Bilingualismus / Mehrsprachigkeit
Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (6)
- Article (2)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Language
- English (6)
- German (3)
- Latvian (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (11)
Keywords
- Sprachpolitik (11) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (6)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (5)
- Postprint (4)
- Ahead of Print (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (6)
- Peer-Review (5)
Publisher
- Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis (1)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (1)
- Lang (1)
- Multilingual Matters (1)
- Narr (1)
- Palgrave Macmillan (1)
- Rezekne Academy of Technologies (1)
- Sage (1)
- Steiner (1)
- Taylor & Francis (1)
Latvia
(2019)
This chapter deals with current issues in bilingual education in the framework of language and educational policies in Latvia, and also outlines similarities or common tendencies in the two other Baltic states, Estonia and Lithuania. As commonly understood in the 21st century, the term ‘bilingual education’ includes ‘multilingual education, as the umbrella term to cover a wide spectrum of practice and policy’ (García, 2009: 9).
Deutsch in Sprachkontakten
(2021)
Das vorliegende Heft vereint Beiträge zu Kontakten des Deutschen mit verschiedenen Sprachen nördlich, östlich und südlich des deutschsprachigen Kerngebietes. Sprachkontakt wird dabei aus unterschiedlichsten Perspektiven erfasst; die Aufsätze behandeln einzelne strukturelle Sprachebenen ebenso wie pragmalinguistische, historische, soziolinguistische und translatologische Themen. Die Ausgabe vereint damit Untersuchungen zu Sprachkontakten in der Vergangenheit (Saagpakk/Saar, Plaušinaitytė), zum Gebrauch in spezifischen Textsorten (Mencigar, Földes), bis hin zu Sprachgebrauchsphänomenen im Kontext von Covid-19 (Geyer). Andere Beiträge fokussieren auf die Entwicklung sprachlicher Kompetenzen in Abhängigkeit von Kontakteinflüssen (Tibaut, Ščukanec/Durbek) oder dem Einfluss der Medien (Mack/Vollstädt/Vujović) oder diskutieren das Zusammenwirken von Sprachpolitik und Sprachgebrauch (Marten). Das Heft schließt mit mehreren Rezensionen und Projektberichten ab; insgesamt wird damit ein wesentlicher Ausschnitt aus der Bandbreite der germanistischen Sprachkontaktforschung in der Region von Estland bis Montenegro aufgezeigt.
Aims and objectives:
Language debates in Latvia often focus on the role of Latvian as official and main societal language. Yet, Latvian society is highly multilingual, and families with home languages other than Latvian have to choose between different educational trajectories for their children. In this context, this paper discusses the results of two studies which addressed the question of why families with Russian as a home language choose (pre)schools with languages other than Russian as medium of instruction (MOI). The first study analyses family narratives which provide insight into attitudes and practices which lead to the decision to send children to Latvian-MOI institutions. The second study investigates language attitudes and practices by families in the international community of Riga German School.
Methodology:
The paper discusses data gathered during two studies: for the first, semi-structed interviews were conducted with Russian-speaking families who choose Latvian-medium schools for their children. For the second study, a survey was carried out in the community of an international school in Riga, sided by ethnographic observations and interviews with teachers and the school leadership.
Data and analysis:
Interviews and ethnographic observations were subjected to a discourse analysis with a focus on critical events and structures of life trajectory narratives. Survey data were processed following simple statistical analysis and qualitative content analysis.
Findings/conclusions:
Our data reveal that families highly embrace multilingualism and see the development of individual plurilingualism as important for integration into Latvian society as well as for educational and professional opportunities in the multilingual societies of Latvia and Europe. At the same time, multilingualism and multiculturalism, including Russian, are seen as a value in itself. In addition, our studies reflect the bidirectionality of family language policies in interplay with practices in educational institutions: family decisions influence children’s language acquisition at school, but the school also has an impact on the families’ language practices at home. In sum, we argue that educational policies should therefore pay justice to the wishes of families in Latvia to incorporate different language aspects into individual educational trajectories.
Originality:
Language policy is a frequent topic of investigation in the Baltic states. However, there has been a lack in research on family language policy and school choices. In this vein, our paper adds to the understanding of educational choices and language policy processes among Russian-speaking families and the international community in Latvia.
