Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (10)
- Conference Proceeding (9)
- Article (3)
- Working Paper (2)
- Other (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (25)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (8)
- Digital Humanities (7)
- Forschungsdaten (5)
- Infrastruktur (5)
- Sprachdaten (5)
- Deutsch (4)
- Annotation (3)
- Forschungsinfrastruktur (3)
- Standardisierung (3)
- TextGrid (3)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (25) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (25) (remove)
Publisher
- European language resources association (ELRA) (4)
- Zenodo (3)
- McGill University & Université de Montréal (2)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (1)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (1)
- Graphen & Netzwerke; AG des Verbandes Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V. (1)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (1)
- Linköping University Electronic Press (1)
- Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont / Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics (1)
- Springer (1)
Despite being an official language of several countries in Central and Western Europe, German is not formally recognised as the official language of the Federal Republic of Germany. However, in certain situations the use of the German language, including the spelling rules, is subject to state regulation (by acts of Federal Parliament orby administrative decisions). This article presents the content of this regulation, its scope, and the historical context in which it was adopted.
Poster des Text+ Partners Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache Mannheim präsentiert beim Workshop "Wohin damit? Storing and reusing my language data" am 22. Juni 2023 in Mannheim. Das Poster wurde im Kontext der Arbeit des Vereins Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur (NFDI) e.V. verfasst. NFDI wird von der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den 16 Bundesländern finanziert, und das Konsortium Text+ wird gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – Projektnummer 460033370. Die Autor:innen bedanken sich für die Förderung sowie Unterstützung. Ein Dank geht außerdem an alle Einrichtungen und Akteur:innen, die sich für den Verein und dessen Ziele engagieren.
Open Science and language data: Expectations vs. reality. The role of research data infrastructures
(2023)
Language data are essential for any scientific endeavor. However, unlike numerical data, language data are often protected by copyright, as they easily meet the threshold of originality. The role of research infrastructures (such CLARIN, DARIAH, and Text+) is to bridge the gap between uses allowed by statutory exceptions and the requirements of Open Science. This is achieved on the one hand by sharing language data produced by research organisations with the widest possible circle of persons, and on the other by mutualizing efforts towards copyright clearance and appropriate licensing of datasets.
Als Teil der NFDI vernetzt Text+ ortsverteilt verschiedenste Daten und Dienste für die geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung und stellt sie der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft FAIR zur Verfügung. In diesem Beitrag beschreiben wir die Umsetzung beispielhaft im Bereich der Text+ Datendomäne Sammlungen anhand von Korpora, die in verschiedenen Disziplinen Verwendung finden. Die Infrastruktur ist auf Erweiterbarkeit ausgelegt, so dass auch weitere Ressourcen über Text+ verfügbar gemacht werden können. Enthalten ist auch ein Ausblick auf weitere zu erwartende Entwicklungen. Ein Beitrag zur 9. Tagung des Verbands "Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum" - DHd 2023 Open Humanities Open Culture.
Die durch die Covid-19-Pandemie bedingte Umstellung der Präsenzlehre auf digitale Lehr- und Lernformate stellte Lehrende und Studierende gleichermaßen vor eine Herausforderung. Innerhalb kürzester Zeit musste die Nutzung von Plattformen und digitalen Tools erlernt und getestet werden. Der Beitrag stellt exemplarisch Dienste und Werkzeuge von CLARIAH-DE vor und erläutert, wie die digitale Forschungsinfrastruktur Lehrende und Studierende auch im Rahmen der digitalen Lehre unterstützen kann.
The CLARIN infrastructure as an interoperable language technology platform for SSH and beyond
(2023)
CLARIN is a European Research Infrastructure Consortium developing and providing a federated and interoperable platform to support scientists in the field of the Social Sciences and Humanities in carrying-out language-related research. This contribution provides an overview of the entire infrastructure with a particular focus on tool interoperability, ease of access to research data, tools and services, the importance of sharing knowledge within and across (national) communities, and community building. By taking into account FAIR principles from the very beginning, CLARIN succeeded in becoming a successful example of a research infrastructure that is actively used by its members. The benefits CLARIN members reap from their infrastructure secure a future for their common good that is both sustainable and attractive to partners beyond the original target groups.
In 2010, ISO published a standard for syntactic annotation, ISO 24615:2010 (SynAF). Back then, the document specified a comprehensive reference model for the representation of syntactic annotations, but no accompanying XML serialisation. ISO’s subcommittee on language resource management (ISO TC 37/SC 4) is working on making the SynAF serialisation ISOTiger an additional part of the standard. This contribution addresses the current state of development of ISOTiger, along with a number of open issues on which we are seeking community feedback in order to ensure that ISOTiger becomes a useful extension to the SynAF reference model.
The Leibniz-Institute for the German Language (IDS) was established in Mannheim in 1964. Since then, it has been at the forefront of innovation in German linguistics as a hub for digital language data. This chapter presents various lessons learnt from over five decades of work by the IDS, ranging from the importance of sustainability, through its strong technical base and FAIR principles, to the IDS’ role in national and international cooperation projects and its expertise on legal and ethical issues related to language resources and language technology.
