Refine
Year of publication
- 2005 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (2)
- Article (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- E-Learning (1)
- Information Retrieval (1)
- Konversationsanalyse (1)
- Multimodalität (1)
- Semantik (1)
- Texttechnologie (1)
- Wortwahl (1)
- XML (Extensible Markup Language) (1)
Publicationstate
- Postprint (3) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (3) (remove)
Publisher
- Benjamins (1)
- Narr (1)
- Oxford University Press (1)
One major issue in the accomplishment of contrasts in conversation is lexical choice of items which carry the semantic Ioad of the two states of affair which are represented as being opposed to one another. These items or expressions are co-selected to be understood as being contrastively related to each other. In this paper, it is argued that the activity of contrasting itself provides them with a specific local opposite meaning which they would not obtain in other contexts. Practices of contrastingare thus seen as an example of conversational activities which creatively and systematically affect situated meanings. Basedon data from various genres, such as meetings, mediation sessions and conversations, the paper discusses two practices of contrasting, their sequential construction and their interpretative effects. It is concluded that the interpretative effects of conversational contrasting rest on the sequential deployment oflinguistic resources and on the cognitive procedures of frame-based interpretation and constructing a maximally contrastive interpretation for the co-selected expressions.
An approach to the unification of XML (Extensible Markup Language) documents with identical textual content and concurrent markup in the framework of XML-based multi-layer annotation is introduced. A Prolog program allows the possible relationships between element instances on two annotation layers that share PCDATA to be explored and also the computing of a target node hierarchy for a well-formed, merged XML document. Special attention is paid to identity conflicts between element instances, for which a default solution that takes into account metarelations that hold between element types on the different annotation layers is provided. In addition, rules can be specified by a user to prescribe how identity conflicts should be solved for certain element types.