This paper discusses contemporary societal roles of German in the Baltic states (Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania). Speaker and learner statistics and a summary of sociolinguistic research (Linguistic Landscapes, language learning motivation, language policies, international roles of languages) suggest that German has by far fewer speakers and functions than the national languages, English, and Russian, and it is not a dominant language in the contemporary Baltics anymore. However, German is ahead of ‘any other language’ in terms of users and societal roles as a frequent language in education, of economic relations, as a historical lingua franca, and a language of traditional and new minorities. Highly diverse groups of users and language policy actors form a ‘coalition of interested parties’ which creates niches which guarantee German a frequent use. In the light of the abundance of its functions, the paper suggests the concept ‘additional language of society’ for a variety such as German in the Baltics – since there seems to be no adequate alternative labelling which would do justice to all societal roles. The paper argues that this concept may also be used for languages in similar societal situations and, not least, be useful in language marketing and the promotion of multilingualism.
2008. godā tyka veikts pietejums, kura golvonais mierkis beja raksturuot niulenejū latgalīšu volūdys lūmu izgleiteibys sistemā. Itys roksts prezeņtej byutiskuokūs pietejuma rezultatus. Pietejuma īrūsme sajimta nu „Mercator Education Centre“ (Merkatora izgleiteibys centra), kas dorbojās Nīderlaņdē Ļuvortā (frīzu volūdā — Ljouwert), Frīzejis proviņcis golvyspiļsātā. Piļneigs pietejuma izvārsums ar Merkatora izgleiteibys centra atbolstu publicāts izdavumu serejā „Regional Dossier Series“ (Regionalūs dosje sereja) angļu volūdā. Itys roksts golvonom kuortom dūmuots taidam adresatam, kas mozuok ir saisteits ar Eiropys volūdu izpietis institucejom i kam roksti angļu volūdā var saguoduot izpratnis voi atrasšonys gryuteibys. Partū pietejuma suokumā teik dūts seikuoks metožu i mierķu raksturuojums, paskaidrojūt pietejuma strukturu i rezultatu apkūpuojuma veidu, kai ari dūts puorskots par latgalīšu volūdys lūmu myusdīnu izgleiteibys sistemā. Sacynuojumūs ir īzeimātys nuokūtnis perspektivis i prīšklykumi dabuotūs rezultatu izmontuojumam.
“Linguistic Landscapes” (LL) is a research method which has become increasingly popular in recent years. In this paper, we will first explain the method itself and discuss some of its fundamental assumptions. We will then recall the basic traits of multilingualism in the Baltic States, before presenting results from our project carried out together with a group of Master students of Philology in several medium-sized towns in the Baltic States, focussing on our home town of Rēzekne in the highly multilingual region of Latgale in Eastern Latvia. In the discussion of some of the results, we will introduce the concept of “Legal Hypercorrection” as a term for the stricter compliance of language laws than necessary. The last part will report on advantages of LL for educational purposes of multilingualism, and for developing discussions on multilingualism among the general public.
This chapter introduces readers to the context and concept of this volume. It starts by providing an historical overview of languages and multilingualism in Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia, highlighting the 100th anniversary of statehood which the three Baltic states are celebrating in 2018. Then, the chapter briefly presents important strands of research on multilingualism in the region throughout the past decades; in particular, questions about language policies and the status of the national languages (Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian) and Russian. It also touches on debates about languages in education and the roles of other languages such as the regional languages of Latgalian and Võro and the changing roles of international languages such as English and German. The chapter concludes by providing short summaries of the contributions to this book.
I nationale og curopa’iskc sprogpolitiske undersogelser savner man orte et tilt'redsstiIlende cmpirisk grundlag. De tilgsngelige data om den aktuelle Situation for sprogene i de forskelligc lande er heterogene. ufuldstEndige og delvist foraddede og derfor vanskelige at sammenligne over tid. EKNIL’s curoptciskc sprogbarometer. KLM, er et forsog pä al afhjxlpe denne Situation. KLM er baseret pä et omfattende spor- geskema om en bred vifte al’sproglige forhold som er egnet til at danne et billede at'sprogenes Status og sprogpolitiske praksisser i hvert enkelt land. fx sprogencs juridiske Status, sprogenes Status i undervis- ning og forskning, Situationen for minoritetssprog, sprogene i kulturen og i erhvervslivet. KLM gennem- tores med fä ärs mellemrum. Naervjerende artikel beskriver baggrunden og resultateme af KLM 2 (2007- 2011) som omfatler 23 europa’iske lande
Grußwort
(2002)