Ethical issues in Language Resources and Language Technology are often invoked, but rarely discussed. This is at least partly because little work has been done to systematize ethical issues and principles applicable in the fields of Language Resources and Language Technology. This paper provides an overview of ethical issues that arise at different stages of Language Resources and Language Technology development, from the conception phase through the construction phase to the use phase. Based on this overview, the authors propose a tentative taxonomy of ethical issues in Language Resources and Language Technology, built around five principles: Privacy, Property, Equality, Transparency and Freedom. The authors hope that this tentative taxonomy will facilitate ethical assessment of projects in the field of Language Resources and Language Technology, and structure the discussion on ethical issues in this domain, which may eventually lead to the adoption of a universally accepted Code of Ethics of the Language Resources and Language Technology community.
This paper will address the challenge of creating a knowledge graph from a corpus of historical encyclopedias with a special focus on word sense alignment (WSA) and disambiguation (WSD). More precisely, we examine WSA and WSD approaches based on article similarity to link messy historical data, utilizing Wikipedia as aground-truth component – as the lack of a critical overlap in content paired with the amount of variation between and within the encyclopedias does not allow for choosing a ”baseline” encyclopedia to align the others to. Additionally, we are comparing the disambiguation performance of conservative methods like the Lesk algorithm to more recent approaches, i.e. using language models to disambiguate senses.
XML has been designed for creating structured documents, but the information that is encoded in these structures are, by definition, out of scope for XML. Additional sources, normally not easily interpretable by computers, such as documentation are needed to determine the intention of specific tags in a tag-set. The Component Metadata Infrastructure (CMDI) takes a rather pragmatic approach to foster interoperability between XML instances in the domain of metadata descriptions for language resources. This paper gives an overview of this approach.
Twenty-two historical encyclopedias encoded in TEI: a new resource for the Digital Humanities
(2020)
This paper accompanies the corpus publication of EncycNet, a novel XML/TEI annotated corpus of 22 historical German encyclopedias from the early 18th to early 20th century. We describe the creation and annotation of the corpus, including the rationale for its development, suggested methodology for TEI annotation, possible use cases and future work. While many well-developed annotation standards for lexical resources exist, none can adequately model the encyclopedias at hand, and we therefore suggest how the TEI Lex-0 standard may be modified with additional guidelines for the annotation of historical encyclopedias. As the digitization and annotation of historical encyclopedias are settling on TEI as the de facto standard, our methodology may inform similar projects.
Providing online repositories for language resources is one of the main activities of CLARIN centres. The legal framework regarding liability of Service Providers for content uploaded by their users has recently been modified by the new Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. A new category of Service Providers, Online Content-Sharing Service Providers (OCSSPs), was added. It is subject to a complex and strict framework, including the requirement to obtain licenses from rightholders for the hosted content. This paper provides the background and effect of these changes to law and aims to initiate a debate on how CLARIN repositories should navigate this new legal landscape.
Die Bedeutung von Forschungsdatenmanagement im wissenschaftspolitischen Diskurs und im wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsalltag nimmt stetig zu. Nationale und internationale Forschungsinfrastrukturen, Verbünde, disziplinäre Datenzentren und institutionelle Kompetenzzentren nähern sich den Herausforderungen aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven. Dieser Beitrag stellt das Data Center for the Humanities an der Universität zu Köln als Beispiel für ein universitäres Datenzentrum mit fachlicher Spezialisierung auf die Geisteswissenschaften vor.
Das vorliegende Papier fasst den bisherigen Diskussionsstand zur Konzeption eines Organisationsmodells für die institutionelle Verstetigung des Verbundforschungsprojektes TextGrid zusammen und bündelt die bisherigen Arbeitsergebnisse im Arbeitspaket 3 – Strukturelle und organisatorische Nachhaltigkeit. Das hier skizzierte Organisationsmodell basiert auf den in D-Grid und WissGrid erarbeiteten Nachhaltigkeitskonzepten und adaptiert das Konzept der Virtuellen Organisation (VO) für TextGrid. Insgesamt strebt TextGrid eine institutionelle Verstetigung seiner Aktivitäten nach Ende der Projektlaufzeit an und beabsichtigt gemeinsam mit Virtuellen Forschungsumgebungen aus anderen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen Wege und Prozesse etablieren zu können. Am 24./25. Februar 2011 hat TextGrid einen Strategie-Workshop in Berlin ausgerichtet, zu dem sich eine Expertenrunde zur „Nachhaltigkeit von Virtuellen Forschungsumgebungen“ eingefunden hat. Diskutiert werden wird, wie Virtuelle Forschungsumgebungen basierend auf heutigen finanziellen und organisatorischen Strukturen nachhaltig sein können und welche Empfehlungen sich daraus für TextGrid ableiten. Die Diskussionsergebnisse der Expertenrunde werden zusammen mit den Überlegungen in diesem Papier in die Konzeption eines umfassenderen Organisationsmodells einfließen, das die Grundlage für eine Verstetigung von TextGrid bilden wird.
