Sprache im 20. Jahrhundert. Gegenwartssprache
Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (66) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (38)
- Article (15)
- Part of Periodical (6)
- Book (4)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Preprint (1)
- Review (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (66)
Keywords
- Deutsch (56)
- Massenmedien (14)
- Mediensprache (14)
- Russisch (8)
- Englisch (6)
- Russland (6)
- Kolloquium (5)
- Neuerscheinungen (5)
- Newsletter (5)
- Projekte (5)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (7)
- Postprint (4)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (3)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (7)
- Peer-Review (5)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (34)
- de Gruyter (6)
- Benjamins (3)
- Elsevier (2)
- Lang (2)
- Schmidt (2)
- Stauffenburg (2)
- Verlag der Universität Wolgograd (2)
- Association of Internet Researchers (1)
- De Gruyter (1)
Die vorliegende Arbeit behandelt zwei Konzessivkonnektoren des Deutschen: "obwohl" und "trotzdem". Einleitend wird kurz auf ihre Etymologie eingegangen. Den Hauptteil der Arbeit bildet die Untersuchung ihrer syntaktischen und semantischen Eigenschaften auf der Basis einer Sammlung von Originalbelegen. Untersucht wird, in welche Wortklassen "obwohl" und "trotzdem" einzuordnen sind. Dabei wird neben ihrem syntaktischen Verhalten auch ihre Semantik, insbesondere die Verteilung thematischer Rollen, berücksichtigt. Es wird die These vertreten, dass "obwohl" in erster Linie ein Subjunktor ist, der aber auch als Adverb gebraucht werden kann, während "trotzdem" in erster Linie ein Adverb ist, das auch als Subjunktor verwendet werden kann.
The paper studies how the German connectives "also" and "dann" are used as displays of understanding in talk-in-interaction. It is shown that the use of also at turn-beginnings in pre-front-field position is a routine practice to explicate implicit meanings of the prior turn of the partner, which is presented for confirmation. Also thus indexes that explicated meanings are taken to be intersubjective, i.e. part of the interlocutors’ common ground. Turn-initial dann(in front-field position), in contrast, is routinely used to (a) index the formulation of a unilateral inference from the partner’s prior turn which is not claimed to have already been communicated by the partner, and is (b) used to preface different kinds of next actions which are framed as being a consequence from the preceding action of the partner. Drawing on data from four genres of talkin- interaction (conversation, psychotherapy, doctor-patient interaction, broadcasted talk shows), the paper discusses how functions of also and dann are related to their positions concerning turn-construction and topological fields, prosodic design, collocations, sequential structures and participation frameworks of the interaction.
Based on German speaking data from various activity types, the range of multimodal resources used to construct turn-beginnings is reviewed. It is claimed that participants in talk-in-interaction need to deal with four tasks in order to construct a turn which precisely fits the interactional moment of its production:
1. Achieve joint orientation: The accomplishment of the socio-spatial prerequisites necessary for producing a turn which is to become part of the participants’ common ground.
2. Display uptake: Next speaker needs to display his/her understanding of the interaction so far as the backdrop on which the production of the upcoming turn is based.
3. Deal with projections from prior talk: The speaker has to deal with projections which have been established by (the) previous turn(s) with respect to the upcoming turn.
4. Project properties of turn-in-progress: The speaker needs to orient the recipient to properties of the turn s/he is about to produce.
Turn-design thus can be seen to be informed by tasks related to the multimodal, embodied, and interactive contingencies of online-construction of turns. The four tasks are ordered in terms of prior tasks providing the prerequisite for accomplishing a later task.
Thoughts on what kind of dictionaries and why they are necessary for journalists lead to the conclusion: first of all, dictionaries of pronunciation are interesting for them. Radio and television journalists need pronouncing dictionaries. In this regard, there are such modern dictionaries as “The Dictionary of Russian Pronunciation Difficulties” (Kalenchuk/Kasatkina 2006), “The Dictionary of Emphasis for Radio and TV announcers” (Vvedenskaja 2004) and “The Dictionary of Perfect Russian Emphasis” (Shtudiner 2007). Dictionary reference books that help to avoid some spelling mistakes are necessary in the newspaper practice. This type of publication includes “The Abridged Dictionary of Russian Language Difficulties for the Workers of the Press” (1968) that contains about 400 words, and reference books such as: “Word Usage Difficulties in TV and Broadcasting” (Gajmakova/Menkevich 1998) and “Russian Language Difficulties” by Rakhmanova (ed.) (1994).
The term ‘marketing communications’ is used to denote communications by means of various persuasive messages about products, organizations, candidates and ideas that marketers send to audiences to build up knowledge of the mentioned objects, to evoke positive attitudes towards them, to stimulate the audience to act in a certain way (buy, use, vote, approve) and remain loyal to them. Possibly the most dominant type of marketing communications in our culture is advertising, but there are many other effective forms of marketing persuasion (public relations, sponsorship, point-of-sale communications, sales promotion, event marketing, product placement, etc.). Advertising uses mass media channels (traditional and new media) to contact and interact with the audiences, and thus the language of advertising has become a special form of mass media language.
Discourse analysis in general, and media discourse analysis in particular, are currently attracting increased attention from linguists. This interest can be seen in the tendency to apply the term ‘discourse’ to various sciences and academic disciplines. It is possible to trace its dispersion both horizontally, i.e. in different sciences, and vertically, i.e. on various linguistic levels. Furthermore, the majority of interpretations of the term ‘discourse’ appearing in the works of modern scholars have arisen as a result of the interdisciplinary nature of language study within the cognitive paradigm in linguistics.
Tendenzen der Verwendung von Fremdwörtern in der Pressesprache im deutsch-litauischen Vergleich
(2013)
Globalisierung, offene Grenzen, intensive Integrationsprozesse eröffnen neue Kommunikationsmöglichkeiten, aktualisieren Kultur- und Sprachkontakte. Die intensiven Beziehungen auf allen Gebieten führen zu wechselseitiger Beeinflussung in der Kommunikation und im Sprachsystem. Sowohl Litauisch als auch Deutsch werden in der heutigen mehrsprachigen und multikulturellen Welt von vielen anderen Sprachen beeinflusst und durch die Tendenzen der Internationalisierung charakterisiert. In der litauischen Standardsprache ist besonders aktiver Gebrauch von Fremdwörtern festzustellen, die in der heutigen Entwicklungsphase vor allem aus dem Englischen übernommen werden. Die Pressesprache reagiert am schnellsten auf diesen Prozess, der auch in anderen Sprachdiskursen vor sich geht, und zeigt am deutlichsten seine Tendenzen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden einige Verwendungstendenzen von Fremdwörtern in der litauischen Pressesprache betrachtet und unter interkulturellem Aspekt mit der Verwendung von Fremdwörtern in der deutschen Pressesprache verglichen. Die litauischen Belege wurden meistens aus Zeitungen und Zeitschriften entnommen, einige Beispiele stammen aus anderen Quellen, aus Anzeigen, Faltblättern, Werbetexten, sie sind mit „rš“ markiert. Als Quelle für Beispielsätze aus der deutschen Presse wurden teilweise die Korpora der geschriebenen Sprache des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim (www.ids-mannheim.de) und der Wortschatz-Datenbank „Wortschatzlexikon“ der Universität Leipzig (http://wortschatz.uni-leipzig.de) benutzt. Beispielsätze werden manchmal verkürzt angeführt. Folgende Wörterbücher wurden verwendet: Duden – Deutsches Universalwörterbuch (1996); Duden – Das Fremdwörterbuch (1966, 1974, 1982, 1990); Duden – Das große Fremdwörterbuch (2000).