Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (184) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (94)
- Article (62)
- Book (12)
- Part of Periodical (10)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Other (2)
- Review (1)
Language
- German (184) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (184) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (107)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (13)
- Konversationsanalyse (12)
- Kontrastive Grammatik (10)
- Sprachgebrauch (10)
- Deutschland (8)
- Sprachwandel (8)
- Diskursanalyse (7)
- Grammatik (7)
- Kolloquium (7)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (58)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (16)
- Postprint (10)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (64)
- Peer-Review (15)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (1)
- Verlags-Lektorat (1)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (31)
- de Gruyter (31)
- Narr (16)
- De Gruyter (7)
- Lang (5)
- Akademie Verlag (4)
- Buske (3)
- Dudenverlag (3)
- Stauffenburg (3)
- Akademie-Verlag (2)
The changes caused by the growing automatisation of processes in the lexicographer´s workstation and in lexicographic work, together with the ensuing needs of lexicographers and their demands for adequately targeted software, have not been discussed sufficiently in meta-lexicographic research. The aim of this paper is therefore to fill this gap, with a focus on academic non-commercial lexicography. After an introduction into the general functionalities of specific dictionary writing software, with the help of a real-life example we will discuss the lexicographic working environment, the new specific demands to lexicographic software as well as different tools. The final aim is to propose some recommendations for how to structure the lexicographic working environment to meet specific project requirements.
Zur Erforschung der generationsbedingten Variation im pfälzischen Sprachinseldialekt am Niederrhein
(2012)
Dieses Papier diskutiert informationsstrukturelle Aspekte der mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung im Deutschen. Auf der Grundlage einer größtenteils aus den IDS-Korpora extrahierten Belegsammlung werden Diskursgegebenheit, Fokus- und Topikstatus (vor allem) des Vorfeldmaterials beschrieben und in Bezug zu entsprechenden Aussagen in der Literatur gesetzt. Neben informationsstrukturellen Faktoren werden im letzten Abschnitt mögliche weitere Faktoren angesprochen, die mehrfache Vorfeldbesetzung favorisieren könnten. Zudem werden für einen begrenzten Ausschnitt des Deutschen erstmals Zahlen vorgelegt, die das Verhältnis von mehrfacher Vorfeldbesetzung zur ähnlichen, aber als „kanonischer“ geltenden Besetzung des Vorfelds mit einer (möglicherweise partiellen) Verbalphrase illustrieren.
This article deals with three interrelated phenoma in the information structure of German sentences: the focusing of negative markers, of finite verb forms and of the particles ja, doch, wohl and schon. Focusing of the finite verb is the most important marker of verum focus, as described by Höhle (1988). Focusing of particles can be an alternative means for similar purposes, while focusing of negation seems to be the contradictory opposite of verum focus. It is shown that negation- independently of its information structural status - can be interpreted on three distinct levels of sentence meaning: as an indicator of the non-facticity of a state of affairs, the non-truth of a proposition, or the non-desirability of a speech act. Focusing of the negative marker puts contrastive emphasis on the negative value assigned to sentence meaning on one of these levels. Ve rum focus can be interpreted on the same three levels: as a marker of contrastive emphasis on a positive value of facticity, truth or desirability. The particles ja, doch, wohl and schon refer to sufficient epistemic or interactional conditions for the assignment of a positive or negative value. By focusing such a particle, the speaker indicates that (s)he believes the assigned value to be well justified and insists on establishing it as common ground for further interaction.