Sprache im 20. Jahrhundert. Gegenwartssprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (928) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (928)
Keywords
- Deutsch (679)
- Konversationsanalyse (60)
- Kommunikation (56)
- Sprachgebrauch (52)
- Massenmedien (43)
- Sprachwandel (36)
- Semantik (35)
- Gesprochene Sprache (34)
- Wortschatz (34)
- Mediensprache (33)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (276)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (48)
- Postprint (18)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (332)
- Peer-Review (7)
- Verlags-Lektorat (3)
Publisher
- Schwann (325)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (105)
- de Gruyter (76)
- Narr (70)
- Lang (46)
- Niemeyer (31)
- Dudenverlag (18)
- Westdeutscher Verlag (18)
- V&R unipress (15)
- Stauffenburg (12)
Konstanten und die Wandlung der Verhältnisse : Methodisches und Historisches zur Kontaktlinguistik
(1992)
O tempora, (o modi)! Synthetische und analytische Tempusformen in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache
(1995)
Einleitung
(1986)
Versuchte Nähe : über die Sensibilität der Methoden und die Schwierigkeiten der Interpretation
(1985)
Einleitung
(2008)
Europe is a continent of many languages. We all know that, but normally when we think about this fact, we focus on national languages, the type of language that shapes our political and our linguistic geography. But as natural as it may seem today, the idea of a language closely being interrelated with one's identity does not have a very long tradition. In fact it is only since the late 18th century that we think there is some type of intimate connection between the language spoken and the identity of a person as belonging to a nation. And even if the stabilization of European nation states was closely connected with this type of reasoning, European language communities differ considerably in their way of dealing with natural variation within their national language. For some of them, it is only the standardized national language that is relevant in this respect; for others, a certain amount of variation is a central part of their linguistic identity.
The paper (1) starts from the general understanding of children’s development gained by interdisciplinary endeavours during the last decades, (2) characterises the functional-pragmatic conception of language and language acquisition as opposed to conceptions of language as an isolated system and of language acquisition as an independent module of development, (3) describes forms of language acquisition and language mediation.
In her overview, Margret Selting makes the case for the claim that dealing with authentic conversation necessarily lies at the heart of an interactionallinguistic approach to prosody (see Selting this volume, Section 3.3). However, collecting and transcribing corpora of authentic interaction is a time-consuming enterprise. This fact often severely restricts what the individual researcher is able to do in terms of analysis within the scope of his or her resources. Still, for dealing with many of the desiderata Margret Selting points out in Section 5 of her extensive overview, the use of larger corpora seems to be required. In this commenting paper, I want to argue that future progress in research on prosody in interaction will essentially rest on the availability and use of large public corpora. After reviewing arguments for and against the use of public corpora, I will discuss some upshots regarding corpus design and issues of transcription of public corpora.
Playing with the voice of the other : stylized kanaksprak in conversations among German adolescents
(2007)
Verstehen im Gespräch
(2008)
Die Hermeneutik und die empirisch-psychologische Textrezeptionsforschung haben sich
damit befasst, wie Leser Texten Sinn zuschreiben. Sozialphilosophen (wie Weber, Schütz,
Mead, Habermas) sehen in Prozessen der symbolvermittelten Verständigung das alltagsweltliche
Fundament der sozialen Welt und der Möglichkeit gesellschaftlicher Integration.
Wie aber verhalten sich diese, aus der Textanalyse und der zeichen-und sozialtheoretischen
Reflexion entstandenen Konzeptionen des Verstehens zum alltagsweltlichen Verstehen im
Gespräch? Ist hier eigentlich vorn gleichen Vorgang die Rede? Sind mentalistische, noemalive
und leserbezogene Konzepte des Verstehens brauchbar für die Analyse beobachtbarer
Prozesse der Herstellung von Intersubjektivität in Gesprächen?
Dieser Aufsatz umreißt zunächst kurz den wissenschaftlichen Diskussionskontext, innerhalb
dessen Verstehen zum Gegenstand geworden ist (1). Kontrastiv dazu werden die
Prämissen einer Untersuchung von Verstehen in Gesprächen bestimmt, die sich aus den
spezifischen Situationsparametern mündlicher Interaktion ergeben (2). Den Hauptleil der
Abhandlung bildet der Aufweis der elementaren sequenziellen Organisationsform und
typischer sprachlicher Manifeslationen der Dokumentation und der Verhandlung von Verstehen
im Gespräch {3). Abschließend werden einige allgemeine Eigenschaften resümiert,
die die Dokumentation von Verstehen in Gesprächen auszuzeichnen scheinen (4).
"damit sie mich verstehen" : Genese, Verfahren und recipient design einer narrativen Performance
(2009)
One major issue in the accomplishment of contrasts in conversation is lexical choice of items which carry the semantic Ioad of the two states of affair which are represented as being opposed to one another. These items or expressions are co-selected to be understood as being contrastively related to each other. In this paper, it is argued that the activity of contrasting itself provides them with a specific local opposite meaning which they would not obtain in other contexts. Practices of contrastingare thus seen as an example of conversational activities which creatively and systematically affect situated meanings. Basedon data from various genres, such as meetings, mediation sessions and conversations, the paper discusses two practices of contrasting, their sequential construction and their interpretative effects. It is concluded that the interpretative effects of conversational contrasting rest on the sequential deployment oflinguistic resources and on the cognitive procedures of frame-based interpretation and constructing a maximally contrastive interpretation for the co-selected expressions.