Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (3434)
- Article (2304)
- Book (738)
- Conference Proceeding (512)
- Part of Periodical (283)
- Review (232)
- Doctoral Thesis (65)
- Working Paper (49)
- Other (47)
- Report (21)
Language
- German (6414)
- English (1078)
- Russian (142)
- French (30)
- Portuguese (14)
- Spanish (12)
- Multiple languages (11)
- Italian (8)
- Polish (5)
- Ukrainian (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7727) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (4226)
- Wörterbuch (497)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (479)
- Rezension (383)
- Rechtschreibung (333)
- Konversationsanalyse (314)
- Sprachgeschichte (295)
- Grammatik (274)
- Syntax (257)
- Semantik (236)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (2773)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (939)
- Postprint (222)
- Preprint (7)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (4)
- Erstveröffentlichung (4)
- Hybrides Open Access (2)
- Ahead of Print (1)
- Verlags-Lektorat (1)
- Verlagsveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2781)
- Peer-Review (894)
- Verlags-Lektorat (60)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (36)
- Peer-review (30)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (11)
- Abschlussarbeit (Bachelor, Master, Diplom, Magister) (Bachelor, Master, Diss.) (9)
- Peer-Revied (7)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (4)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (4)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (928)
- de Gruyter (913)
- Schwann (638)
- Narr (446)
- Niemeyer (199)
- Lang (160)
- De Gruyter (130)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (128)
- Narr Francke Attempto (89)
- IDS-Verlag (73)
Einleitung
(2008)
Introduction
(2005)
Einleitung
(2012)
The presentation and description of paradigmatic sense relations in German dictionaries is often limited to types such as synonymy and antonymy. Their information is neither well presented nor helpful for users. Although corpora offer fundamental methodological advantages, various corpus-guided approaches have not played an important role in extracting and describing paradigmatic relations in German lexicography so far. elexiko is a hypertext dictionary that explores a corpus to extract language data for the description of paradigmatic lexical relations. 1 will show how sense relations can be extracted systematically by employing both a corpus-driven and a complementary corpus-based approach. I will demonstrate how corpus data validates or challenges information in existing dictionaries and that in some cases lexicographic categories are not appropriate to capture specific linguistic phenomena with respect to sense-related items. Subsequently, an alternative method of extracting, describing, and presenting sense relations will be presented.
In this brief presentation of Conversation Analysis (“CA”), we take up some of the communication problems associated with hearing loss and link them to conversation analytic concepts. We explain how attempts to control the conversation, embarrassment and miscommunication can be analyzed as interactional achievements in the areas of turn-taking, repair and nonverbal actions. The chapter also explains which kinds of data are used in CA, how the participants’ perspective is analyzed and some of the theoretical assumptions underlying the analysis. Examples of transcribed interactional sequences with hearing loss illustrate how turn-taking, eye gaze and trouble in hearing/understanding (“repair”) are sensitive to this communication disorder.
Introduction
(2012)
Hearing loss is a prevalent communication disability, yet to date there is almost no research on naturally occurring interaction which examines how participants handle hearing loss and the use of hearing aids in communication. In contrast, research focussing on the medical and technological dimensions has advanced tremendously. Still, the social reaction to hearing loss is frequently stress, withdrawal and isolation. Despite the enormous technological development, most people who could benefit from a hearing aid do not use it. The goal of this edited volume is to present a theoretically founded, interdisciplinary research approach geared at understanding and improving social interaction impacted by hearing loss and (non-)use of hearing technologies. Towards this end, we are integrating Conversation Analysis, audiology and User Centered Design.