In TextGrid gibt es verschiedene Content-Provider, deren Ressourcen nicht ohne weiteres in der TextGrid-Infrastruktur zur Verfügung gestellt werden können. Die Ursache hierfür ist, dass die erforderlichen Zugriffsbeschränkungen bislang nicht von der existierenden Autorisierungsinfrastruktur abgebildet werden können. Beispielsweise ist es für den Zugriff auf einige Ressourcen am Institut für Deutsche Sprache notwendig, dass Benutzer einen Lizenzvertrag akzeptieren. Um diesen Content-Providern die Bereitstellung ihrer Ressourcen in TextGrid zu ermöglichen, muss die bestehende Autorisierungsinfrastruktur erweitert werden, um feinere Zugriffsbeschränkungen zu ermöglichen.
Für die Lizenzierung der in TextGrid bereitgestellten Software und Daten wird künftig eine Lizenzierung benötigt, welche der offenen Struktur der angestrebten Forschungsplattform gerecht wird. Hierfür entwickelt AP 3.2 Musterlizenzvereinbarungen mit unterschiedlichen Content-Providern. Im Folgenden soll ein Überblick über unterschiedliche Möglichkeiten der Lizenzierung gegeben werden, um sowohl potenziell für TextGrid heranzuziehende Fremd-Software zu evaluieren als auch eine Orientierung für die Lizenzierung eigener Produkte und Daten zu geben. Letztendlich soll eine Empfehlung für ein möglicherweise in TextGrid angewandtes Modell gegeben werden.
Im zweiten Teil dieses Textes wird ein Konzept für die neue TextGrid-Middleware-Komponente TG-license vorgestellt, durch die auch lizensierter Content im Rahmen von TextGridRep zur Verfügung gestellt werden kann.
The European digital research infrastructure CLARIN (Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure) is building a Knowledge Sharing Infrastructure (KSI) to ensure that existing knowledge and expertise is easily available both for the CLARIN community and for the humanities research communities for which CLARIN is being developed. Within the Knowledge Sharing Infrastructure, so called Knowledge Centres comprise one or more physical institutions with particular expertise in certain areas and are committed to providing their expertise in the form of reliable knowledge-sharing services. In this paper, we present the ninth K Centre – the CLARIN Knowledge Centre for Linguistic Diversity and Language Documentation (CKLD) – and the expertise and services provided by the member institutions at the Universities of London (ELAR/SWLI), Cologne (DCH/IfDH/IfL) and Hamburg (HZSK/INEL). The centre offers information on current best practices, available resources and tools, and gives advice on technological and methodological matters for researchers working within relevant fields.
This paper discusses current trends in DeReKo, the German Reference Corpus, concerning legal issues around the recent German copyright reform with positive implications for corpus building and corpus linguistics in general, recent corpus extensions in the genres of popular magazines, journals, historical texts, and web-based football reports. Besides, DeReKo is finally accessible via the new
corpus research platform KorAP, offering registered users several news features in comparison with its predecessor COSMAS II.
The present submission reports on a pilot project conducted at the Institute for the German Language (IDS), aiming at strengthening the connection between ISO TC37SC4 “Language Resource Management” and the CLARIN infrastructure. In terminology management, attempts have recently been made to use graph-theoretical analyses to get a better understanding of the structure of terminology resources. The project described here aims at applying some of these methods to potentially incomplete concept fields produced over years by numerous researchers serving as experts and editors of ISO standards. The main results of the project are twofold. On the one hand, they comprise concept networks dynamically generated from a relational database and browsable by the user. On the other, the project has yielded significant qualitative feedback that will be offered to ISO. We provide the institutional context of this endeavour, its theoretical background, and an overview of data preparation and tools used. Finally, we discuss the results and illustrate some of them.
The actual or anticipated impact of research projects can be documented in scientific publications and project reports. While project reports are available at varying level of accessibility, they might be rarely used or shared outside of academia. Moreover, a connection between outcomes of actual research project and potential secondary use might not be explicated in a project report. This paper outlines two methods for classifying and extracting the impact of publicly funded research projects. The first method is concerned with identifying impact categories and assigning these categories to research projects and their reports by extension by using subject matter experts; not considering the content of research reports. This process resulted in a classification schema that we describe in this paper. With the second method which is still work in progress, impact categories are extracted from the actual text data.
The German Historical Institute Washington (GHI) is in the development phase of German History Digital (GH-D), a transatlantic digital initiative to meet the scholarly needs of historians and their students facing new historiographical and technological challenges. In the proposed paper we will discuss the research goals, methodology, prototyping, and development strategy of GH-D as infrastructure to facilitate transnational historical knowledge co-creation for the large community of researchers and students already relying on digital resources of the GHI and for the growing constituency of citizen scholars.
In this paper, we present the Multiple Annotation approach, which solves two problems: the problem of annotating overlapping structures, and the problem that occurs when documents should be annotated according to different, possibly heterogeneous tag sets. This approach has many advantages: it is based on XML, the modeling of alternative annotations is possible, each level can be viewed separately, and new levels can be added at any time. The files can be regarded as an interrelated unit, with the text serving as the implicit link. Two representations of the information contained in the multiple files (one in Prolog and one in XML) are described. These representations serve as a base for several applications.