Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (1761)
- Article (1170)
- Conference Proceeding (442)
- Book (214)
- Other (100)
- Review (61)
- Working Paper (48)
- Part of Periodical (28)
- Doctoral Thesis (25)
- Report (17)
Language
- German (2834)
- English (961)
- French (22)
- Multiple languages (18)
- Russian (14)
- Spanish (11)
- Portuguese (9)
- Ukrainian (5)
- Latvian (3)
- Polish (3)
Keywords
- Deutsch (1505)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (544)
- Konversationsanalyse (208)
- Gesprochene Sprache (176)
- Wörterbuch (176)
- Grammatik (162)
- Interaktion (153)
- Kommunikation (140)
- Sprachgebrauch (139)
- Computerlinguistik (136)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (3883) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2490)
- Peer-Review (1008)
- Verlags-Lektorat (79)
- Peer-review (37)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (33)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (12)
- Abschlussarbeit (Bachelor, Master, Diplom, Magister) (Bachelor, Master, Diss.) (5)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (4)
- Verlagslektorat (4)
- Peer-Revied (3)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (621)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (354)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (223)
- Narr (206)
- IDS-Verlag (108)
- Lang (97)
- Niemeyer (90)
- De Gruyter (59)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (51)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (44)
We examine moments in social interaction in which a person formulates what another thinks or believes. Such formulations of belief constitute a practice with specifiable contexts and consequences. Belief formulations treat aspects of the other person's prior conduct as accountable on the basis that it provided a new angle on a topic, or otherwise made a surprising contribution within an ongoing course of actions. The practice of belief formulations subjectivizes the content that the other articulated and thereby topicalizes it, mobilizing commitment to that position, an account, or further elaboration. We describe how the practice can be put to work in different activity contexts: sometimes it is designed to undermine the other's position as a subjective 'mere belief', at other times it serves to mobilize further topic talk. Throughout, belief formulations show themselves to be a method by which we get to know ourselves and each other as mental agents.
Discourse metaphors
(2008)
The article introduces the notion of discourse metaphor, relatively stable metaphorical mappings that function as a key framing device within a particular discourse over a certain period of time. Discourse metaphors are illustrated by case studies from three lines of research: on the cultural imprint of metaphors, on the negotiation of metaphors and on cross-linguistic occurrence. The source concepts of discourse metaphors refer to phenomenologically salient real or fictitious objects that are part of interactional space (i.e., can be pointed at, like MACHINES or HOUSES) and/or occupy an important place in cultural imagination. Discourse metaphors change both over time and across the discourses where they are used. The implications of focussing on different types of source domains for our thinking about the embodiment and sociocultural situatedness of metaphor is discussed, with particular reference to recent developments in Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Research on discourse suggests that situatedness is a crucial factor in the functioning and dynamics of metaphor.
This chapter describes the resources that speakers of Polish use when recruiting assistance and collaboration from others in everyday social interaction. The chapter draws on data from video recordings of informal conversation in Polish, and reports language-specific findings generated within a large-scale comparative project involving eight languages from five continents (see other chapters of this volume). The resources for recruitment described in this chapter include linguistic structures from across the levels of grammatical organization, as well as gestural and other visible and contextual resources of relevance to the interpretation of action in interaction. The presentation of categories of recruitment, and elements of recruitment sequences, follows the coding scheme used in the comparative project (see Chapter 2 of the volume). This chapter extends our knowledge of the structure and usage of Polish with detailed attention to the properties of sequential structure in conversational interaction. The chapter is a contribution to an emerging field of pragmatic typology.