Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (36) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (19)
- Part of a Book (8)
- Book (4)
- Other (2)
- Report (2)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Keywords
- Kommunikation (36) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (22)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (10)
- Postprint (5)
- Hybrides Open Access (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (15)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (14)
Publisher
- Taylor & Francis (7)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (6)
- IDS-Verlag (4)
- de Gruyter (3)
- Goethe-Institut (2)
- De Gruyter (1)
- Erich Schmidt (1)
- Fachverlag Hans Carl (1)
- Gesellschaft für deutsche Sprache (1)
- Hogrefe (1)
In this paper we examine the composition and interactional deployment of suspended assessments in ordinary German conversation. We define suspended assessments as lexicosyntactically incomplete assessing TCUs that share a distinct cluster of prosodic-phonetic features which auditorily makes them come off as 'left hanging' rather than cut-off (e.g., Schegloff/Jefferson/Sacks 1977; Jasperson 2002) or trailing-off (e.g., Local/Kelly 1986; Walker 2012). Using CA/IL methodology (Couper-Kuhlen/Selting 2018) and drawing on a large body of video-recorded face-to-face conversations, we highlight the verbal, vocal and bodily-visual resources participants use to render such unfinished assessing TCUs recognizably incomplete and identify six recurrent usage types. Overall, the suspension of assessing TCUs appears to either serve as a practice for circumventing the production of assessments that are interactionally inapposite, or as a practice for coping with local contingencies that render the very doing of an assessment problematic for the speaker. Data are in German with English translations.
Playing videogames is a popular social activity; people play videogames in different places, on different media, in different situations, alone or with partners, online or offline. Unsurprisingly, they thereby share space (physically or virtually) with other playing or non-playing people. The special issue investigates through different contexts and settings how non-players become participants of the gaming interaction and how players and non-players co-construct presence. The introduction provides a problem-related context for the individual contributions and then briefly presents them.
Idealerweise sollen Migrantinnen und Migranten nach ihrer Ankunft in Deutschland zunächst erfolgreich einen sprachlichen Integrationskurs absolvieren und anschließend an einer beruflichen Maßnahme teilnehmen oder je nach Alter und Berufserfahrung eine duale Ausbildung beginnen beziehungsweise gleich eine Arbeitsstelle antreten. Doch wie sieht die Realität aus? Durchlaufen alle Einwandernden tatsächlich diese Etappen? Und was passiert in den Betrieben, wenn die Migrantinnen und Migranten trotz des Besuches eines Integrationskurses eine Ausbildung beginnen und ihre Sprachkenntnisse für den Beruf (zunächst) nicht ausreichend sind? Sind die Betriebe auf solche sprachlichen und kommunikativen Herausforderungen vorbereitet? Im Folgenden werde ich auf diese Fragen in Bezug auf die jüngste Einwanderungsbewegung nach Deutschland, nämlich der durch Krieg und Vertreibung ausgelösten Migration von 2015 und 2016, eingehen. Die hier präsentierten Befunde beruhen auf den Ergebnissen unseres Projekts „Deutsch im Beruf: Die sprachlich-kommunikative Integration von Flüchtlingen", das seit 2016 am Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) in Mannheim durchgeführt wird.
As part of our project "German at Work: The Linguistic and Communicative Integration of Refugees" at the Leibniz-Institute for the German Language (Mannheim, Germany), we are conducting several ethnographic field studies to investigate the integration process of refugees into various professional fields. The guiding questions are which linguistic and communicative problems arise in workplace interactions between refugees and their colleagues and with which communicative practices the participants ensure mutual understanding. In the present article, we further focus on the question whether and how the professional trainers use the work interactions as opportunities for language mediation and which practices they use.
