Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Grammatik (3)
- Infinitkonstruktion (2)
- Kontrastive Syntax (2)
- Kontrolle <Linguistik> (2)
- Nicht-kanonisches Subjekt (2)
- Subjekt <Linguistik> (2)
- Syntax (2)
- Aufforderung (1)
- Conversation Analysis (1)
- Deutsch (1)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (3) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2)
- Peer-Review (1)
Publisher
- Benjamins (3) (remove)
Schegloff (1996) has argued that grammars are “positionally-sensitive”, implying that the situated use and understanding of linguistic formats depends on their sequential position. Analyzing the German format Kannst du X? (corresponding to English Can you X?) based on 82 instances from a large corpus of talk-in-interaction (FOLK), this paper shows how different action-ascriptions to turns using the same format depend on various orders of context. We show that not only sequential position, but also epistemic status, interactional histories, multimodal conduct, and linguistic devices co-occurring in the same turn are decisive for the action implemented by the format. The range of actions performed with Kannst du X? and their close interpretive interrelationship suggest that they should not be viewed as a fixed inventory of context-dependent interpretations of the format. Rather, the format provides for a root-interpretation that can be adapted to local contextual contingencies, yielding situated action-ascriptions that depend on constraints created by contexts of use.
Control, typically defined as a specific referential dependency between the null-subject of a non-finite embedded clause and a co-dependent of the matrix predicate, has been subject to extensive research in the last 50 years. While there is a broad consensus that a distinction between Obligatory Control (OC), Non-Obligatory Control (NOC) and No Control (NC) is useful and necessary to cover the range of relevant empirical phenomena, there is still less agreement regarding their proper analyses. In light of this ongoing discussion, the articles collected in this volume provide a cross-linguistic perspective on central questions in the study of control, with a focus on non-canonical control phenomena. This includes cases which show NOC or NC in complement clauses or OC in adjunct clauses, cases in which the controlled subject is not in an infinitival clause, or in which there is no unique controller in OC (i.e. partial control, split control, or other types of controllers). Based on empirical generalizations from a wide range of languages, this volume provides insights into cross-linguistic variation in the interplay of different components of control such as the properties of the constituent hosting the controlled subject, the syntactic and lexical properties of the matrix predicate as well as restrictions on the controller, thereby furthering our empirical and theoretical understanding of control in grammar.