nein
Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (117) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (73)
- Article (24)
- Book (18)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (36)
- Gesprochene Sprache (12)
- Wörterbuch (11)
- Kommunikation (10)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (9)
- Interaktion (9)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (9)
- Syntax (9)
- Jugendsprache (8)
- Konversationsanalyse (8)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (16)
- Postprint (4)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (19)
- Peer-Review (17)
- Peer-Revied (4)
- Peer-review (1)
Publisher
- Winter (17)
- De Gruyter (13)
- de Gruyter (11)
- Retorika (8)
- Linssen Druckcenter (6)
- Narr Francke Attempto (4)
- Oxford University Press (4)
- Elsevier (3)
- Frank & Timme (3)
- Lang (3)
In their analysis of methods that participants use to manage the realization of practical courses of action, Kendrick and Drew (2016/this issue) focus on cases of assistance, where the need to be addressed is Self’s, and Other lends a helping hand. In our commentary, we point to other forms of cooperative engagement that are ubiquitously recruited in interaction. Imperative requests characteristically expect compliance on the grounds of Other’s already established commitment to a wider and shared course of actions. Established commitments can also provide the engine behind recruitment sequences that proceed nonverbally. And forms of cooperative engagement that are well glossed as assistance can nevertheless be demonstrably oriented to established commitments. In sum, we find commitment to shared courses of action to be an important element in the design and progression of certain recruitment sequences, where the involvement of Other is best defined as contribution. The commentary highlights the importance of interdependent orientations in the organization of cooperation. Data are in German, Italian, and Polish.
This book analyses requests for action on the basis of natural video-recorded data of everyday interaction in British English and Polish families. Jorg Zinken describes in his analyses the features of interactional context that people across cultures might be sensitive to in designing a request, as well as aspects of cultural diversity.
We present an empirical study addressing the question whether, and to which extent, lexicographic writing aids improve text revision results. German university students were asked to optimise two German texts using (1) no aids at all, (2) highlighted problems, or (3) highlighted problems accompanied by lexicographic resources that could be used to solve the specific problems. We found that participants from the third group corrected the largest number of problems and introduced the fewest semantic distortions during revision. Also, they reached the highest overall score and were most efficient (as measured in points per time). The second group with highlighted problems lies between the two other groups in almost every measure we analysed. We discuss these findings in the scope of intelligent writing environments, the effectiveness of writing aids in practical usage situations and teaching dictionary skills.
Sprachkritik
(2016)
The present study uses electromagnetic articulography, by which the position of tongue and lips during speech is measured, for the study of dialect variation. By using generalized additive modeling to analyze the articulatory trajectories, we are able to reliably detect aggregate group differences, while simultaneously taking into account the individual variation of dozens of speakers. Our results show that two Dutch dialects show clear differences in their articulatory settings, with generally a more anterior tongue position in the dialect from Ubbergen in the southern half of the Netherlands than in the dialect of Ter Apel in the northern half of the Netherlands. A comparison with formant-based acoustic measurements further reveals that articulography is able to reveal interesting structural articulatory differences between dialects which are not visible when only focusing on the acoustic signal.