of the various languages are emphasized as being especially important for national and European language policies and for individual language cultivation. They contributed and may continue to contribute more than other language varieties to the cultural wealth of Europe. On the other hand, their development is especially impaired by the increasing use of ‘global' English. The increasing tendency toward a diaglossia (English plus one other language) and the use of languages within the institutions of the EU are discussed. In conclusion, it is argued that although tolerance is necessary, it is not sufficient for a thriving further development of the European linguistic diversity.