Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (113) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (42)
- Part of a Book (41)
- Book (12)
- Conference Proceeding (12)
- Part of Periodical (4)
- Other (1)
- Preprint (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (113) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (64)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (7)
- Postprint (3)
- Erstveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (42)
- Peer-Review (25)
- Peer-Revied (3)
- Peer-review (3)
- Peer Review (1)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitation) (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (22)
- de Gruyter (10)
- Retorika (8)
- De Gruyter (5)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (5)
- E. Schmidt (4)
- Peter Lang (4)
- Winter (4)
- Buske (3)
- Frank & Timme (3)
The paper reports the results of the curation project ChatCorpus2CLARIN. The goal of the project was to develop a workflow and resources for the integration of an existing chat corpus into the CLARIN-D research infrastructure for language resources and tools in the Humanities and the Social Sciences (http://clarin-d.de). The paper presents an overview of the resources and practices developed in the project, describes the added value of the resource after its integration and discusses, as an outlook, to what extent these practices can be considered best practices which may be useful for the annotation and representation of other CMC and social media corpora.
The paper deals with the use of ICH WEIß NICHT (‘I don’t know’) in German talk-in-interaction. Pursuing an Interactional Linguistics approach, we identify different interactional uses of ICH WEIß NICHT and discuss their relationship to variation in argument structure (SV (O), (O)VS, V-only). After ICH WEIß NICHT with full complementation, speakers emphasize their lack of knowledge or display reluctance to answer. In contrast, after variants without an object complement, in contrast, speakers display uncertainty about the truth of the following proposition or about its sufficiency as an answer. Thus, while uses with both subject and object tend to close a sequence or display lack of knowledge, responses without an object, in contrast, function as a prepositioned epistemic hedge or a pragmatic marker framing the following TCU. When ICH WEIß NICHT is used in response to a statement, it indexes disagreement (independently from all complementation patterns).
Our paper deals with the use of ICH WEIß NICHT (‘I don’t know’) in German talk-in-interaction. Pursuing an Interactional Linguistics approach, we identify different interactional uses of ICH WEIß NICHT and discuss their relationship to variation in argument structure (SV (O), (O)VS, V-only). After ICH WEIß NICHT with full complementation, speakers emphasize their lack of knowledge or display reluctance to answer. In contrast, after variants without an object complement, in contrast, speakers display uncertainty about the truth of the following proposition or about its sufficiency as an answer. Thus, while uses with both subject and object tend to close a sequence or display lack of knowledge, responses without an object, in contrast, function as a prepositioned epistemic hedge or a pragmatic marker framing the following TCU. When ICH WEIß NICHT is used in response to a statement, it indexes disagreement (independently from all complementation patterns).
American English and German AI, AU observed in cognates such as Wein, wine, Haus, house are usually treated on a par, represented with the same initial vowel (cf. [ai], [au] for Am. Engl, and German [1]). Yet, acoustic measurements indicate differences as the relevant trajectories characteristically cross in Am. Engl, but not in German. These data may indicate consistency with the same initial target for these diphthongs in German, supporting the choice of the same Symbol /a/ in phonemic representation, as opposed to distinct targets (and distinct initial phonemes) in American English.
Aktuelle Änderungen des Rats für deutsche Rechtschreibung 2016 - Hintergründe und Begründungen
(2016)
A model of grammar needs to reconcile the undesirability inherent to allomorphy, the apparent extra burden on learning and memory, with its occurrence and possible stability. OT approaches this task by positing an anti-allomorphy constraint, henceforth referred to as "OO-correspondence", which requires leveling (i.e. sameness of sound structure) in related word forms (Benua 1997). The occurrence of allomorphy then indicates crucial domination of OO-correspondence by other constraints. To assess the adequacy of this proposal it is necessary to establish the level of abstractness at which OO-correspondence applies and to examine the consequences of this decision for ranking order. While proponents of OT tacitly assume the level in question to be rather concrete, the notion of allomorphy as originally envisioned in Structuralism was defined by distinctness at a more abstract level referred to as "phonemic" (Harris 1942; Nida 1944). The basic intuition here is that the defining property of subphonemic sound properties, their conditionedness by context, entails that whatever burden they put on learning and memory is of a fundamentally different nature than that entailed by phonemic distinctness. The evidence from German supports that intuition in that leveling can be shown to target phonemic sound structure to the exclusion of subphonemic properties. Allomorphy, defined by phonemic alterna-tion, tends to serve phonological optimization in closed class items (function words, affixes) while serving to express morphological distinctions in open class items. The key to demonstrating the correlations in question lies in the discernment of phonemic structure, which is therefore at the core of the article.
Im Verlauf der Geschehnisse in der arabischen Welt seit 2011 gewann der Begriff Arabischer Frühling an Bedeutung und avancierte zum Leitausdruck des Diskurses. Der Beitrag geht den Fragen nach, wie der Begriff Arabischer Frühling in der deutschsprachigen Öffentlichkeit sprachlich realisiert, mit welchen sprachlichen Mitteln er konstruiert und mit welchen Ereignissen – zuweilen auch Katastrophen – er identifiziert wurde bzw. wird. Dabei wird auf die symbolische Funktion des Frühlings sowohl aus historischer Perspektive der Vormärzzeit als auch aus heutiger Sicht eingegangen. Im Blickfeld der Untersuchung stehen darüber hinaus die Jahreszeitenbezeichnungen Winter, Herbst und Sommer und ihr symbolisches Verhältnis zu den arabischen Revolutionen.