This study examines head nods produced as embodied and silent answers to polar questions before a transition relevance place has been reached. It discusses the notion of “response” and the ways in which the literature conceptualizes head nods. The analysis of video recordings of ordinary and institutional multiparty interactions shows that answer-nods rely on mutual gaze and that affirmative head nods may co-occur with other facial expressions (e.g., eye blinks). By replying with a silent head nod, respondents may complete an unfolding adjacency pair without claiming speakership, thereby enabling the questioner to extend their turn-in-progress. Alternatively, respondents may expand their answer-nod with talk, in which case silent nodding may contribute to organizing the smooth transition of turns-at-talk. Head nods produced while a question is unfolding are described as a microsequential phenomenon that may affect the questioner’s turn-in-progress. Data are in French and Italian.
Das Ziel des Beitrags ist es, die Merkmale von Kommunikationsstörungen in Star-Interviews aus Sicht der Befragten, also der Interviewten festzustellen und zu analysieren. Die empirische Forschungsbasis besteht aus ukrainisch- und deutschsprachigen Videointerviews aus den Jahren 2010 bis 2019, die entweder im Fernsehen gesendet oder für YouTube produziert wurden. Das Forschungsverfahren beinhaltet die integrierte Anwendung von Methoden und Techniken der kommunikativen Linguistik, insbesondere der Diskurs-Analyse. Für die Untersuchung dieser Kommunikationsstörungen wurde eine neue methodische Grundlage entwickelt, und zwar für die Rekonstruktion eines einzelnen Ereignisses in zwei diskursiven Umgebungen, das Feststellen des kommunikativen Kontextes und der Kommunikationssituation in Interviews in vergleichbaren Sprachen. Die Ergebnisse der Studie ermöglichten es, die charakteristischen Merkmale von Kommunikationsstörungen in Star-Interviews auf drei Ebenen der kommunikativen Gattung zu identifizieren: auf der außenstrukturellen, binnenstrukturellen und situativen Ebene. Sowohl gemeinsame Merkmale von Kommunikationsstörungen als auch Unterschiede in den ukrainischen und deutschsprachigen Interviews wurden bestimmt. Die Ergebnisse der Studie zeigen, dass die Arten von Kommunikationsstörungen in Interviews mit Prominenten im Ukrainischen und Deutschen universell sind, sie spiegeln jedoch die nationalen und kulturellen Besonderheiten angesichts der Merkmale beider Sprachen und jeder Sprachkultur und ihrer Realitäten, Normen, Konventionen und Maximen der Kommunikation wider. In beiden Sprachen sind kommunikative Störungen ein typischer und oft unvermeidbarer Bestandteil von Interviews.
Communicative deviations of respondents in political video interviews in Ukrainian and German
(2021)
The research has the objective to establish the peculiarities of communicative deviations as a cognitive and at the same time discursive phenomenon in Ukrainian- and German-language video interviews from the viewpoint of respondents. The procedure of the research involves the integrated application of methods and techniques of pragmatics, deviatology and communicative linguistics. A new methodological basis has been developed for the reconstruction of communicative deviations using discourse analysis, namely for the reconstruction of a single event in two discursive environments, determining the communicative context and communication of interview in compared languages. The results of the research allow us to identify the features of communicative deviations in political interviews at the external, internal structural levels and at the situational level. The conclusions of the research indicate that the types of communicative deviations in political video interviews are universal in Ukrainian and German, but reflect national and cultural specifics given the peculiarities of both languages and each linguoculture, as well as existing realias, norms, conventions, maxims and rules of communication.
Verbs may be attributed to higher agency than other grammatical categories. In Study 1, we confirmed this hypothesis with archival datasets comprising verbs (N = 950) and adjectives (N = 2115). We then investigated whether verbs (vs. adjectives) increase message effectiveness. In three experiments presenting potential NGOs (Studies 2 and 3) or corporate campaigns (Study 4) in verb or adjective form, we demonstrate the hypothesized relationship. Across studies, (overall N = 721) grammatical agency consistently increased message effectiveness. Semantic agency varied across contexts by either increasing (Study 2), not affecting (Study 3), or decreasing (Study 4) the effectiveness of the message. Overall, experiments provide insights in to the meta-semantic effects of verbs – demonstrating how grammar may influence communication outcomes.
