Sprache, Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (3108)
- Article (1767)
- Book (418)
- Conference Proceeding (319)
- Part of Periodical (177)
- Review (135)
- Other (77)
- Working Paper (44)
- Report (14)
- Contribution to a Periodical (7)
Language
- German (5269)
- English (761)
- French (13)
- Russian (13)
- Multiple languages (12)
- Portuguese (6)
- Spanish (4)
- Polish (3)
- Bulgarian (1)
- Croatian (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (3734)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (552)
- Wörterbuch (313)
- Konversationsanalyse (262)
- Gesprochene Sprache (251)
- Sprachgeschichte (251)
- Grammatik (249)
- Rezension (248)
- Sprachgebrauch (239)
- Kommunikation (194)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (2360)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (890)
- Postprint (191)
- Ahead of Print (8)
- Preprint (8)
- Erstveröffentlichung (4)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (3)
- Verlags-Lektorat (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2329)
- Peer-Review (824)
- Verlags-Lektorat (67)
- Peer-review (34)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (9)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (8)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (7)
- (Verlags-)lektorat (4)
- Peer-reviewed (4)
- Verlagslektorat (4)
In English, past tense stative clauses embedded under a past-marked attitude verb, like Eric thought that Kalina was sick, can receive two interpretations, differing on when the state of the complement is understood to hold, i.e. Kalina’s sickness precedes the time of Eric’s thinking (backward-shifted reading), or Kalina is sick at the time of Eric’s thinking (simultaneous reading). As is well known, the availability of the simultaneous reading—also called Sequence of tense (SOT)—is subject to cross-linguistic variation. Non-SOT languages only allow for the backward-shifted interpretation. This cross-linguistic variation has been analysed in two main ways in the literature: a structural approach, connecting the availability of the simultaneous reading in a language to a syntactic mechanism that allows the embedded past not to be interpreted; and an implicature approach, which links the absence of such a reading to the presence of a “cessation” implicature associated with past tense. We report a series of experiments on Polish, which is commonly classified as a non-SOT language. First, we investigate the interpretation of complement clauses embedded under past-marked attitude verbs in Polish and English. This investigation revealed a difference between these two languages in the availability of simultaneous interpretations for past-under-past complement clauses, albeit not as large as a binary distinction between SOT and non-SOT languages would lead us to expect. We then address the question of whether the lower acceptability we observe for simultaneous readings in Polish might be due to an embedded cessation implicature. On the way to address this question, we show that in simple matrix clauses, Polish gives rise to the same cessation inference as English. Then we investigate Polish past-under-past sentences in positive and negative contexts, comparing their potential cessation implicature to the exclusive implicature of disjunction. In our results, we found that the latter was endorsed more often in positive than in negative contexts, as expected, while the cessation implicature was endorsed overall very little, with no difference across contexts. The disanalogy between the disjunction and the temporal cases, and the insensitivity of the latter to monotonicity, are a challenge for the implicature approach, and cast doubts on associating SOT phenomena with implicatures.
In Fachsprache 1–2/2011 Czicza and Hennig proposed a model that explains correlations between grammatical features and pragmatic conditions in communication in sciences. This model now serves as a basis for the practical analysis of the scientific degree of any written text. The authors present a method of analyzing written texts concerning the four parameters ‚economy’‚ precision’, ‚impersonalization’ and ‚discussion’. The method is being developed by the analysis of a prototypical scientific article on the one hand and a non-scientific text on the other hand. The two texts serve as the two poles of the scale of scientificity. Finally, the applicability of the model and its operationalization is being illustrated by the analysis of two examples of texts that are located between the two poles (one popular scientific text and one juridical teaching article).
Within a rapidly digitalising society, it is important to understand how the learning and teaching of digital skills play out in situ, particularly amongst older adults who acquire these skills later in life. This paper focuses on participants engaged in the process of learning digital skills in adult education courses. Using video recordings from adult education centres in Finland and Germany, we explore how students mobilise their teachers’ assistance when encountering problems with their smartphones, laptops or tablets. Prior research on social interaction has shown that assistance can be recruited through a variety of verbal and embodied formats. In this specific educational setting, participants can use complaints about their digital skills or mobile devices to obtain assistance. Utilising multimodal conversation analysis, we describe two basic sequence types involving students’ complaints, discuss their cross-linguistic characteristics, and reflect on their connection to this educational setting and digital devices.
