Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (11) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (6)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (11)
Keywords
- Sprachvariante (11) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (5)
- Peer-Review (3)
- Peer-Revied (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (4)
- Winter (2)
- Buske (1)
- E. Schmidt (1)
- Institut für Phonetik und Sprachverarbeitung, Universität München (1)
- Steiner (1)
- de Gruyter (1)
The current paper presents a corpus containing 35 dialogues of spontaneously spoken southern German, including half an hour of articulography for 13 of the speakers. Speakers were seated in separate recording chambers, mimicking a telephone call, and recorded on individual audio channels. The corpus provides manually corrected word boundaries and automatically aligned segment boundaries. Annotations are provided in the Praat format. In addition to audio recordings, speakers filled out a detailed questionnaire, assessing among others their audio-visual consumption habits.
Von Gastarbeitern zu Transmigranten. Sprachliche Variation in deutsch-türkischen Lebenswelten
(2016)
Konstanz, Wandel, Variation. Sprachkontakt in der Welt europäischer National- und Standardsprachen
(2016)
This paper explores speakers’ notions of the situational appropriacy of linguistic variants. We conducted a web-based survey in which we collected ratings of the appropriacy of variants of linguistic variables in spoken German. A range of quantitative methods (cluster analysis, factor analysis and various forms of visualization techniques) is applied in order to analyze metalinguistic awareness and the differences in the evaluation of written vs. spoken stimuli. First, our data show that speakers’ ratings of the appropriacy of linguistic variants vary reliably with two rough clusters representing formal and informal speech situations and genres. The findings confirm that speakers adhere to a notion of spoken standard German which takes genre and register-related variation into account. Secondly, our analysis reveals a written language bias: metalinguistic awareness is strongly influenced by the physical mode of the presentation of linguistic items (spoken vs. written).