Die Studie untersucht die argumentstrukturellen Eigenschaften von medialen Kommunikationsverben. Das sind Verben, die sich auf Situationen beziehen, in denen die Kommunikation mithilfe eines technologischen Mediums erfolgt. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Frage, ob bzw. inwiefern sich neue, aus dem Englischen entlehnte mediale Kommunikationsverben an die Argumentstrukturen bedeutungsverwandter Verben des Deutschen resp. des Spanischen anpassen.
We are witnessing an emerging digital revolution. For the past 25–30 years, at an increasing pace, digital technologies—especially the internet, mobile phones and smartphones—have transformed the everyday lives of human beings. The pace of change will increase, and new digital technologies will become even more tightly entangled in human everyday lives. Artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), 6G wireless solutions, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (XR), robots and various platforms for remote and hybrid communication will become embedded in our lives at home, work and school.
Digitalisation has been identified as a megatrend, for example, by the OECD (2016; 2019). While digitalisation processes permeate all aspects of life, special attention has been paid to its impact on the ageing population, everyday communication practices, education and learning and working life. For example, it has been argued that digital solutions and technologies have the potential to improve quality of life, speed up processes and increase efficiency. At the same time, digitalisation is likely to bring with it unexpected trends and challenges. For example, AI and robots will doubtlessly speed up or take over many routine-based work tasks from humans, leading to the disappearance of certain occupations and the need for re-education. This, in turn, will lead to an increased demand for skills that are unique to humans and that technologies are not able to master. Thus, developing human competences in the emerging digital era will require not only the mastering of new technical skills, but also the advancement of interpersonal, emotional, literacy and problem-solving skills.
It is important to identify and describe the digitalisation phenomena—pertaining to individuals and societies—and seek human-centric answers and solutions that advance the benefits of and mitigate the possible adverse effects of digitalisation (e.g. inequality, divisions, vulnerability and unemployment). This requires directing the focus on strengthening the human skills and competences that will be needed for a sustainable digital future. Digital technologies should be seen as possibilities, not as necessities.
There is a need to call attention to the co-evolutionary processes between humans and emerging digital technologies—that is, the ways in which humans grow up with and live their lives alongside digital technologies. It is imperative to gain in-depth knowledge about the natural ways in which digital technologies are embedded in human everyday lives—for example, how people learn, interact and communicate in remote and hybrid settings or with artificial intelligence; how new digital technologies could be used to support continuous learning and understand learning processes better and how health and well-being can be promoted with the help of new digital solutions.
Another significant consideration revolves around the co-creation of our digital futures. Important questions to be asked are as follows: Who are the ones to co-create digital solutions for the future? How can humans and human sciences better contribute to digitalisation and define how emerging technologies shape society and the future? Although academic and business actors have recently fostered inclusion and diversity in their co-creation processes, more must be done. The empowerment of ordinary people to start acting as active makers and shapers of our digital futures is required, as is giving voice to those who have traditionally been silenced or marginalised in the development of digital technology. In the emerging co-creation processes, emphasis should be placed on social sustainability and contextual sensitivity. Such processes are always value-laden and political and intimately intertwined with ethical issues.
Constant and accelerating change characterises contemporary human systems, our everyday lives and the environment. Resilience thinking has become one of the major conceptual tools for understanding and dealing with change. It is a multi-scalar idea referring to the capacity of individuals and human systems to absorb disturbances and reorganise their functionality while undergoing a change. Based on the evolving new digital technologies, there is a pressing need to understand how these technologies could be utilised for human well-being, sustainable lifestyles and a better environment. This calls for analysing different scales and types of resilience in order to develop better technology-based solutions for human-centred development in the new digital era.
This white paper is a collaborative effort by researchers from six faculties and groups working on questions related to digitalisation at the University of Oulu, Finland. We have identified questions and challenges related to the emerging digital era and suggest directions that will make possible a human-centric digital future and strengthen the competences of humans and humanity in this era.