Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Datenschutz (2)
- Forschungsdaten (2)
- Geistiges Eigentum (2)
- Recht (2)
- Computerlinguistik (1)
- Datenmanagement (1)
- Digital Humanities (1)
- ISO-Norm (1)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (1)
- Meinungsfreiheit (1)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (3) (remove)
Publisher
- CLARIN (3) (remove)
This paper describes the TEI-based ISO standard 2462:2016 “Transcription of spoken language” and other formats used within CLARIN for spoken language resources. It assesses the current state of support for the standard and the interoperability between these formats and with relevant tools and services. The main idea behind the paper is that a digital infrastructure providing language resources and services to researchers should also allow the combined use of resources and/or services from different contexts. This requires syntactic and semantic interoperability. We propose a solution based on the ISO/TEI format and describe the necessary steps for this format to work as an exchange format with basic semantic interoperability for spoken language resources across the CLARIN infrastructure and beyond.
Sometimes legal scholars get relevant but baffling questions from laypersons like: “The reference to a work is personal data, so does the GDPR actually require me to anonymise it? Or, as my voice data is personal data, does the GDPR automatically give me access to a speech recognizer using my voice sample? Or, can I say anything about myself without the GDPR requiring the web host to anonymise or remove the post? What can I say about others like politicians? And, what can researchers say about patients in a research report?” Based on these questions, the authors address the interaction of intellectual property and data protection law in the context of data minimisation and attribution rights, access rights, trade secret protection, and freedom of expression.
Twitter data is used in a wide variety of research disciplines in Social Sciences and Humanities. Although most Twitter data is publicly available, its re-use and sharing raise many legal questions related to intellectual property and personal data protection. Moreover, the use of Twitter and its content is subject to the Terms of Service, which also regulate re-use and sharing. This extended abstract provides a brief analysis of these issues and introduces the new Academic Research product track, which enables authorized researchers to access Twitter API on a preferential basis.