In theater as a bodily-spatial art form, much emphasis is placed on the way actors perform movements in space as an important multimodal resource for creating meaning. In theater rehearsals, movements are created in series of directors' instructions and actors' implementations. Directors' instructions on how to conduct a movement often draw on embodied demonstrations in contrast to verbal descriptions. For instance, to instruct an actress to act like a school girl a director can use depictive (he demonstrates the expected behavior) instead of descriptive (“can you act like a school girl”) means. Drawing on a corpus of 400 h video recordings of rehearsal interactions in three German professional theater productions, from which we selected 265 cases, we examine ways to instruct movement-based actions in theater rehearsals. Using a multimodally extended ethnomethodological-conversation analytical approach, we focus on the multimodal details that constitute demonstrations as complex action types. For the present article, we have chosen nine instances, through which we aim to illuminate (1) The difference in using embodied demonstrations versus verbal descriptions to instruct; (2) typical ways directors combine verbal descriptions with embodied demonstrations in their instructions. First, we ask what constitutes a demonstration and what it achieves in comparison to verbal descriptions. Using a typical case, we illustrate four characteristics of demonstrations that all of the cases we studied share. Demonstrations (1) are embedded in instructional activities; (2) show and do not tell; (3) are responded to by emulating what was shown; (4) are rhetorically shaped to convey the instruction's focus. However, none of the 265 demonstrations we investigated were produced without verbal descriptions. In a second step we therefore ask in which typical ways verbal descriptions accompany embodied demonstrations when directors instruct actors how to play a scene. We distinguish four basic types. Verbal descriptions can be used (1) to build the demonstration itself; (2) to delineate a demonstration verbally within an instruction; (3) to indicate positive (what should be done) and negative (what should be avoided) versions of demonstrations; (4) as an independent means to describe the instruction's focus in addition to the demonstration. Our study contributes to research on how embodied resources are used to create meaning and how they combine with and depend on verbal resources.
The QUEST (QUality ESTablished) project aims at ensuring the reusability of audio-visual datasets (Wamprechtshammer et al., 2022) by devising quality criteria and curating processes. RefCo (Reference Corpora) is an initiative within QUEST in collaboration with DoReCo (Documentation Reference Corpus, Paschen et al. (2020)) focusing on language documentation projects. Previously, Aznar and Seifart (2020) introduced a set of quality criteria dedicated to documenting fieldwork corpora. Based on these criteria, we establish a semi-automatic review process for existing and work-in-progress corpora, in particular for language documentation. The goal is to improve the quality of a corpus by increasing its reusability. A central part of this process is a template for machine-readable corpus documentation and automatic data verification based on this documentation. In addition to the documentation and automatic verification, the process involves a human review and potentially results in a RefCo certification of the corpus. For each of these steps, we provide guidelines and manuals. We describe the evaluation process in detail, highlight the current limits for automatic evaluation and how the manual review is organized accordingly.
Metadata provides important information relevant both to finding and understanding corpus data. Meaningful linguistic data requires both reasonable annotations and documentation of these annotations. This documentation is part of the metadata of a dataset. While corpus documentation has often been provided in the form of accompanying publications, machinereadable metadata, both containing the bibliographic information and documenting the corpus data, has many advantages. Metadata standards allow for the development of common tools and interfaces. In this paper I want to add a new perspective from an archive’s point of view and look at the metadata provided for four learner corpora and discuss the suitability of established standards for machine-readable metadata. I am are aware that there is ongoing work towards metadata standards for learner corpora. However, I would like to keep the discussion going and add another point of view: increasing findability and reusability of learner corpora in an archiving context.
Im Fokus dieses Beitrags steht ein Format, das die Eigenschaften der im Titel dieses Buches so genannten hypermedialen multimodalen Kommunikation in sich vereint: Let's Plays. Den Titel des Beitrags aufnehmend, könnte man hier auch von „vielen Fliegen“ und „einer Klappe“ sprechen, denn Let's Plays bieten eine ganze Reihe von Anknüpfungspunkten, die für den Deutschunterricht relevant sind, aber eben auch - und das ist so charakteristisch für den Einsatz digitaler Formate im Unterricht - anschlussfähig sind für andere Fächer und damit auch den Weg aufzeigen, in eine Schule 3.0, die sich aus starren Fächerkorsetten zu befreien sucht und die Gegebenheiten einer digitalisierten Lebens- und Arbeitswelt etwa in inter- und transdisziplinären Modulen und Projekten abbildet und berücksichtigt.
Insofern reichen auch die Möglichkeiten, Let's Plays in den Deutschunterricht einzubinden, die wir in diesem Beitrag aufzeigen werden, über das Fach Deutsch hinaus und sind dennoch mit Blick auf die Bildungsstandards in der Grundschule und in weiterführenden Schulen passfähig. Sie berühren die Haupt-Kompetenzbereiche: Sprechen und Zuhören, Schreiben, Lesen - Mit Texten und Medien umgehen und Sprache und Sprachgebrauch untersuchen. Diese in den Rahmenlehrplänen vorhandene analytische Trennung spiegelt sich im konkreten Material „Let's Play“ nicht wider. Wir werden deshalb auf einzelne Aspekte eingehen, die als Anregung für die Integration des Gegenstandes in den Deutschunterricht verstanden werden können.