nein
Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Part of a Book (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Akzent (1)
- Asian Americans (1)
- Data mining (1)
- Directive 95/46/EC (1)
- Dominanz (1)
- Google Translate (1)
- Latin Americans (1)
- Machine Translation (1)
- Maschinelle Übersetzung (1)
- Müntzer, Thomas (1)
Publicationstate
- Postprint (4) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2)
- Peer-Review (2)
Publisher
Objective: Discrimination against nonnative speakers is widespread and largely socially acceptable. Nonnative speakers are evaluated negatively because accent is a sign that they belong to an outgroup and because understanding their speech requires unusual effort from listeners. The present research investigated intergroup bias, based on stronger support for hierarchical relations between groups (social dominance orientation [SDO]), as a predictor of hiring recommendations of nonnative speakers.
Method: In an online experiment using an adaptation of the thin-slices methodology, 65 U.S. adults (54% women; 80% White; M[age] = 35.91, range = 18–67) heard a recording of a job applicant speaking with an Asian (Mandarin Chinese) or a Latino (Spanish) accent. Participants indicated how likely they would be to recommend hiring the speaker, answered questions about the text, and indicated how difficult it was to understand the applicant.
Results: Independent of objective comprehension, participants high in SDO reported that it was more difficult to understand a Latino speaker than an Asian speaker. SDO predicted hiring recommendations of the speakers, but this relationship was mediated by the perception that nonnative speakers were difficult to understand. This effect was stronger for speakers from lower status groups (Latinos relative to Asians) and was not related to objective comprehension.
Conclusions: These findings suggest a cycle of prejudice toward nonnative speakers: Not only do perceptions of difficulty in understanding cause prejudice toward them, but also prejudice toward low-status groups can lead to perceived difficulty in understanding members of these groups.
Thomas Müntzer zählt zu den Persönlichkeiten der deutschen Geschichte, die bislang völlig kontrovers beurteilt wurden. Das demonstriert schon die Auflistung der Bezeichnungen, mit denen Müntzer in der Literatur charakterisiert wurde und wird: Reformator, Theologe, Priester, Prediger, Prophet, Mystiker, Spiritualist, Apokalyptiker, (Sozial-)Revolutionär, Rebell, Bauernführer, Terrorist. In der DDR wurde er als Kämpfer für eine bessere, gerechte, von Ausbeutung freie Gesellschaft verehrt. Er galt als Vertreter eines christlichen Sozialismus. Sein Porträt war seit 1971 auf der 5-Mark- Banknote zu finden. Die religiösen Aspekte seines Wirkens wurden allerdings stark vernachlässigt. Die frühere Bundesrepublik sah in Müntzer eher einen religiösen Sonderling und nahm ihn nur am Rande zur Kenntnis.
Seine theologischen Auffassungen äußerte Müntzer in wenigen, meist recht kurzen, aber äußerst eindringlich formulierten Texten, deren Druck oft mit Problemen verbunden war. Bei den Zeitgenossen wirkte er vor allem über seine Predigten, die allerdings nicht publiziert wurden. Erhalten blieb dagegen ein nicht unbeträchtlicher Teil seines Briefwechsels, der für die Entwicklung seiner Ideen aufschlussreich ist. Im Prager Manifest, einem ungedruckt gebliebenen frühen Text, formulierte Müntzer erstmals in groben Zügen seine zentralen reformatorischen Vorstellungen.
The English language has taken advantage of the Digital Revolution to establish itself as the global language; however, only 28.6 %of Internet users speak English as their native language. Machine Trans-lation (MT) is a powerful technology that can bridge this gap. In devel-opment since the mid-20th century, MT has become available to every Internet user in the last decade, due to free online MT services. This paper aims to discuss the implications that these tools may have for the privacy of their users and how they are addressed by EU data protec-tion law. It examines the data-flows in respect of the initial processing (both from the perspective of the user and the MT service provider) and potential further processing that may be undertaken by the MT service provider.