Sprache im 20. Jahrhundert. Gegenwartssprache
Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (48) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (24)
- Article (12)
- Part of Periodical (8)
- Book (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Review (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (48)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (48)
Keywords
- Deutsch (48) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (29)
- de Gruyter (4)
- Dudenverlag (1)
- Hempen (1)
- Lang (1)
- Narr (1)
- Stauffenburg (1)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (1)
- Waxmann (1)
In meiner 2010 erschienenen Dissertation „Migration, Sprache und Rassismus“ habe ich mit ethnografischen, gesprächsanalytischen und -rhetorischen Methoden den Kommunikationsstil von zwei akademischen Migrantenmilieus(„emanzipatorische Migranten“ und „akademische Europatürken“) in Deutschland untersucht. Die Studie war Teil des Projekts „Deutschtürkische Sprachvariation und die Herausbildung kommunikativer Stile in dominant türkischen Migrantengruppen“, das am Institut für Deutsche Sprache durchgeführt wurde.
Conversation Analysis (CA) and Discursive Psychology (DP) reject the view that assumptions
about cognitive processes should be used to account for discursive phenomena. Instead, cognitive
issues are respecified as discursive phenomena. Discursive psychologists do this by
studying discursive practices of talking about mental phenomena and using mental predicates.
This approach is exemplified by a study of the use of constructions with German verstehen
(‘to understand’) in conversation. Some conversation analysts take another approach,
namely, inquiring into how participants display mental states in talk-in-interaction. This is
exemplified by a study of how grammatical constructions are used to display different types
of inferences drawn from a partner’s prior turn. It will be argued that the constructivist, antiessentialist
stance which CA and DP take with regard to cognition is a prosperous line of
research, which has much in its favor from a methodological point of view. However, it
can be shown that tacit assumptions about cognitive processes are still inevitable when
doing CA and DP. As a conclusion, the paper pleads for an enhanced awareness of how cognitive
processes come into play when analysing talk-in-interaction and it advocates the integration
of a more explicit cognitive perspective into research on talk-in-interaction.
Although most of the relevant dictionary productions of the recent past have relied on digital data and methods, there is little consensus on formats and standards. The Institute for Corpus Linguistics and Text Technology (ICLTT) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences has been conducting a number of varied lexicographic projects, both digitising print dictionaries and working on the creation of genuinely digital lexicographic data. This data was designed to serve varying purposes: machine-readability was only one. A second goal was interoperability with digital NLP tools. To achieve this end, a uniform encoding system applicable across all the projects was developed. The paper describes the constraints imposed on the content models of the various elements of the TEI dictionary module and provides arguments in favour of TEI P5 as an encoding system not only being used to represent digitised print dictionaries but also for NLP purposes.
This paper describes work in progress on I5, a TEI-based document grammar for the corpus holdings of the Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) in Mannheim and the text model used by IDS in its work. The paper begins with background information on the nature and purposes of the corpora collected at IDS and the motivation for the I5 project (section 1). It continues with a description of the origin and history of the IDS text model (section 2), and a description (section 3) of the techniques used to automate, as far as possible, the preparation of the ODD file documenting the IDS text model. It ends with some concluding remarks (section 4). A survey of the additional features of the IDS-XCES realization of the IDS text model is given in an appendix.
Die jährlich im Vorfeld der DGfS-Tagung veranstaltete Arbeitstagung Linguistische Pragmatik fand 2012 vor besonderem Hintergrund statt: Es war zugleich die erste Jahrestagung des neu gegründeten, seit 01.01.2012 bestehenden Vereins Arbeitskreis Linguistische Pragmatik. Zu diesem Anlass haben die Organisatoren (Constanze Spieß, Elke Diedrichsen und Jörg Bücker) ein Rahmenthema gewählt, das pragmatisch orientierte Linguistinnen und Linguisten der verschiedensten Forschungsrichtungen zusammenbringt: Sprachkritik und Sprachwandel.