Sprache im 20. Jahrhundert. Gegenwartssprache
Refine
Year of publication
- 2002 (5) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Article (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Language
- English (5) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (5)
Keywords
- Hypertext (2)
- Argumentation (1)
- Aspekt (1)
- Deutsch (1)
- Digital Humanities (1)
- Gesprochene Sprache (1)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (1)
- Topic map (1)
- Verb (1)
- XML (1)
Publicationstate
- Postprint (3)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (3)
Publisher
In the context of the HyTex project, our goal is to convert a corpus into a hypertext, basing conversion strategies on annotations which explicitly mark up the text-grammatical structures and relations between text segments. Domain-specific knowledge is represented in the form of a knowledge net, using topic maps. We use XML as an interchange format. In this paper, we focus on a declarative rule language designed to express conversion strategies in terms of text-grammatical structures and hypertext results. The strategies can be formulated in a concise formal syntax which is independend of the markup, and which can be transformed automatically into executable program code.
This paper is about the meaning of the progressive aspect, which has been notoriously difficult to give a satisfying account of. A number of intriguing properties of its meaning were first brought out in formal semantic treatments. An event semantics approach to the progressive which integrates concepts of normality and perspective as well as adequate lexical representations seems to be particularly promising. In section 2 I will present several problems connected with the semantics of the progressive that are crucial for shaping its truth conditions. Several solutions to these problems that have been suggested in the literature will be discussed. In section 3 I will sketch a preliminary account of the meaning of the progressive aspect. In section 3.1 the basic components that underlie the truth conditions of the progressive will be described. In section 3.2 I will present underlying lexical assumptions and the truth conditions for the progressive. Finally, in section 4, I will evaluate the proposal by revisiting the problems discussed.